Effect of Feeding Bacillus subtilis natto on Hindgut Fermentation and Microbiota of Holstein Dairy Cows

Article information

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci.. 2014;27(4):495-502
1State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
*Corresponding Author: Jiaqi Wang. Tel: +86-10-62890458, Fax: +86-10-62897587, E-mail: jqwangcaas@gmail.com

College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

a

These two authors contribute equally to this work.

Received 2013 August 20; Revised 2013 November 27; Accepted 2013 October 29.

Abstract

The effect of Bacillus subtilis natto on hindgut fermentation and microbiota of early lactation Holstein dairy cows was investigated in this study. Thirty-six Holstein dairy cows in early lactation were randomly allocated to three groups: no B. subtilis natto as the control group, B. subtilis natto with 0.5×1011 cfu as DMF1 group and B. subtilis natto with 1.0×1011 cfu as DMF2 group. After 14 days of adaptation period, the formal experiment was started and lasted for 63 days. Fecal samples were collected directly from the rectum of each animal on the morning at the end of eighth week and placed into sterile plastic bags. The pH, NH3-N and VFA concentration were determined and fecal bacteria DNA was extracted and analyzed by DGGE. The results showed that the addition of B. subtilus natto at either treatment level resulted in a decrease in fecal NH3-N concentration but had no effect on fecal pH and VFA. The DGGE profile revealed that B. subtilis natto affected the population of fecal bacteria. The diversity index of Shannon-Wiener in DFM1 decreased significantly compared to the control. Fecal Alistipes sp., Clostridium sp., Roseospira sp., beta proteobacterium were decreased and Bifidobacterium was increased after supplementing with B. subtilis natto. This study demonstrated that B. subtilis natto had a tendency to change fecal microbiota balance.

INTRODUCTION

Probiotics are living microbes which administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit to the host (FAO/WHO, 2001). Some researches showed that probiotics can improve the performance of calves (Meyer et al., 2001; Timmerman et al., 2005), modify intestinal balance (Fuller, 1989) and mitigate calf scours (Wehnes et al., 2009). Probiotics can have several modes of action. These include - restricting colonization of pathogenic microbes on mucosal surfaces by a mechanism of competitive exclusion, stimulating an immune response, facilitating the proliferation of other commensal bacteria and producing antimicrobial substances (La Ragione et al., 2001; Hong et al., 2005; Leser et al., 2009).

The major probiotic strains are Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces, Bacillus, Streptococcus, and Aspergillus (Tannock, 2001), and so on. Most of the previous research on probiotics were focused on the application of various strains of lactic acid bacteria (Miettinen et al., 1996; Holzapfel et al., 2001). Several Bacillus sp. bacteria, such as Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis have gained more attention for their role in controlling infectious diseases, thereby improving productive performance in animals (Holzapfel et al., 2001). Unlike the lactic acid bacteria, Bacillus sp. is not normally found in the gastrointestinal tract. Bacillus sp. exists in an endosymbiotic relationship with their host, being temporarily able to survive and proliferate within gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and finally excreted in the faeces (Hong et al., 2005). Bacillus sp. also provides beneficial effects via one or a number of the modes of action described above (Wehnes et al., 2009). Bacillus sp. have demonstrated effectiveness as probiotics because they have been shown to be capable of inhibiting pathogens, such as Clostridium sp. (Guo et al., 2006), Campylobacter sp. (Fritts et al., 2000), Streptococcus sp. (Teo and Tan, 2005), Escherichia coli (Teo and Tan, 2006), Salmonella typhimurium, and Staphylococcus aureus (Sumi et al., 1997). B. subtilis natto isolated from the Japanese fermented soybean staple known as ‘natto’ is a gram-positive spore-forming bacterium and is a subspecies of B. subtilis according to the 16S rRNA sequence analysis (Qin et al., 2005). Our prior research suggested that the viable probiotic characteristics of B. subtilis natto was beneficial to the immune system of the calf (Sun et al., 2010).

