Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fermentation Product on Lactation Performance and Lipopolysaccharide Concentration of Dairy Cows

Article information

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci.. 2013;26(8):1137-1143
College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
*Corresponding Author: Sheng-yong Mao. Tel: +86-025-84395 523, Fax: +86-025-84395314, E-mail: maoshengyong@163.com
1

Diamond V Mills, Cedar Rapids, IA, USA.

Received 2013 April 02; Accepted 2013 April 28; Revised 2013 May 08.

Abstract

To evaluate lactation performance and changes in plasma and fecal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) concentrations in response to the supplementation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SC), two dairy farms were selected. On each farm, 32 cows in early to mid lactation (21 to 140 DIM) were blocked by parity and days in milk (DIM), and randomly assigned to one of the two treatments within block (Control or 56 g SC/cow/d). Effect of SC on lactation performance (daily) and changes in blood and fecal LPS level were examined on d 0 and 28 of supplementation. The results showed that SC supplementation increased lactation performance of dairy cows on both farms. On Farm 1, milk production, 3.5% fat corrected milk (FCM), and yield of milk fat and protein were greater (p<0.01) for cows supplemented with SC. Supplementation of SC increased percentage milk fat (p = 0.029) from 81 to 110 DIM. There was no significant effect (p>0.05) of SC supplementation on percentage of milk protein, dry matter intake and feed efficiency. On Farm 2, cows supplemented with SC had a greater (p<0.05) milk yield, percentage of milk fat and milk protein, yield of milk fat and protein, 3.5% FCM and feed efficiency. Supplemental SC had no effect on LPS concentrations in feces (p>0.05) while it trended to reduce (p = 0.07 or 0.207) the concentration in plasma. The results indicate that supplemental SC can increase lactation performance of dairy cattle and has potential for reducing plasma LPS concentration.

INTRODUCTION

As the supply of high quality forage is limited in China, dairy cows are often fed high concentrate diets with low quality forages, putting dairy cows in China at a higher risk of metabolic disease, such as sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA), displaced abomasum, ketosis, and fatty liver. Recent research has highlighted the role of high grain feeding in metabolic diseases and has suggested that endotoxin is involved in metabolic diseases (Gozho et al., 2005; Li et al., 2010). It has been shown that high-grain feeding increases rumen and fecal concentrations of free lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is due to an increase in lysis of gram-negative bacteria (Gozho et al., 2005). Li et al. (2010) reported that high-grain feeding increased fermentation and the production of bacterial toxins in the hindgut of dairy cows. These recent scientific advancements suggest that there may be a correlation between high-grain feeding and fecal LPS and may allow the use of fecal LPS as a diagnostic or management tool for the gut health. On the other hand, enhanced blood LPS concentration may be indicative of health problems such as mastitis or metritis (Pejsak and Tarasiuk, 1989). Therefore, application of blood and fecal LPS assays could be an additional management tool for dairies to monitor the health status of the animals. However, information on blood and fecal LPS concentrations in lactating dairy cows on commercial dairies in China is limited.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SC), has been shown to improve lactation performance when the rumen was challenged with highly fermentable carbohydrates (Longuski et al., 2009). Stimulating rumen fermentation (Miller-Webster et al., 2002) and stabilizing rumen environment evidenced by a reduction in ruminal LPS concentration under SARA induction condition (Li et al., 2012) indicates that the addition of SC may have a beneficial effect on the cow’s health and performance. Thus, the objectives of the present study were: i) to evaluate the effect of SC on lactation performance; ii) to establish a baseline level of blood and fecal LPS of lactating dairy cows from commercial dairies; iii) to determine the effect of SC on blood and fecal LPS level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee of Jiangsu province (China) and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University, China.

Animals and diets

Two commercial dairy farms were identified as non-Diamond V users near Nanjing, China. On each farm, 32 cows in early to mid lactation (21 to 140 d of lactation) were selected, blocked by parity (primiparous and multiparous), days in milk (DIM) and somatic cell count (SCC), and then randomly assigned to one of the two treatments, control or SC (Original SC Yeast Culture, Diamond V Mills, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA) within block. All cows received the same basal feed. Cows supplemented with SC received 56 g SC/cow/d, top-dressed in the morning feeding for 28 d. Control cows received 56 g/cow/d of grain mixtures (1:1 mixture of corn and soybean meal), top-dressed in the morning feeding for 28 d. The cows were housed in tie stalls with free access to water at all times. Diets were fed as a TMR with ratios of forage to concentrate of 48:52 and 45:55 for Farm 1 and Farm 2, respectively. Cows were fed for ad libitum intake twice daily at 0400 and 1400 h in equal portions. The amount of feed offered was adjusted daily to obtain approximately 10% orts (as-fed basis).

