Changes in Microbial Diversity, Methanogenesis and Fermentation Characteristics in the Rumen in Response to Medicinal Plant Extracts

Article information

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013;26(9):1289-1294
Division of Applied Life Science, Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University (Institute of Agriculture and Life Science), Jinju, 660-701, Korea
*Corresponding Author: Sung-Sill Lee. Tel: +82-55-772-1883, Fax: +82-55-772-1889, E-mail: lss@gnu.ac.kr
1Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology, Jinju, Korea.
2Animal Biotechnology, GSBIT, Hankyong National University, Anseong, Korea.
3Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University, Anseong, Korea.
4Sancheong Oriental Medicinal Herb Institute, Sancheong, Korea
Received 2013 January 29; Accepted 2013 April 05; Revised 2013 June 13.

Abstract

This study evaluated the in vitro effect of medicinal plant extracts on ruminal methanogenesis, four different groups of methanogens and ruminal fermentation characteristics. A fistulated Holstein cow was used as a donor of rumen fluid. Licorice and mugwort extracts (Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris, 0.5% and 1% of total substrate DM, respectively), previously used as folk remedies, were added to an in vitro fermentation incubated with buffered-rumen fluid. Total gas production in Glycyrrhiza uralensis extract treatment was not significantly different between treatments (p<0.05) while total gas production in the Artemisia capillaris extract treatment was lower than that of the control. Artemisia capillaris extract and Glycyrrhiza uralensis extract reduced CH4 emission by 14% (p<0.05) and 8% (p<0.05), respectively. Ciliate-associated methanogens population decreased by 18% in the medicinal plant extracts treatments. Medicinal plant extracts also affected the order Methanobacteriales community. Methanobacteriales diversity decreased by 35% in the Glycyrrhiza uralensis extract treatment and 30% in the Artemisia capillaris extract treatment. The order Methanomicrobiales population decreased by 50% in the 0.5% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis extract treatment. These findings demonstrate that medicinal plant extracts have the potential to inhibit in vitro ruminal methanogenesis.

INTRODUCTION

The attention of methane emission has now shifted towards its contribution to global warming. This growing concern about global warming has focused attention on ways to inhibit ruminal methanogenesis. Methane is generated by ruminal microbes (i.e. methanogenic archaea) that utilize H2 to reduce CO2, and this is the primary electron sink in the rumen. Enteric fermentation by ruminants is one of major contributors to biogenic methane formation, and it leads to an unproductive use of dietary energy resulting in the substantial loss of up to 12% of the dietary energy intake (Gibbs et al., 1989; Crutzen, 1995; Johnson and Johnson, 1995). Manipulating the ruminal ecosystem to enhance digestibility of fibrous feeds, and reduce methane emission by ruminants to improve animal performance are most important goals for animal microbiologists and nutritionists. Feed additives such as organic acids, ionophores, halogen compounds and other antibiotics were used to modify ruminal fermentation, affect ruminal methanogenesis and improve animal performance (Chalupa, 1988; Martin et al., 1999; McGuffey et al., 2001; Russell and Houlihan, 2003). However, the use of antibiotics as feed additives in animals is banned in the EU due to the concerns of wide spread resistant bacteria and residues in dairy products (Russell and Houlihan, 2003). Recently, attention has shifted to alternative candidates as a safe means of modifying ruminal fermentation. Plant extracts, including their secondary metabolites, have been used for centuries in traditional medicine, for industrial applications, and as food preservatives. Furthermore, due to their antimicrobial activity, they are being considered as alternatives to antibiotics in ruminant feeds with the potential to reduce ruminal methanogenesis (Davidson and Naidu, 2000; Teferedegne, 2000; Greathead, 2003). The effects of these plant extracts and their constituents on growth performance of Hanwoo calves (Sarker et al., 2010), ruminal methanogenesis (Patra et al., 2006; Patra et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2012), the physicochemical properties and sensory scores of Hanwoo beef (Moon and Jung, 2011), and nutritional composition of Hanwoo beef (Moon and Jung, 2011) were reported. However, there are limited data on effects of these plant extracts or secondary metabolites on ruminal fermentation, their mode of action and optimal dosages to improve the efficiency of nutrient utilization.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro effects of licorice and mugwort extracts (Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris, 0.5% and 1% of total substrate DM, respectively) on ruminal methanogenesis and fermentation characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rumen fluid

A fistulated Holstein cow of 500kg body weight was used as a donor of rumen fluid. Timothy and commercial concentrate (TDN; 73.5%, crude protein; 19%, crude fat; 3%, crude fiber; 12%, crude ash; 10%, Ca; 0.8%, P; 1.2%) in the ratio of 60:40 were fed at 2% of body weight twice a day (09:00 and 18:00). Water and mineral-vitamin block were allowed ad libitum. The rumen fluid was collected from the fistulated Holstein cow before morning feeding. Rumen samples were collected in a bottle, previously kept warm and filled with O2 free-CO2 gas, and carried to the laboratory.