The gastrointestinal tract of healthy animals is colonized by a complex microbiota formed by many different species of microorganism (Frizzo et al., 2008). The microbial balance in the microbiota of the digestive tract is important to promote efficient digestion and maximum nutrient absorption. It can increase the host capacity for excluding pathogen microorganisms and thus, to prevent some diseases at the same time (Walter et al., 2003). The microbial shedding and fermentation parameters of the feces can particularly reflect the true condition of the hindgut (Fox et al., 2007). However, the effects of dietary supplementation with B. subtilus natto on hindgut microbiology and microbial population have been rarely investigated. Consequently, this study was designed to assess the effect of B. subtilis natto on hindgut microbiota and fermentation of Holstein dairy cows.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cows and diets

All animals used in this experiment were maintained according to the principles of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Animal Care and Use Committee. The study was conducted at the Beijing Dairy Cattle center in Yanqing Conty, Beijing. Thirty-six early lactation Holstein dairy cows were used in this experiment, and the experiment dates were from March 9th to May 3rd, 2010. Cows were fed a typical total mixed ration (TMR) based on China Standard NY/t 34 (2004) and NRC (2001) (Table 1) and pre-weighted rations (110%) of TMR was supplied to the cows every meal.

Ingredient and chemical composition of the diet (DM basis)

Experimental design

After two weeks of adaptation feeding, cows were divided into three groups: i) no B. subtilis natto as the control group (CON); ii) cows were fed the TMR diet supplemented with 6 g/d B. subtilis natto fermentation product (0.5×1011 cfu of B. subtilis natto/d) (DFM1); and iii) cows were fed the TMR diet supplemented with 12 g/d B. subtilis natto fermentation product (1.0×1011 cfu of B. subtilis natto/d) (DFM2). The TMR was given three times a day at 0700, 1400 and 2100 with the B. subtilis natto being added daily in the morning feeding. The solid state fermentation products were produced by Langfang Dongxin Biological Technology Co., LTD (China) using the prior identified B. subtilis natto from our laboratory. The number of viable B. subtilis natto spores in the product was determined by plate count on LB medium (5% agar, 0.5% NaCl, 1% soya peptone, 0.3% beef extract, pH = 7.0) after heat treatment (80°C for 10 min), and approximately 8.3×109 spores per gram of solid-state fermentation product were obtained. Animals had free access to fresh water and a plain mineral block during the period of the experiment.

Sample collection and analysis

Fecal samples were collected directly from the rectum of each animal on the morning at the end of eighth week and placed into sterile plastic bags. These bags were kept on ice until the sampling of all animals was completed. The entire process was limited to one hour’s duration

Fecal pH

The pH of fresh feces was determined immediately after defecation by thoroughly mixing 10 g fresh feces with 20 mL double-deionized water in 50 mL tubes and submerging the pH probe (370 model pH meter, Jenway, UK) in the mixture (Breg et al., 2005). Then 4ml of the feces suspension was placed into a 10 mL sterile test tube. 1 mL 25% meta-phosphoric acid was added into 4 mL of the feces suspension, then mixed well and stored at −20°C for further NH3-N and VFA analysis.

Fecal NH3-N and VFA

Fecal NH3-N was measured according to Bromner and Keeney (1965). Fecal VFA concentrations were determined using gas chromatography (model 6890, Series II; Hewlett Packard Co., Avondale, PA) using a DB-FFAP (15 m×0.32 mm×0.25 μm) and FID. The samples were run at a split ratio of 50:1 with a programmed temperature gradient (100°C initial temperature for 1 min, with a 2°C rise per min to 120°C and a 10 min final temperature). The temperature of the injector and detector was 250°C and 280°C respectively. The carrier gas was N2, and column flow rate was 1 mL/min (Mohammed et al., 2004).

PCR-DGGE

The fecal DNA of the eight week was extracted by the method of RBB+C (Yu et al., 2004). For DGGE analysis, approximately 200 bp of the fecal total 16S rDNA gene was amplified using primers: 338f (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGC AG-3′) and 533r (5′-TTACCGCGGCTGCTGGCAC-3′) and with a 40-base GC-clamp (CGCCCGCCGCGCGCGGCGGGCGGGGCGGGGGCACGGGGGG) at the 5′ terminus of 338f primer. All PCR amplifications were performed in 50 μL volumes containing 25 μL 2×HiFiTaq StarMix (GenStar, USA), 1 μL 500 nM each primer, 100 ng DNA template. After prior denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, 10 cycles of touchdown PCR were performed (94°C for 30 s, 61°C for 30 s, with a 0.5°C per cycle decrement, and 72°C for 1 min), followed by 25 cycles of PCR (94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min), and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min.