Diets were formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements of a 600-kg lactating cow according to NRC (2001) guidelines. Diet ingredients were analyzed for concentrations of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), calcium (Ca) and phosphorous (P). The DM concentration was determined by drying samples at 105°C for 2 h (AOAC 1990). Methods of Van Soest et al. (1991) were used in analyses of NDF and ADF using heat-stable amylase and sodium sulfite in the case of NDF. The CP (N×6.25) was determined by the method of Krishnamoorthy et al. (1982). The Ca and P content were analyzed according to Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC, 1990) method. Ingredients and nutrient composition of the TMR are presented in Table 1.

Ingredient and nutrient compositions of experimental diets

Sample collection

Cows were milked three times daily in their stall at approximately 0400, 1200, and 2000 h. Milk yield was recorded daily. Milk samples were collected at every milking on d 0, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of experiment period and were analyzed for protein, fat and lactose by infrared analysis with a Fossmatic-605 (Foss Electric, Hillerod, Denmark). The amounts of TMR offered and refused were measured and recorded daily, and DMI was calculated on d 0, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of experiment period of each period.

On d 0 and 28, fecal grab samples (approximately 50 g) were collected at 0300 h before morning feed delivery and blood was drawn from the tail vein using heparinized vacutainers (Becton Dickinson, NJ, USA) from each cow at 0330 h before morning feeding. Samples were placed in a cooler and delivered to the lab immediately. Blood and fecal LPS concentrations were determined in duplicates per sample.

LPS analysis in fecal samples

About 35 g fecal samples were transferred into a 50 ml centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 13,000×g for 40 min at 4°C. Once centrifuged, all tubes were removed gently from the centrifuge and 5 ml of the supernatant was aspirated into a syringe. Free LPS content in supernatant was determined by the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay (Xiamen Houshiji, Ltd., Xiamen, China). Pretreated fecal samples were diluted until their LPS concentrations were in the range of 0.1 to 1 endotoxin units (EU)/ml relative to the reference endotoxin (Escherichia coli O111:B4) and assayed as described by Gozho et al. (2005).

LPS analysis in blood plasma samples

As described by Khafipour et al. (2009), the concentration of LPS in the plasma was determined by the LAL assay (Xiamen Houshiji, Ltd., Xiamen, China) with a minimum detection limit of 0.01 EU/ml. Before the LAL assay, samples were pretreated as described by Khafipour et al. (2009). Frozen plasma samples were thawed at 37°C and vortexed. Then, 100 μl of each sample was diluted at least 10-fold with pyrogen-free water. Diluted samples were incubated at 37°C for 30 min, heated at 75°C for 15 min and cooled to room temperature (19°C) for 45 min. The LAL assay was performed using a 96 well microplate according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All of the samples were tested in duplicate, and optical density values were measured using a microplate spectrophotometer (Spectramax 190, Molecular Devices Corporation, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 405 nm. Results were accepted when the intra-assay coefficient of variation was <10%.

Statistical analysis

The 3.5% FCM and feed efficiency were calculated according to the following formulae: 3.5% FCM = (milk kg×0.432)+(fat kg×16.216); Milk efficiency = milk yield/DMI. To test the influence of SC supplementation on dry matter intake, milk protein %, milk fat %, milk yield, milk fat yield, milk protein yield, 3.5% FCM and feed efficiency, the MIXED procedure of SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) was performed using diet, DIM and days of experiment as fixed effects and d 0 values as a covariate. Samples collected on different day for the same cow were considered as repeated measures in the analysis of variance (ANOVA). For the LPS data, the general linear model (GLM) procedure of SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) was performed with diet and DIM as fixed effects and d 0 values as a covariate. Significance was declared at p≤0.05 and a tendency was considered to exist at 0.05<p<0.10.

RESULTS

Pre-trial production performance and the baseline level of LPS in plasma and feces

No significant differences (p>0.05) in pre-trial (d 0) milk yield, DMI, and LPS levels in plasma and feces between control and SC were noted on both farms (Table 2). Milk yield and DMI ranged between 19.6 and 21.7 kg/d, and 18.9 and 19.2 kg/d, respectively. Plasma LPS levels ranged from 0.15 to 0.46 EU/ml. Fecal LPS ranged from 6,668 to 7,984 EU/ml.