Preparation of medicinal plant extracts

Licorice and mugwort extracts (Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris) were prepared in methanol at 100 g/300 mL of solvent. The flasks of methanol were stoppered and incubated at 39°C on a rotary shaker (HBS-201SL, HANBAEK, Korea). They were filtered through filter paper (Whatman No. 1). The filtrates were collected and the solvent was removed in a rotary evaporator, and then stored at 4°C for further use.

In vitro incubation

Rumen liquor was filtered through four layers of cheesecloth before mixing with buffer maintained at 39°C. The 25 mL of rumen fluid-buffer mixture, comprising McDougall buffer (McDougall, 1948) and rumen liquor in the ratio of 4 to 1, was dispensed anaerobically into serum bottles containing 0.3 g of timothy substrate and plant extracts (0.5% and 1% of total substrate DM, respectively). The serum bottles were filled with O2-free N2 gas capped with a rubber stopper and held in a shaking incubator (HBS-201SL, HANBAEK, Korea) at 39°C for 48 h. The in vitro experiment was evaluated in a triplicate run for analysis of gas proflies and VFAs.

Gas production

At the end of incubation, total gas production was measured by the assay of Theodorou et al. (1994). A detachable pressure transducer and a digital readout voltmeter (Laurel Electronics, Inc., CA USA) were used to measure the headspace gas pressure of fermenting cultures. For the total gas production measurement, the transducer was modified in such a way that it could be linked to the inlet of a disposable Luer-lock three-way stopcock (Theodorou, 1994). Gas pressure in the headspace was read from the display unit after insertion of the hypodermic syringe needle through the butyl rubber stopper above the culture medium.

Gas analysis and ruminal fermentation

The headspace gas in the serum bottle was collected for analyzing methane and hydrogen by gas chromatography (GC-2010, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with column (Shincarbon ST. 50/80, Shimadzu, Japan). The culture was subsampled for the analysis of pH (Mettle-Toledo, CH/MP220), volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration and gDNA extraction. VFA analysis was performed with a gas chromatography (GC-2010, Shimadzu, Japan) as described by Erwin et al. (1961).

In vitro dry matter disappearance

After centrifugation of the cultures, the residual pellets were filtered with filter paper (Whatman No. 1). Filtered pellets were dried to a constant weight at 60°C. DM disappearance was calculated to the percentage by dividing the differences between filter paper weight and filter paper weight with pellet after dried by the original weight from control culture at zero time incubation equally processed.

DNA extraction

TissueLyser (Retsch; QIAGEN, Valencia, CA), a high-speed reciprocal shaker which retains samples in screw-capped tubes containing silica beads, was used for DNA extraction. Total nucleic acid was extracted from the incubated rumen samples using the modified bead-beating protocol with the QIAamp DNA mini kit (250) (QIAGEN, USA). For samples a 1.0 mL aliquot was taken from the 25 mL incubated culture using a wide bore pipette so as to ensure a homogenous sample containing fluid and digesta. Nucleic acid concentrations were measured by using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (ND-1000, USA).

PCR primers

The PCR primer sets used in this study for amplification of ciliate-associated methanogen and four different groups of methanogens (the order Methanobacteriales, the order Methanomicrobiales, the order Methanosarcinales and the order Methanococcales) were the same as referenced by Luton et al. (2002), Medlin et al. (1998) and Yu et al. (2005), respectively as shown in Table 1.