The PCR-DGGE was performed using a DCode Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Fifteen μL of PCR products were loaded in a 7.5% polyacrylamide/gel (37.5:1) in 0.5×TAE (20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 10 mmol/L acetic acid, 0.5 mmol/L EDTA adjusted to pH 8.3) buffer. The polyacrylamide gels contained a 40% of denaturant at the top of the gel grading to a 60% denaturant at the bottom (100% denaturants consisting of 40% [v/v] formamide and 7 M urea). The DGGE gel was run for 16 h at 60°C and 85 V. After electrophoresis, the gels were stained with silver nitrate (Yu et al., 2004).

Sequencing

Putative indicator bands were excised from the gels and DNAs were recovered according to boiling methods (Wang et al., 2006). The 16S rDNA from each band was enriched by PCR using the same primer 338f and 533r without a GC-clamp under the prior PCR process. Purified PCR products were cloned into pMD18-T vector, and transformed into Escherichia coli JM109 competent cells following the manufacturer’s instructions (TaKaRa, Japan). Screening the positive clones in the LB solid medium containing X-Gal and ampicillin (Amp), and the sequencing was completed by the BGI Company, Beijing center (Beijing, China). After aligning with sequences from GenBank and RDP, 16S rDNA sequences were blasted individually with the highest similar sequence.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using the Proc Mixed procedure of the SAS system (version 8.2, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). p-Values <0.05 were considered statistically significant, and trends were discussed at p<0.1.

For microbial diversity analysis, after staining, DGGE gels were scanned and analyzed using Quantity-one software (Bio-Rad) and the peak density was calculated. The unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) algorithm was used as implemented in the analysis software for the construction of dendrograms. The microbial diversity was analyzed according to Shannon-Wiener index (H′) (Spellerberg and Fedor, 2003):

  • H′ = −∑Pi logPi

  • Pi = Ni/N, relative intensity in the profile

  • Ni = surface of the peak i

  • N = sum of the surfaces for all the peak within the profile

RESULTS

Fecal pH, NH3-N and VFA

All results are listed in Table 2. There were no treatment effects on fecal pH during this study. Compared to the Control group, supplementation of B. subtilis natto in the diets led to a significant decrease in total fecal NH3-N in DFM1 and DFM2 (p<0.10). No differences were observed in total fecal VFAs or the proportion of individual VFAs such as: acetate, propionate, butyric, isobutyric, valeric or isovaleric when cows were supplemented with either 0.5×1011 cfu of B. subtilis natto/d or 1.0×1011 cfu of B. subtilis natto/d.

Effects of feeding Bacillus subtilis natto on fecal pH, NH3-N, and VFA

Fecal microbial analysis

The total fecal DNA, DGGE fingerprint for the eighth week for both CON and DFM1 is shown in Figure 1(a). Examination of the gel indicated that the position and number of bands were similar in each group. However Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 were decreased in intensity or disappeared in the same fingerprint of the DFM1 group, while bands 3, 9, and 11 increased in intensity compared with the CON. In addition the band group labeled ‘10’ was a new band group which was not present in the CON fingerprint. It was also observed that there were numerous color differences in this gel that were implied the difference in density. Dendrograms shown that lanes belonged to the same group: lanes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and lanes 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 clustered respectively and the similarity of the two groups was about 66% (Figure 1(b)). Labeled bands were excised and sequenced, the results are shown in Table 3, fecal Alistipes sp., Clostridium sp., Roseospira sp., beta proteobacterium were decreased and Bifidobacterum was increased after supplementing B. subtilis natto. However, some bands were changed such as bands group 1, 2, 3, 7, and 11, that were uncultured bacteria sp.. Even if they were excised from the band groups, the sequence was inconsistent. For example − bands 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10 generated two different results. The Shannon-Wiener index of CON and DFM1 was 3.3476±0.07 and 3.0725±0.08 respectively, and a significant difference was obtained in our study when supplementing B. subtilis natto in the diets at eight week (p<0.10).

Figure 1

(a) DGGE profiles of 16S rDNA sequences amplified from DNA extracted from the eight week of the trial. Lane 1 to 6: CON; lane 7 to 12: DFM1. (b) UPGMA clustering of Figure 1(a). No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 represent CON; No. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 represent DFM1.

