Go to Top Go to Bottom
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci > Volume 26(10); 2013 > Article
Lee, Lee, Lee, Oh, Jeong, and Kim: Identification of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) of the Bovine Growth Hormone (bGH) Gene Associated with Growth and Carcass Traits in Hanwoo

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find any association of the bovine growth hormone (bGH) gene with growth and carcass quality traits in Korean native cattle, Hanwoo. Genomic DNA was extracted from 21 Hanwoo individuals, and the 47 to 2,528 bp region of the bGH 2,856 bp (GenBank accession number M57764) including the promoter and the five exons was sequenced. A total of ten bGH SNPs were confirmed, including four (253 C>T, 303 C>T, 502 C>T, and 559 G>A) in the promoter, one (679 C>T) in exon 1, one (1,692 T>C) in intron 3, and four (2141 C>G, 2258 C>T, 2277 C>T, and 2291 A>C) in exon 5. The ten bGH SNPs were genotyped for a sample of 242 Hanwoo steers and association tests were performed to find any significant SNP that was correlated with growth and carcass quality. Of the SNPs, the 303 C>T SNP in the promoter region was significantly associated with 6-month-old weight, the 559 G>A SNP with longissimus dorsi muscle area, the 2141 C>G SNP in exon 5 with daily weight gain, and the 2258 C>T SNP with daily weight gain and carcass weight (p<0.05). The significant SNPs need to be verified in other Hanwoo populations before considering implementation of marker-assisted selection for genetic improvement of growth and carcass quality in Hanwoo.

INTRODUCTION

The bovine growth hormone (bGH) gene is located in q22 of bovine chromosome 19 and includes five exons with 217 amino acids (Santome et al., 1971; Wallis, 1973; Miller et al., 1980). The gene was sequenced by Gordon et al. (1983) and Hediger et al. (1990). Its product, growth hormone, is secreted in somatotropic or acidophilic cells of the anterior pituitary gland of mammals. The hormone regulates expression of many genes including one encoding insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), and influences growth rate, body composition, health, and milk production (Woychik et al., 1982; Gordon et al., 1983; Sumantran et al., 1992; Ho and Hoffman, 1993; Lincoln et al., 1995; Ge et al., 2013). In general, GH binds to a GH receptor and forms a dimer. Janus kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase are involved in GH activity (Herrington et al., 2000). Recently, studies of the bGH gene have focused on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the gene and how the polymorphisms influence production traits such as milk production, growth, or carcass traits in cattle.
Roth et al. (1990) found a SNP in the bGH promoter region, ‘253’ SNP near the binding site of polyoma virus enhancer A binding protein 3 (PEA3) transcription factor. Theill and Karin (1993) identified ‘303’ SNP in the first nucleotide of biding site of another transcription factor, thyroid hormone response element (TRE). The 303 SNP was confirmed in eight cattle breeds (Hecht and Geldermann, 1996). Ge et al. (2013) analyzed effects of the bGH SNPs on growth traits and concentrations of IGF-I in Angus, but did not find significant evidence that the SNPs were associated with the traits. However, Kim et al. (2004) reported a bGH SNP, ‘-120’ SNP in promoter region of the gene, which was associated with 3-month weight and carcass weight in Hanwoo.
There are also many reports that bGH SNPs, especially ones in exon 5, influenced milk production in Holstein and economically important traits in beef cattle (Eppard et al., 1992; Zhang et al., 1992, 1993; Lee et al., 1993; Lucy et al., 1993; Schlee et al., 1994; Yao et al., 1996). The 2141 C>G SNP encoding the 127th amino acid of bGH involves a change from leucine (CTG) to valine (GTG) (Zhang et al., 1992, 1993; Lucy et al., 1993). For the SNP, Eppard et al. (1992) found that the GTG increased milk yields in Holstein. However, Lee et al. (1993) and Lucy et al. (1993) reported that the mutation to valine decreased milk yield in cattle. Schlee et al. (1994) demonstrated that German black and white bulls with homozygous leucine had higher plasma levels than the ones with heterozygous leucine. Yao et al. (1996) reported that the 2291 A>C bGH SNP was significantly associated with milk yield, fat, and protein content in Holstein cattle. Recently, Ardiyanti et al. (2012) reported association of bGH to fatty acid components in Japanese black cattle.
Yoon et al. (2003) found a 2258 C>T SNP of bGH in Hanwoo, causing replacement of arginine (CGG) with tryptophan (TGG). Chikuni et al. (1994) also reported a 2277 C>T SNP in bGH in Japanese cattle.
The objective of this study was to find any association of bGH SNPs with growth and carcass traits in Hanwoo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and phenotype data