Oligonucleotide primers used for (q)PCR assay

Real-time PCR

Quantitative PCR assays for enumeration of ciliate-associated methanogens and four different groups of methanogens were performed according to the methods described by Denman and McSweeney (2006) and Denman et al. (2007) on a real-time PCR Machine (Rotor-Gene, Crobett life science, Australia) using the iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Inc. USA). The values of cycle threshold (Ct) after real-time PCR were used to determine fold change (number of fold difference) of different microbial population relative to control without plant extract. Abundance of these microbes was expressed by the equation: relative quantification = 2−ΔCt(Target)−ΔCt(Control), where Ct represents threshold cycle. All quantative (q) PCR reaction mixtures (final volume of 25 μL) contained forward and reverse primers, the iQ SYBR Green Supermix and DNA template ranging from 10 ng to 100 ng. A negative control without the template DNA was used in every qPCR assay for each primer. The PCR conditions including the annealing and the extension temperature were as shown in references (Table 1).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the general linear model (GLM) procedure of the Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc. (SAS, 2002). The effects of the plant extracts on total gas, gas profiles, DM, pH, and VFA were compared to the controls and significant differences between treatment means were examined using Duncan’s multiple comparison tests. A p<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All analyses were carried out using Statistical Analysis Systems (SAS) version 9.1 (2002).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results of in vitro total gas production including methane and hydrogen (not detected), and dry matter disappearance by medicinal plant extracts are shown in Table 2. Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extracts affected total gas production (mL/g DM) as well as methane emission (mL/g DM). Total gas production in the Glycyrrhiza uralensis extract treatment was not significantly different from that of control, while total gas production in the Artemisia capillaris extract was lower than that of the control (p<0.05, Table 2). Artemisia capillaris extract and the Glycyrrhiza uralensis extract reduced methane emission by 14% (p<0.05) and 8% (p<0.05), respectively, after 48 h of incubation (Table 2). This finding was in agreement with decreased abundance of ciliate-associated methanogen communities and Methanobacteriales populations in this experiment. Kim et al. (2012) also reported that wormwood extract inhibited methane emission by 8% after 24 h of incubation compared with untreated control. Hydrogen produced was not detected. Hydrogen is the critical concern to the ruminal ecosystem. The formation of propionate from succinate would be a hydrogen-sink product alternative to hydrogen for ruminal methanogenesis. Hydrogen is a substrate for methane production in the rumen and regulation of the hydrogen-consuming pathway is the key to control methane emission in the rumen. This study showed that medicinal plant extracts potentially influenced ruminal methanogenesis, resulting in a reduction in methane emission. Although not significant, DM disappearance increased by 7% in the 1% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extracts treatments. The ratio of acetate to propionate in the all plant extracts treatments were not significantly different in comparison with that of control (p<0.05, Table 3).

The in-vitro effect of Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extracts on total gas, CH4 emission and ruminal disappearance of dry matter (DM) after 48 h incubation

The in-vitro effect of Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extracts on ruminal fermentation characteristics after 48 h incubation

Plant secondary metabolites including essential oils have been largely used for various purposes in agriculture as food preservatives and feed additives due to their antiseptic and medicinal properties. Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extracts used in this experiment have been used as folk remedies and oriental medicine materials. In the previous study using PCR, the order Methanococcales and the order Methanosarcinales were not detected in any incubated mixtures (Kim et al., 2013). Behlke (2007) reported that both of these two orders (the order Methanococcales and the order Methanosarcinales) were either not in the rumen or they were less than the detection limit. The Ciliate-associated methanogens population was affected by all plant extracts (Figure 1a). Ciliate-associated methanogen populations were decreased by 18% in the Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extracts treatments. Ciliate protozoa have an important role in ruminal methanogenesis by their association with methanogens which adher to their surface. The finding that medicinal plant extracts decreased the ciliated-associated methanogens agrees with evidence that protozoa-free ruminants would result in the reduction of methane emission. Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extract affected the order Methanobacteriales community (Figure 1b). Methanobacteriales community was decreased by 35% in the Glycyrrhiza uralensis extract treatment, and 30% in the Artemisia capillaris extract treatment. The order Methanomicrobiales population was decreased by 50% in the 0.5% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis extract treatment (Figure 1c). According to in vivo experiments, Sarker et al. (2010) reported that licorice among the feed additives investigated may be a suitable source of alternatives to antibiotics for Hanwoo beef calves, especially post-weaning ones. Kim et al. (2006) and Ko et al. (2006) evaluated the effect of replacing rice straw or concentrates with wormwood (Artemisia sp.) on animal performance. Based on the findings, animal performance was better when sheep were fed diets in which 50 or 100 g/kg DM of rice straw was replaced with dry wormwood than those in which 30 g/kg DM of rice straw was substituted. Replacing the concentrate with 30 to 50 g/kg DM wormwood was suitable to optimize ruminal fermentation, increase microbial yield and ether extract digestibility in sheep.