Pre-trial (d 0) milk yield, dry matter intake and fecal and plasma LPS

Effect of SC on production performance

On Farm 1, yield of milk (p = 0.009), milk fat (p = 0.003), milk protein (p = 0.005) and 3.5% FCM (p = 0.001) increased when cows received the SC-supplemented diet (Table 3). No significant changes (p>0.05) were observed on percentage of milk fat and protein and dry matter intake. A significant SC by DIM interaction (p = 0.003) was observed for percentage of milk fat. Effect of SC in milk fat % increased as DIM progresses (Figure 1).

Effect of yeast culture supplementation (SC)1 on milk yield and milk composition on Farm 1

Figure 1

Interaction between SC and DIM on percentage of milk fat (Farm 1). SC was fed at 56 g/cow/d (Diamond V Original XP, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA). Note: symbol on the top of standard error bars indicate the significance of the differences between data for control and SC treatment.

On Farm 2, the average daily milk yield (p = 0.017), milk protein % (p<0.001), milk fat % (p = 0.009), milk fat yield (p = 0.002), milk protein yield (p = 0.001), 3.5% FCM (p = 0.002) and feed efficiency (p = 0.011) were significantly increased with SC supplementation (Table 4). Significant SC by DIM interactions were observed in milk yield (p = 0.028), percentage of milk protein (p<0.001) and milk fat (p = 0.049), and milk protein yield (p = 0.030) (Figure 2a, 2b, 2c). Supplementation of SC resulted in an increased milk production (p<0.001) from 111 to 140 DIM. Milk fat (p<0.05) concentrations were greater for cows fed SC from 51 to 110 DIM. Cows from 51 to 140 DIM supplemented with SC had higher percentage of milk protein (p<0.05).

Effect of yeast culture supplementation (SC)1 on milk yield and milk composition on Farm 2

Figure 2

Interaction between SC and DIM on percentage of milk fat (a) and milk protein (b), and milk yield (c) (Farm 2). SC was fed at 56 g/cow/d (Diamond V Original XP, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA). Note: symbols on the top of standard error bars indicate the significance of the differences between data for control and SC treatment.

Effect of SC on free LPS concentration in blood and feces

The effects of SC supplementation on free LPS levels in blood and feces are shown in Table 5. Supplementation of SC tended to decrease (p = 0.07) LPS in plasma in Farm 2, with only a numerical reduction (p = 0.207) in Farm 1. Plasma LPS concentration increased (p<0.05) as DIM progresses (Figure 3). Supplementation of SC did not affect (p>0.05) fecal LPS concentrations. Effect of DIM on fecal LPS concentration was not clearly ascertained. There was a significant increase in fecal LPS with increasing DIM on Farm 1 (p<0.001), while no significant change was observed in Farm 2. In addition, there was no significant (p>0.10) SC by DIM interaction for LPS levels in plasma and feces.

Effect of yeast culture supplementation (SC)1 on LPS concentration (EU/ml)2 in plasma and feces

Figure 3

Effect of DIM on plasma lipopolysaccharide (LPS) concentration (Endotoxin Unit (EU)/ml).

DISCUSSION

A recent meta-analysis conducted by Poppy et al. (2012) has shown that SC increases production performance of lactating dairy cows. The increase in milk production estimated for cows fed SC in peer reviewed studies was 1.2 kg/d more milk, 1.6 kg/d more 3.5% FCM or 1.7 kg/d more energy corrected milk. Dry matter intake was estimated to increase by 0.6 kg/d in cows less than 70 DIM and decreased by 0.8 kg/d in cows later in lactation. In the present study, supplementation of SC significantly improved milk yield on both farms. The range of increase in milk production (1.0 kg/d in Farm 1 and 1.4 kg/d in Farm 2) is consistent with the results of the meta-analysis (1.2 kg/d, Poppy et al., 2012). These effects of SC may be due to the stabilizing effect on rumen fermentation, such as increasing lactate-utilizing bacteria (Callaway and Martin, 1997). The stabilized rumen condition allows increased growth and activity of fiber-digesting bacteria (Harrison et al., 1988), resulting in improved fiber digestion (Yoon and Garrett, 1998).