A sample of 242 Hanwoo steers from 25 sires was collected from the Korea Animal Improvement Association. All the steers were under the progeny-testing program to select Hanwoo proven sires in the National Livestock Research Institute (NLRI), Korea. The steers were raised under tightly controlled conditions of the feeding program in the Daekwanryeong and Namwon branches of NLRI. The animals were born between the spring of 1998 and the fall of 2002, castrated at 6 months of age, and raised in groups of four animals per pen (4 m×8 m). After 6 months of age, the steers were fed concentrates consisting of 15% crude protein (CP)/71% totally digestible nutrients (TDN) for a period of 60 to 90 d, 15% CP/71% TDN for a period of 180 d, and 13% CP/72% TDN for a period of 90 to 120 d. The steers had access to roughage and fresh water ad libitum throughout the entire period. All steers were slaughtered approximately at 24 months of age. Live weight of each steer was measured before slaughter using electronic scales. Following a 24-h chilling, cold carcass weight was also measured.
Growth traits included weights of six-month (WT6), 12-month (WT12), 18-month (WT18), and 24-month (WT24) of age. Average daily gain (ADG) was also measured. Carcass quality traits included carcass weight (CWT), backfat thickness (BF), longissimus dorsi (eye) muscle area (EMA), and marbling scores (MS). According to the protocols of Korean Animal Product Grade System of Korean Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation, BF (mm) was measured at the 2/3 point of backfat that was located toward abdomen along the right side of the eye muscle cross-section. EMA (cm2) was measured in the eye muscle cross-section. MS was scored on a scale of 1 thorough 9 (1 = trace, 9 = very abundant) according to the Korean Beef Marbling Standard.

Sequence analysis of bGH gene

Genomic DNA was extracted from white blood cells of 21 unrelated Hanwoo individuals using the phenolchloroform method (Sambrook et al., 2001). We sequenced 47 bp to 2,528 bp of the bGH gene (GenBank accession number, M57764) and the flanking regions to evaluate SNP variants using the BigDye Terminator (ver. 3.1) cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with an ABI 3730XL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Six primer sets for amplification and sequencing analysis were designed based on the GenBank sequence using Primer3 software. Primer sequences are shown in Table 1. Sequence editing was performed by visual confirmation using Sequencher 4.6 software (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI).

Genotyping by single-base extension (SBE)

A primer set (GH-P1-F and GH1-P1-R) was designed to generate a 639-bp product that included four SNPs in the bGH gene promoter. Another primer set (GH-E1-F and GH-E1-R) was designed to generate a 328-bp product that included 679-bp SNP in the exon 1 region. A third primer set (GH-E2-F and GH-E2-R) was designed to produce a 536-bp amplicon that included 1,692-bp SNP in intron 3, while a primer set (GH-E3-F and GH-E3-R) was designed to obtain a 428-bp product that included four SNPs in exon 4 (Table 1). Primer extension was performed using a SNaPshot ddNTP Primer Extension Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). To purify the primer extension products, exonuclease 1 and shrimp alkaline phosphatase were added to the reaction mixtures. The samples were incubated at 37°C for 1 h and the reactions were stopped by incubating at 72°C for 15 min. The products were mixed with a Genescan 120 LIZ standard and HiDi formamide (Applied Biosystems) before being denatured at 95°C for 5 min. Electrophoresis was performed using an ABI PRISM 3130XL Genetic Analyzer and the results were analyzed using GeneMapper v.4.0 software (Applied Biosystems).