Figure 1

Relative quantification analysis of ciliate-associated methanogens (a), Methanobacteriales (b) and Methanomicrobiales (c) populations in vitro ruminal fermentation with the addition of Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extracts after 48 h incubation (Control = No additive, T1 = 0.5% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, T2 = 1% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, T3 = 0.5% of Artemisia capillaris, T4 = 1% of Artemisia capillaris).

In conclusion, Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris plant extracts, previously used as folk remedies, inhibited in vitro ruminal methanogens closely related with methane emission although ruminal fermentation characteristics were not shown expected results. It shows that Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris plant extracts have the potential to inhibit ruminal methanogenesis, especially considering the optimal dosage of plant extracts.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Bio-industry Technology Development Program, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, and Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

Behlke EJ. 2007. Attenuation of ruminal methanogenesis Theses and Dissertations in Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.
Chalupa W. 1988. Manipulation of rumen fermentation. Recent Developments in Ruminant Nutrition 2 In : Haresign H, Cole DJA, eds. Butterworths. UK: p. 1–18.
Crutzen PJ. 1995. The role of methane in atmospheric chemistry and climate. Ruminant Physiology: Digestion, Metabolism, Growth and Reproduction In : Engelhardt WV, Leonhard-Marek S, Breves G, Giesecke D, eds. Ferdinand Enke Verlag. Stuttgart, Germany: p. 291–315.
Davidson PM, Naidu AS. 2000. Phyto-phenols. Natural Food Antimicrobial Systems In : Naidu AS, ed. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL, USA: p. 265–293.
Denman SE, McSweeney CS. 2006;Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58:572–582.
Denman SE, Tomkins NW, McSweeney CS. 2007;Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 62:313–322.
Erwin ES, Marco GJ, Emery EM. 1961;Volatile fatty acid analysis of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. J Dairy Sci 44:1768–1771.
Gibbs MJ, Lewis L, Hoffman JS. 1989. Reducing methane emissions from livestock: Opportunities and issues U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC, USA:
Greathead H. 2003;Plants and plant extracts for improving animal productivity. Proc Nutr Soc 62:279–290.
Johnson KA, Johnson DE. 1995;Methane emissions from cattle. J Animal Sci 73:2483–2492.
Kim ET, Min K-S, Kim C-H, Moon YH, Kim SC, Lee SS. 2013;The effect of plant extracts on in-vitro ruminal fermentation, methanogenesis and methane-related microbes in the rumen. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 26:517–522.
Kim ET, Kim C-H, Min K-S, Lee SS. 2012;Effects of plant extracts on microbial population, methane emission and ruminal fermentation characteristics in in vitro. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 25:806–811.
Kim SC, Adesogan AT, Shin HJ, Lee MD, Ko YD. 2006;The effects of increasing the level of dietary wormwood (Artemisia montana Pampan) on intake, digestibility, N balance and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep. Livest Sci 100:261–269.
Ko YD, Kim JH, Adesogan AT, Ha HM, Kim SC. 2006;The effect of replacing rice straw with dry wormwood (Artemisia sp.) on intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 125:99–110.
Luton PE, Wayne JM, Sharp RJ, Riley PW. 2002;The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill. Microbiology 148:3521–3530.
Martin SA, Streeter MN, Nisbet DJ, Hill GM, Williams SE. 1999;Effects of DL-malate on ruminal metabolism and performance of cattle fed a high-concentrate diet. J Anim Sci 77:1008–1015.
McDougall EI. 1948;Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochem J 43:99–109.
McGuffey RK, Richardson LF, Wilkinson JID. 2001;Ionophore for dairy cattle: current status and future outlook. J Dairy Sci 84:E194–E203.
Medlin L, Elwood HJ, Stickel S, Sogin HL. 1988;The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene 71:491–499.
Moon YH, Jung IC. 2011;Physicochemical properties and sensory score of Hanwoo beef loin after feeding with mugwort. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 40:731–737.
Moon YH, Yang SJ, Jung IC. 2011;Effect of feeding mugwort (Artemisia capillaris) TMR fodder on nutritional composition of Hanwoo beef. J Life Sci 21:568–575.
Patra AK, Kamra DN, Agarwal N. 2006;Effect of plant extracts on in vitro methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feed in rumen liquor of buffalo. Anim Feed Sci Technol 128:276–291.
Patra AK, Kamra DN, Agarwal N. 2006;Effect of spices on rumen fermentation, methanogenesis and protozoa counts in in vitro gas production test. Int Cong Ser 1293:176–179.
Patra AK, Kamra DN, Agarwal N. 2010;Effects of extracts of spices on rumen methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feeds in vitro. J Sci Food Agric 90:511–520.
Russell JB, Houlihan AJ. 2003;Ionophore resistance of ruminal bacteria and its potential impact on human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:65–74.
Sarker MSK, Ko SY, Lee SM, Kim GM, Choi JK, Yang CJ. 2010;Effect of different feed additives on growth performance and blood profiles of Korean Hanwoo calves. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 23:52–60.
SAS. 2002. SAS user’s guide: Statistics SAS Inst. Inc.. Cary, NC, USA:
Teferedegne B. 2000;New perspective on the use of tropical plants to improve ruminant nutrition. Proc Nutr Soc 59:209–214.
Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J. 1994;A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 48:185–197.
Yu Y, Lee C, Kim J, Hwang S. 2005;Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol Bioeng 89:670–679.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Relative quantification analysis of ciliate-associated methanogens (a), Methanobacteriales (b) and Methanomicrobiales (c) populations in vitro ruminal fermentation with the addition of Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extracts after 48 h incubation (Control = No additive, T1 = 0.5% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, T2 = 1% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, T3 = 0.5% of Artemisia capillaris, T4 = 1% of Artemisia capillaris).