The meta-analysis also reported that SC increased milk fat yield (0.06 kg/d; p = 0.009) and milk protein yield (0.03 kg/d; p = 0.026). However, the paper did not report changes in percentage of milk fat or protein. In the present study, percentage of milk fat was positively affected by SC supplementation (3.12 to 3.24% in Farm 1 and 2.79 to 3.11% in Farm 2). The percentage of milk protein also was positively affected by SC supplementation (2.97 to 3.00% in Farm 1 and 2.97 to 3.08% in Farm 2). These positive effects on percentages of milk fat and protein along with increased milk production resulted in increased milk fat yield (0.06 kg/d in Farm 1 and 0.11 kg/d in Farm 2) and milk protein yield (0.03 kg/d in Farm 1 and 0.06 kg/d in Farm 2) and supports the results seen in the meta-analysis of Poppy et al. (2012).

Average DM intake was approximately 18.8 kg/d in this study. Effect of SC on DM intake is dependent on the status of energy balance of cows. When cows were under negative energy balance (<70 DIM), SC increased DMI. However, under positive energy balance (>70 DIM), SC decreased DMI (Poppy et al., 2012). The present study showed DMI in SC supplemented cows was similar to that of non-supplemented group when averaged for cows from 20 to 140 DIM. However, there was a trend of reducing DMI for cows supplemented with SC compared to control cows as the lactation progressed on Farm 1 but not on Farm 2. Therefore, it was noteworthy that, in the present study, even though the TMR contained 45% to 48% forage, there were not grossly overloaded with concentrates, the SC supplementation still had a significant beneficial effect on lactation performance in both farms. This indicated that the SC supplementation enabled better presentation of the nutritional value of feeds, to increase the concentrate may not be the necessary way to improve the lactation performance considering the health of dairy cows.

Previous research reported that LPS, an endotoxin, could stimulate localized or systemic inflammation via the activation of pattern recognition receptors (Emmanuel et al., 2008). Additionally, LPS and inflammation can regulate intestinal epithelial function by altering integrity, nutrient transport and utilization. The gastrointestinal tract is a large reservoir of both Gram-positive and negative bacteria, of which the Gram-negative bacteria serve as a source of LPS. Recent research has shown that feeding of high concentrate diets is associated with activation of a non-specific acute-phase reaction (APR) in both dairies (Emmanuel et al., 2008; Khafipour et al., 2009) and beef cattle (Ametaj et al., 2009). The reason for the activation of a systemic APR is that translocation of LPS into the systemic circulation stimulates the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6 by liver macrophages (Gabay and Kushner, 1999). This results in enhanced secretion of acute phase proteins (APP) like LPS-binding protein (LBP), serum amyloid A (SAA), and C-reactive protein from hepatocytes (Emmanuel et al., 2008).

Rumen pH is believed to play a modulatory role on the release and accumulation of LPS due to its effects on metabolic processes and changes in the cell membrane of rumen bacteria, maintenance of bacterial ecological balances, and on other physiological functions of the rumen (Russell and Rychlik, 2001). Ametaj et al. (2010) observed that a strong negative relationship between preprandial rumen pH and concentration of LPS in the rumen fluid. Thus, rumen pH modifiers could affect the endotoxin concentration. A previous study showed that SC supplementation to cows in early lactation decreased plasma LPS concentration at 20, 40 and 60 d of feeding (Luo et al., 2005). More recently, Li et al. (2012) reported a reduction of ruminal LPS concentration for cows supplemented with yeast culture when cows were subjected to a sub-acute ruminal acidosis induction. In our study, SC supplementation tended to decrease plasma LPS levels. This effect of SC may be partly explained by the stabilizing effect on rumen fermentation as mentioned early.

CONCLUSION

Supplementation of SC to lactating dairy cows significantly improved yield of milk and milk components without affecting DMI, which resulted in improved feed efficiency. Plasma LPS concentrations tended to increase as lactation progressed until 140 DIM. Supplemental SC did not influence LPS concentrations although numerical trend toward reducing the plasma LPS concentrations were noted.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funds from Diamond V (Cedar Rapids, IA). The authors thank Weiguo Liu (Department of Animal Science, Anhui Institute of Science and Technology, Anhui) for providing the experimental cows from the commercial dairy farms.