Percentages sequence similarity of uncultured phenotypes from fecal samples of the 8 week colonizers to other sequences in Genebank

DISCUSSION

This study investigated the effects of supplementing B. subtilis natto on hindgut fermentation and microbiota through fecal. No obvious changes in fecal pH were observed, however, a small decline in fecal pH was previously associated with altered fermentation patterns and microbial ecology in the hindgut (Medina et al., 2002). Similar results were also observed by Qiao et al. (2010). The decrease of fecal pH in this study may have contributed to the increase of Bi dobacteria in the hindgut of the cows fed B. subtilis natto. It is also possible that the decline of fecal pH may connect with the decrease of fecal NH3-N concentration. In this study — when the B. subtilis natto product was added to the diets — the concentration of total dietary N did not change. However, the resultant concentration of fecal NH3-N was decreased (p<0.01). Fecal N contains mainly undigested feed protein and metabolic fecal N (de Boer et al., 2002). Therefore, these results can be explained by assuming that the supplementation of B. subtilis natto product enhanced the diet utilization efficiency and reduced the excretion of protein in the feces (Spiehs et al., 2009). Previous research suggested that feeding fermented products of B. subtilis to layer hens (Santoso et al., 1999) and broilers (Santoso et al., 1995) reduced NH3-N release from excreta significantly, so we would surmise that there is a microbiological component which can reduce urease activity within the fecal microbial population. No difference in fecal VFAs or the concentration of individual VFAs was observed in the treatment groups that were supplemented with B. subtilis natto. Similar results were reported in meat goats, but no consistent benefit was noted from supplementing healthy, growing meat goats with probiotic products (Whieley et al., 2009).

The microbial population of the intestine plays an important role in overall animal health, productivity and well-being. Therefore, assessing the diversity of microbial communities (in terms of richness and structure) is a useful indicator as to how animals evolve within their environment (Fromin et al., 2002). In this study we reported the changes in hindgut microflora as measured in the faeces after supplementing B. subtilis natto using DGGE methods. There was a significant difference for the Shannon-Wiener index (H′) between the CON group and the DFM1 group at the eighth week, suggesting that the microbial population in the rumen of the cows in this study was affected by supplementing B. subtilis natto. Studies have demonstrated that probiotics can provide good production responses in various fields of animal production (Fuller, 1989; Hosoi et al., 2000; Hong et al., 2005; Frizzo et al., 2008). Probiotics can competitively exclude pathogenic bacteria or be antagonistic towards their growth, thus helping to maintain the health of the intestinal tract (Jin et al., 1997; Hong et al., 2005). In addition, probiotics affects the bacterial population and mix as measured in the faeces (Whitley et al., 2009). An increase in the level of Bifidobacterium sp. and a decrease in Alistipes sp., Clostridium sp., Roseospira sp. was found in this study. This is consistent with changes in Bifidobacterium and Clostridium sp. reported by Guo et al. (2006), E. coli 0157:H7 reported in lamb faeces by Lema et al. (2001) and a reduction in Salmonella shedding in beef cattle reported by Stephens et al. (2007). However inconsistent results were reported by other researchers where the abundance and population density of dairy cow were improved by the addition of B. subtilus Pab02 (Pan et al., 2010) but no effect was found in fecal microflora after supplementing the diets of meat goats with a probiotic (Whitley et al., 2009).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of B. subtilus natto to the diets of dairy cows in early lactation was shown to significantly reduce NH3-N in the faeces indicating a possible improvement in nitrogen utilization. In addition B. subtilus natto may change the microfloral mix within the faeces. More research is required to understand the mode of action, and the effects of these changes on animal production.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The investigation was financially supported by National Basic Research Program (973) of China (2011CB100805) and grants (No.2012BAD12B02-5 and No. 2004DA125184G1103) from Ministry of Science and Technology.