Table 1

Oligonucleotide primers used for (q)PCR assay

Target group Sequence (5′-3′) Reference
Methanogenic archaea GGTGGTGTMGGATTCACACARTAYGCWACAGC / TTCATTGCRTAGTTWGGRTAGTT Luton et al. (2002)
Ciliate-associated methanogens AGGAATTGGCGGGGGAGCAC / TGTGTGCAAGGAGCAGGGAC Medlin et al. (1988)
Methanobacteriales CGWAGGGAAGCTGTTAGT / TACCGTCGTCCACTCCTT Yu et al. (2005)
Methanomicrobiales ATCGRTACGGGTTGTGGG / CACCTAACGCRCATHGTTTAC Yu et al. (2005)
Methanosarcinales GTAAACGATRYTCGCTAGGT / GGTCCCCACAGWGTACC Yu et al. (2005)
Methanococcales TAAGGGCTGGGCAAGT / CACCTAGTYCGCARAGTTTA Yu et al. (2005)

Table 2

The in-vitro effect of Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extracts on total gas, CH4 emission and ruminal disappearance of dry matter (DM) after 48 h incubation

Treatment
SEM
Control T1 T2 T3 T4
Total gas (mL/g DM) 279.48a 275.51a 271.77a 257.92b 255.18b 3.04
CH4 (mL/g DM) 51.28a 47.24ab 48.24ab 44.13b 45.55b 0.91
DM (%) 58.14 58.90 61.42 61.40 62.51 0.69

Hydrogen was not detected.

a, b

Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05).

Control = No additive, T1 = 0.5% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, T2 = 1% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, T3 = 0.5% of Artemisia capillaris, T4: 1% of Artemisia capillaries.

Table 3

The in-vitro effect of Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Artemisia capillaris extracts on ruminal fermentation characteristics after 48 h incubation

Treatment
SEM
Control T1 T2 T3 T4
pH 6.06b 6.04b 6.05b 6.12a 6.09a 0.01
tVFA (mM) 80.63a 82.59a 76.18b 77.35b 75.94b 0.55
Acetate (mM) 51.20b 52.73a 48.67c 49.42c 48.24c 0.35
Propionate (mM) 15.74a 15.98a 14.81b 15.21b 15.04b 0.10
Butyrate (mM) 8.50b 8.99a 8.18c 8.10c 8.02c 0.07
A:P ratio 3.25ab 3.30a 3.29a 3.25b 3.21b 0.01
a,b,c

Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05).

Control = No additive, T1 = 0.5% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, T2 = 1% of Glycyrrhiza uralensis, T3 = 0.5% of Artemisia capillaris, T4 = 1% of Artemisia capillaries.