References

Ametaj BN, Koenig KM, Dunn SM, Yang WZ, Zebeli Q, Beauchemin KA. 2009;Backgrounding and finishing diets are associated with inflammatory responses in feedlot steers. J Anim Sci 87:1314–1320.
Ametaj BN, Zebeli Q, Iqbal S. 2010;Nutrition, microbiota, and endotoxin-related diseases in dairy cows. R Bras Zootec 39:433–444.
AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis 15th ednth ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists; Arlington, Virginia:
Callaway ES, Martin SA. 1997;Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose. J Dairy Sci 80:2035–2044.
Emmanuel DG, Dunn SM, Ametaj BN. 2008;Feeding high proportions of barley grain stimulates an inflammatory response in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 91:606–614.
Gabay C, Kushner I. 1999;Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med 340:448–454.
Gozho GN, Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Kennedy AD, Wittenberg KM. 2005;Subacute ruminal acidosis induces ruminal lipopolysaccharide endotoxin release and triggers an inflammatory response. J Dairy Sci 88:1399–1403.
Harrison GA, Hemken RW, Dawson KA, Harmon RJ, Barker KB. 1988;Influence of addition of yeast culture supplement to diets of lactating cows on ruminal fermentation and microbial populations. J Dairy Sci 71:2967–2975.
Khafipour E, Krause DO, Plaizier JC. 2009;A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation. J Dairy Sci 92:1060–1070.
Krishnamoorthy U, Muscato TV, Sniffen CJ, Van Soest PJ. 1982;Nitrogen fractions of selected feedstuffs. J Dairy Sci 65:217–225.
Li S, Khafipour E, Krause DO, Kroeker A, Rodriguez-Lecompte JC, Gozho GN, Plaizier JC. 2012;Effects of subacute ruminal acidosis challenges on fermentation and endotoxins in the rumen and hindgut of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 95:294–303.
Li S, Krause DO, Khafipour E, Plaizier JC. 2010. Does Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) affect fermentation in the hind Gut? WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology 22380. (Abstr.).
Li S, Tesfaye E, Khazane-hei H, Scott M, Yoon I, Khafipour E, Plaizier JC. 2012. Impact of feeding yeast culture under normal and SARA conditions in lactating dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci 90(Suppl. 3)485. (Abstr.).
Longuski RA, Ying Y, Allen MS. 2009;Yeast culture supplementation prevented milk fat depression by a short-term dietary challenge with fermentable starch. J Dairy Sci 92:160–167.
Luo AZ, Qi CM, Chen HL, Bo L, Wang XQ, Yan Q. 2005;Influence of Yikang XP on plasma endotoxin concentration and additional indexes in lactating cows (Chinese). China Dairy Cattle 2:12–15.
Miller-Webster T, Hoover WH, Holt M, Nocek JE. 2002;Influence of yeast culture on ruminal microbial metabolism in continuous culture. J Dairy Sci 85:2009–2014.
National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle 7th Edth ed. National Academy Press. Washington, DC:
Pejsak Z, Tarasiuk K. 1989;The occurrence of endotoxin in sows with coliform mastitis. Theriogenology 32:335–341.
Poppy GD, Rabiee AR, Lean IJ, Sanchez WK, Dorton KL, Morley PS. 2012;A meta-analysis of the effects of feeding yeast culture produced by anaerobic fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on milk production of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 95:6027–6041.
Russell JB, Rychlik JL. 2001;Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology. Science 292:1119–1122.
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991;Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597.
Yoon I, Garrett JE. 1998;Yeast culture and processing effects on 24-hour in situ ruminal degradation of corn silage. Proceeding of World Animal Production Conference 1:322–323.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Interaction between SC and DIM on percentage of milk fat (Farm 1). SC was fed at 56 g/cow/d (Diamond V Original XP, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA). Note: symbol on the top of standard error bars indicate the significance of the differences between data for control and SC treatment.

Figure 2

Interaction between SC and DIM on percentage of milk fat (a) and milk protein (b), and milk yield (c) (Farm 2). SC was fed at 56 g/cow/d (Diamond V Original XP, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA). Note: symbols on the top of standard error bars indicate the significance of the differences between data for control and SC treatment.

Figure 3

Effect of DIM on plasma lipopolysaccharide (LPS) concentration (Endotoxin Unit (EU)/ml).