References

Abe F, Ishibashi N, Shimamura S. 1995;Effect of administration of Bi dobacteria and lactic acid bacteria to newborn calves and piglets. J Dairy Sci 78:2838–2846.
Berg EL, Fu CJ, Porter JH, Kerley MS. 2005;Fructooligosaccharide supplementation on the yearling horse: Effects on fecal pH, microbial content and volatile fatty acid concentrations. J Anim Sci 83:1549–1553.
Bromner JM, Keeney DR. 1965;Steam distillation methods of determination of ammonium, nitrate and nitrite. Anal Chem Acta 32:485–495.
Campbell JM, Fahey GC, Wolf BW. 1997;Selected indigestible oligosaccharides affect large bowel mass, cecal and fecal short-chain fatty acids, pH and micro ora in rats. J Nutr 127:130–136.
Cole NA, Clark RN, Todd RW, Richardson CR, Gueye A, Greene LW, McBride K. 2005;Influence of dietary crude protein concentration and source on potential ammonia emissions from beef cattle manure. J Anim Sci 83:722–731.
de Boer IJM, Smits MCJ, Mollenhorst H, van Duinkerken G, Monteny GJ. 2002;Prediction of ammonia emission from dairy barns using feed characteristics Part 1: Relation between feed characteristics and urinary urea concentration. J Dairy Sci 85:3382–3388.
Erickson GE, Klopfenstein TJ. 2001;Managing N inputs and the effect on losses following excretion in open-dirt feedlots in Nebraska. Sci. World J 1(S2):830–835.
FAO/WHO. 2001. Evalution of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Exper consultation report Cordoba, Argentina: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations and World Health Orhanization.
Fox JT, Depenbusch BE, Drouillard JS, Nagaraja TG. 2007;Dry-rolled or steam-flaked grain-based diets and fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157 in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 85:1207–1212.
Fritts CA, Kersey JH, Motl MA, Kroger EC, Yan F, Si J, Jiang Q, Campos MM, Waldroup AL, Waldroup PW. 2000;Bacillus subtilis C-3102 (Calsporin) improves live performance and microbiological status of broiler chickens. 2000;J Appl Poult Res 9:149–155.
Frizzo LS, Bertozzi E, Soto LP, Zbrun MV, Sequeira G, Santina RD, Armesto RR, Rosmini MR. 2008;The effect of supplementation with three Lactic acid bacteria from bovine origin on growth performance and health status of young calves. J Anim Vet Adv 7:400–408.
Fromin N, Hamelin J, Tarnawski S, Roesti D, Jourdain-Miserez K, Forestier N, Teyssier-Cuvelle S, Gillet F, Aragno M, Rossi P. 2002;Statistical analysis of denaturing gel electrophoresis (DGE) ngerprinting patterns. Environ Microbiol 4:634–643.
Fuller R. 1989;Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol 66:365–378.
Guo XH, Li DF, Lu WQ, Piao XS, Chen X. 2006;Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 90:139–146.
Holzapfel WH, Haberer P, Geisen R, Björkroth J, Schillinger U. 2001;Taxonomy and important features of probiotic microorganisms in food and nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 73(Suppl):365S–373S.
Hong HA, Duc LH, Cutting SM. 2005;The use of bacterial spore formers as probiotics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:813–835.
Hosoi T, Ametani A, Kiuchi K, Kaminogawa S. 2000;Improved growth and viability of lactobacilli in the presence of Bacillus subtilis(natto), catalase, or subtilisin. Can J Microbiol 46:892–897.
Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S. 1997;Probiotics in poultry: modes of action. Worlds Poult Sci J 53:351–368.
Krehbiel CR, Rust SR, Zhang G, Gilliland SE. 2003;Bacterial direct-fed microbials in ruminant diets: Performance response and mode of action. J. Anim. Sci 81(E. Suppl 2):E120–E132.
La Ragione RM, Casula G, Cutting SM, Woodward MJ. 2001;Bacillus subtilis spores competitively exclude Escherichia coli O78:K80 in poultry. Vet Microbiol 79:133–142.
Lema M, Williams L, Rao DR. 2001;Reduction of fecal shedding of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in lambs by feeding microbial feed supplement. Small Rumin Res 39:31–39.
Leser TD, Mølbak L. 2009;Better living through microbial action: the benefits of the mammalian gastrointestinal microbiota on the host. Environ Microbiol 11:2194–2206.
Maruta K, Miyazaki H, Tadano Y, Masuda S, Suzuki A, Takahashi H, Takahashi M. 1996;Effects of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 intake on fecal ora of sows and on diarrhea and mortality rate of their piglets. Anim Sci Technol 67:403–409.
Medina B, Girard ID, Jacotot E, Julliand V. 2002;Effect of preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on microbial profiles and fermentation patterns in the large intestine of horses fed a high fiber or high starch diet. J Anim Sci 80:2600–2609.
Meyer PM, Vaz Pires A, Vagadlo AR, Correia de Simas JM, Susin I. 2001;Adição de probiótico ao leite integral ou sucedáneo e desempenho de bezerros da raça holandesa. Scientia Agricola 58:215–221.
Miettinen M, Vuopio-Varkila J, Varkila K. 1996;Production of human tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, and interleu-kin-10 is induced by lactic acid bacteria. Infect Immun 64:5403–5405.
Mohammed N, Ajisaka N, Lila ZA, Hara K, Mikuni K, Hara K, Kanda S, Itabashi H. 2004;Effect of Japanese horseradish oil on methane production and ruminal fermentation in vitro and in steers. J Anim Sci 82:1839–1846.
Muyzer G, Teske A, Wirsen CO, Jannasch HW. 1995;Phylogenetic relationships of Thiomicrospira species and their identification in deep-sea hydrothermal vent samples by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments. Arch Microbiol 164:165–172.
Ozawa K, Yokota H, Kimura M, Mitsuoka T. 1981;Effects of administration of Bacillus subtilis strain BN on intestinal ora of weanling piglets. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi 43:771–775.
Qiao GH, Shan AS, Ma N, Ma QQ, Sun ZW. 2010;Effect of supplemental Bacillus cultures on rumen fermentation and milk yield in Chinese Holstein cows. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 94:429–436.
Qin ZH, Cai JP, Ye XH. 2005;Cloning and phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene of Bacillus subtilis natto. Chinese J Microecol 17:324–326.
Santoso U, Tanaka K, Ohtani S. 1995;Effect of dried Bacillus subtilis culture on growth, body composition and hepatic lipogenic enzyme activity in female broiler chicks. Br J Nutr 74:523–529.
Santoso U, Ohtani S, Tanaka K, Sakaida M. 1999;Dried Bacillus subtilis culture reduced ammonia gas release in poultry house. Asian-Aus. J Anim Sci 12:806–809.
Scot ED, Callaway TR, Wolcott RD, Yan S, Trevor M, Robert GH, Thomas SE. 2008;Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). BMC Microbiol 8:125.
Spellerberg IF, Fedor PJ. 2003;A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the ‘Shannon–Wiener’ Index. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:177–179.
Spiehs MJ, Varel VH. 2009;Nutrient excretion and odorant production in manure from cattle fed corn wet distillers grains with solubles. J Anim Sci 87:2977–2984.
Green Stefan J. 2005;A guide to denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis Version 1–Nov 21.
Stephens TP, Longeragan GH, Karunasena E, Brashears MM. 2007;Reduction of Escherichia coli O157 and Salmonella in feces and on hides of feedlot cattle using various doses of a direct-fed microbial. J Food Prot 70:2386–2391.
Sumi H. 1997;Antibacterial activity of Bacillus natto—growth inhibition against Eschricchia coli O-157. Biosci 14:47–50.
Sun P, Wang JQ, Zhang HT. 2010;Effects of Bacillus subtilis natto on performance and immune function of preweaning calves. J Dairy Sci 93:5851–5855.
Swyers KL, Burk AO, Hartsock TG, Ungerfeld EM, Shelton JL. 2008;Effects of direct-fed microbial supplementation on digestibility and fermentation end-products in horses fed low- and high-starch concentrates. J Anim Sci 86:2596–2608.
Tannock GW. 2001;Molecular assessment of intestinal microflora. Am J Clin Nutr 73:410–414.
Teo AYL, Tan HM. 2005;Inhibition of Clostridium perfringens by a novel strain of Bacillus subtilis isolated from the gastrointestinal tracts of healthy chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4185–4190.
Teo AYL, Tan HM. 2006;Effect of Bacillus subtilis PB6 (CloSTAT)on broilers infected with a pathogenic strain of Escherichia coli. J Appl Poult Res 15:229–235.
Timmerman HM, Mulder L, Everts H, van Espen DC, van der Wal E, Klaassen G, Rouwers SMG, Hartemink R, Rombouts FM, Beynen AC. 2005;Health and growth of veal calves fed milk replacers with or without probiotics. J Dairy Sci 88:2154–2165.
Walter J, Heng NC, Hammes WP, Loach DM, Tannock GW, Hertel C. 2003;Identification of Lactobacillus reuteri genes specifically induced in the mouse gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2044–2051.
Wehnes CA, Novak KN, Patskevich V, Shields DR, Coalson JA, Smith , Davis ME, Rehberger TG. 2009;Benefits of supplementation of an electrolyte scour treatment with a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial for calves. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 1:36–44.
Whitley NC, Cazac D, Rude BJ, Jackson-O’Brien D, Parveen S. 2009;Use of a commercial probiotic supplement in meat goats. J Anim Sci 87:723–728.
Yu ZT, Mark M. 2004;Comparisons of different hypervariable regions of rrs genes for Use in fingerprinting of microbial communities by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4800–4806.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