Table 1

Ingredient and nutrient compositions of experimental diets

Ingredients (% of DM)1 Farm 1 Farm 2
Alfalfa hay 15.0 12.0
Leymus chinensis 3.0 9.0
Wheat straw 5.0 9.0
Maize silage 25.0 15.0
Maize 27.0 30.0
Wheat bran 3.0 1.4
Soybean meal 12.85 15.0
Cottonseed meal 6.0 5.0
Calcium carbonate 0.4 0.85
Calcium hydrogen phosphate 0.75 0.75
Sodium bicarbonate 0.75 0.75
Sodium chloride 0.5 0.5
Dairy premix2 0.75 0.75
Nutrient composition (% of DM)
  NEL (Mcal/kg of DM) 1.59 1.63
  Crude protein 15.4 15.9
  Neutral detergent fiber 38.9 28.7
  Acid detergent fiber 26.0 23.2
  Non-fiber carbohydrates 37.1 38.3
  Calcium 0.89 0.85
  Phosphorous 0.52 0.56
1

Fed as TMR.

2

Contained: Mn, 0.24%; K, 0.5%; S, 0.2%; Zn, 4,000 mg/kg; Cu, 1,000 mg/kg; Mn, 2,500 mg/kg; I, 64 mg/kg; Co, 5 mg/kg; vitamin A, 1,000,000 IU/kg; vitamin D, 3,000,000 IU/kg; and vitamin E, 82,000 IU/kg.

Table 2

Pre-trial (d 0) milk yield, dry matter intake and fecal and plasma LPS

Control SC1 SEM p-value
Farm 1
  Milk yield (kg/d) 19.6 19.8 0.329 0.730
  Dry matter intake (kg/d) 19.2 18.9 0.197 0.352
  Fecal LPS (EU/ml)2 7,326 7,290 709 0.976
  Plasma LPS (EU/ml) 2 0.46 0.46 0.152 0.990
Farm 2
  Milk yield (kg/d) 21.5 21.7 0.542 0.835
  Dry matter intake (kg/d) 18.9 18.9 0.175 0.874
  Fecal LPS (EU/ml) 2 6,668 7,984 665 0.283
  Plasma LPS (EU/ml) 2 0.24 0.15 0.031 0.157
1

SC = 56 g/cow/d, Diamond V Original XP, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA.

2

LPS = Lipopolysaccharide. EU = Endotoxin unit.

Table 3

Effect of yeast culture supplementation (SC)1 on milk yield and milk composition on Farm 1

Item Control SC SEM p-value
SC DIM SC×DIM
Dry matter intake (kg/d) 18.7 19.0 0.211 0.505 0.436 0.417
Milk yield (kg/d) 19.5 20.4 0.226 0.009 <0.001 0.084
Milk fat (%) 3.12 3.24 0.052 0.219 0.170 0.003
Milk protein (%) 2.97 3.00 0.017 0.376 0.001 0.377
Milk fat yield (kg/d) 0.60 0.66 0.008 0.003 0.008 0.79
Milk protein yield (kg/d) 0.58 0.61 0.009 0.005 <0.001 0.169
3.5% FCM (kg/d) 18.1 19.5 0.211 0.001 <0.001 0.408
Feed efficiency 0.99 1.04 0.016 0.165 0.054 0.265
1

SC = 56 g/cow/d, Diamond V Original XP, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA.

Table 4

Effect of yeast culture supplementation (SC)1 on milk yield and milk composition on Farm 2

Item Control SC SEM p-value
SC DIM SC×DIM
Dry matter intake (kg/d) 18.5 18.8 0.182 0.313 0.035 0.061
Milk yield (kg/d) 18.0 19.4 0.412 0.017 <0.001 0.028
Milk fat (%) 2.79 3.11 0.065 0.009 0.008 0.049
Milk protein (%) 2.97 3.08 0.012 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Milk fat yield (kg/d) 0.50 0.61 0.019 0.002 0.001 0.371
Milk protein yield (kg/d) 0.53 0.59 0.013 0.001 <0.001 0.030
3.5% FCM (kg/d) 15.9 18.3 0.338 0.002 0.035 0.362
Feed efficiency 0.87 0.99 0.020 0.011 <0.001 0.218
1

SC = 56 g/cow/d, Diamond V Original XP, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA.

Table 5

Effect of yeast culture supplementation (SC)1 on LPS concentration (EU/ml)2 in plasma and feces

Treatment
SEM p-value
Control SC SC DIM SC×DIM
Plasma
  Farm 1 0.77 0.62 0.098 0.207 0.001 0.307
  Farm 2 0.26 0.13 0.043 0.070 0.005 0.115
Feces
  Farm 1 6,915 5,748 634 0.239 <0.001 0.327
  Farm 2 9,643 9,137 901 0.800 0.923 0.761
1

SC = 56 g/cow/d, Diamond V Original XP, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA.

2

LPS = Lipopolysaccharide. EU = Endotoxin unit.