(a) DGGE profiles of 16S rDNA sequences amplified from DNA extracted from the eight week of the trial. Lane 1 to 6: CON; lane 7 to 12: DFM1. (b) UPGMA clustering of Figure 1(a). No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 represent CON; No. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 represent DFM1.

Table 1

Ingredient and chemical composition of the diet (DM basis)

Item TMR
Ingredient (%)
 Corn silage 23.10
 Alfalfa hay 9.20
 Chinese wildrye 8.60
 Corn grain 12.90
 Dry distillers grains 2.60
 Soybean meal 8.80
 Soybean dried grain 3.73
 Barley grain 5.90
 Beet pulp 5.90
 Cotton seed meal 3.93
 Soybean curb residue 5.60
 Wheat bran 2.40
 Calcium hydrogen phosphate 1.32
 Rumen protected methionine 0.06
 Fatty powder 0.85
 Limestone 1.56
 Salt 1.02
 Molasses 0.08
 Sodium bicarbonate 1.81
 Magnesium oxide 0.21
 Premix1 0.43
 Total 100.00
Chemical composition
 NEL2 (Mcal/kg DM) 1.38
 CP (% DM) 17.77
 NDF (% DM) 43.80
 ADF (% DM) 21.83
 Ca (% DM) 0.94
 P (% DM) 0.41
1

Contained per kilogram of the premix: vitamin A, 2,000,000 IU; vitamin D, 300,000 IU; vitamin E, 3,000 IU; Cu, 3,500 mg; Fe, 10,000 mg; Zn, 10,000 mg; Mn, 9,000 mg; Mg, 9,800 mg; I, 90 mg; Se, 40 mg; Co, 30 mg.

2

Calculated value (based on China Standard NY/t 34, 2004 and NRC (2001)).

Table 2

Effects of feeding Bacillus subtilis natto on fecal pH, NH3-N, and VFA

Item Treatment1 SEM p-value

CON DFM1 DFM2
pH 6.83 6.78 6.76 0.04 0.37
NH3-N (mg/mL) 13.01 10.36 10.02 0.89 0.07
TVFA (mmol/L) 22.93 22.43 22.63 1.01 0.94
Acetate (mmol/L) 17.34 16.35 17.12 0.8 0.667
Propionate (mmol/L) 3.99 4.08 3.88 0.19 0.80
Butyric (mmol/L) 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.07 0.99
Valeric (mmol/L) 0.3213 0.2809 0.2915 0.01 0.16
Isobutyric (mmol/L) 3.99 3.96 3.88 0.21 0.94
Isovaleric (mmol/L) 0.2 0.18 0.18 0.01 0.83
1

CON = No B. subtilis natto; DFM1 = 0.5×1011 CFU of B. subtilis natto/d; DFM2 = 1.0×1011 CFU of B. subtilis natto/d.

Table 3

Percentages sequence similarity of uncultured phenotypes from fecal samples of the 8 week colonizers to other sequences in Genebank

Bands Treatment Expect Identities (%) Species
1 Control 9e-82 170/171(99) Uncultured bacterium
2 Control 3e-97 198/199(99) Uncultured bacterium
3 DFM1 3e-82 169/169(100) Uncultured bacterium
4-1 Control 4e-91 189/191(99) Alistipes sp.
4-2 Control 3e-92 190/191(99) Uncultured Bacteroidales
5-1 Control 4e-85 174/174(100) Clostridium sp.
5-2 Control 2e-84 173/173 (100) Uncultured bacterium
6-1 Control 4e-85 174/174 (100) Uncultured bacterium
6-2 Control 9e-82 170/171 (99) Roseospira sp.
7 Control 4e-85 174/174 (100) Uncultured bacterium
8 Control 3e-95 195/196 (99) Uncultured beta proteobacterium
9 DFM1 1e-96 197/198 (99) Uncultured bacterium
9-1 DFM1 2e-83 171/171 (100) Uncultured bacterium
9-2 DFM1 2e-83 171/171 (100) Clostridium sp.
10-1 DFM1 8e-93 188/188 (100) Bifidobacterium
10-2 DFM1 6e-99 199/199 (100) Uncultured bacterium
11 DFM1 9e-82 170/171 (99) Uncultured bacterium