Statistical analysis

Heterozygosity, minor allele frequency (MAF), and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were assessed using Haploviewer v4.2 (Barret et al., 2005). HWE was tested by comparing the expected and observed genotype frequencies using a chi-square test. Associations of growth and carcass traits for each SNP were analyzed with a mixed analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) linear model using SAS v9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). For growth traits, two fixed effect were fitted, year-season-birth place and SNP genotype. For carcass quality traits, an additional effect was included in the model, a covariate for age in days at the time of slaughter.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The DNA segment of 2,482 bps that was located at 47 to 2,528 bp of bGH gene was sequenced, and a total of 10 SNPs were identified (Figure 1 and Table 2). Among the ten SNPs, four SNPs were located in the promoter region, i.e. 253 C>T, 303 C>T, 502 C>T, and 559 G>A. Results of association tests between the four SNPs and growth and carcass traits showed that 303 C>T and 559 G>A SNPs had significantly affected WT6 and eye muscle area (EMA), respectively at p = 0.05 level (Tables 3 and 4). The significant SNPs in the bGH gene promoter region may have limited efficiency as molecular markers, partly because the SNPs are located in the SINE/BovA2 repeat element, in which repetitive mutations occur frequently (Vaccarelli et al., 2008), suggesting that the SNPs does not strongly influence gene expression. Alternatively, the SNPs may affect growth and carcass traits due to great linkage disequilibrium with the causal variants that were closely located to the bGH SNPs (Ge et al., 2013). Kim et al. (2004) reported that a SNP at a promoter position -120 spanning a DraI restriction site was associated with 3-month weight and carcass weight in a Hanwoo population. However, our study did not confirm the SNP, partly because the SNP in Kim et al. (2004) was not detected with strong statistical evidence, i.e. comparison-wise p values were 0.025 and 0.041 for 3-month weight and carcass weight, respectively, which may be not confirmed in another random Hanwoo sample. Also, Kim et al. (2004) analyzed the association tests with estimated breeding values of the growth and carcass quality traits, while raw phenotypes were used in this study.
In this study, 679 C>T SNP was found in exon 1, 1692 T>C SNP in intron 3, and four SNPs (2141 C>G, 2258 C>T, 2277 C>T, and 2291 A>C) in exon 5 of the bGH gene. Among the SNPs in the CDS region, the 2141 C>G, the 2258 C>T, and the 2277 C>T SNPs were non-synonymous causing amino acid substitution, while the 2291 A>C SNP was a silent mutation. Among the SNPs in exon 1 and intron 3, 679 C>T and 1692 T>C did not significantly influence any growth or carcass trait (Tables 3 and 4). These results are in accordance with the report of Yao et al. (1996), in which there was no significant association of the SNPs with milk yield, fat and protein content in Holstein bulls.
The 2141 C>G SNP was non-synonymous and induced a mutation from leucine (CTG) to valine (GTG), which significantly affected ADG at p = 0.05 level (Table 3), even if HWE for the SNP was significantly deviated from expectation (Table 2). The 2258 C>T SNP was non-synonymous, causing mutation of arginine to tryptophan in the process of transition from C to T. The SNP significantly affected ADG and CWT at p = 0.05 level (Tables 3 and 4). The genotype effect of the 2258 SNP on ADG was 0.74±0.01 for CC and 0.71±0.01 for CT, respectively (Table 3). For CWT, the estimates of CC and CT genotypes were 310.4±2.4 and 298.5±4.9, respectively (Table 4). For the SNP, Yoon et al. (2003) reported that MAF, Msp I (-), was low (0.00 to 0.054) in European Bos taurus species (Hereford, Angus, Charolais, Holstein, brown Swiss, Limousine, and Simmental), 0.043 to 0.229 in Asian Bos taurus breeds, except for Japanese black cattle (0.00), and 0.162 in Hanwoo. The MAF (C allele) of the 2258 SNP was 0.084 in this study (Table 4), which was lower than the frequency of the SNP in Yoon et al. (2003). This may be partly due to sampling effect, i.e. a small sample size (N = 242) in this study. For the 2258 C>T SNP, the high allele frequency of the favorable allele (C) in both European and Asian Bos taurus breeds indicate that selection for genetic improvement of ADG and CWT has been processed for the SNP or near the chromosomal region of the SNP.
There are some limitations in this association study. First of all, the sample size was small (N = 242), such that some significant SNPs for growth and carcass quality traits may not have been detected. Second, there may have been a chance of a false positive SNP, i.e. spurious SNPs with significant evidence that have no true effects on the tested traits. Some significant SNPs, e.g. the 303 C>T SNP for WT6 or the 2258 C>T SNP for CWT (Tables 3 and 4), had MAF less than 0.05, for which efficiency of marker-assisted selection would not be high.
Our results indicate that four SNPs in the bGH gene were associated with growth and carcass quality traits in Hanwoo (Tables 3 and 4). However, further study is needed to validate effects of the significant SNPs, before considering implementation of marker-assisted selection in Hanwoo commercial populations.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by a grant titled as “Development of production technologies for high quality & nutrional values of beef in Hanwoo from the Technology Development Program for Agriculture and Forestry (Project No. 311016-3), Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, Republic of Korea. Jong-Joo Kim’s work was also supported by the Yeungnam University Research Grant 2012.

Figure 1.
Position of SNPs in the bovine growth hormone (bGH) gene in Hanwoo.
ajas-26-10-1359-1f1.gif
Table 1.
Sequences of primers for sequencing the bovine growth hormone (bGH) gene in Hanwoo
Primer name Primer size (bp) Primer sequence Location Fragment size (bp) Annealing temp (°C)
Sequencing GH1-N1 F 20 CCAGGGATTGAACCTGAGTC 47–558 512 56
R 21 CCATTAGCACAGGCTGCCAGT 56
GH1-N2 F 20 AGTGGAGACGGGATGATGAC 451–972 522 56
R 21 CCTCCTGGTCTCTCCCTAGGC 56
GH1-N3 F 21 CATTTGGCCAAGTTTGAAATG 852–1,413 562 56
R 20 CATCCAGAACACCCAGGTTG 56
GH1-N4 F 18 AACCGCGCACCAGCTTAG 1,314–1,839 526 56
R 20 GAGAAGCTGAAGGACCTGGA 56
GH1-N5 F 20 TCTCACTGCTCCTCATCCAG 1,722–2,186 465 56
R 20 GCAGATCCTCAAGCAGACCT 56
GH1-N6 F 20 CTTCGGCCTCTCTGTCTCTC 2,105–2,528 424 56
R 21 GAAGACAATAGCAGGCATGCT 56
Genotyping GH1-P1 F 20 CCAGGGATTGAACCTGAGTC 639 62
R 20 TGAGTCGTCTGGTGAACTGG 62
GH1-E1 F 20 ACGGGAACAGGATGAGTGAG 328 58
R 20 CACATTCGGAAGCCCTAAAG 58
GH1-E2 F 20 CAGGTTGCCTTCTGCTTCTC 536 58
R 20 CGTGCATTCTCCTGGCTAAG 58
GH1-E3 F 20 TTTTCCCCTTTTGAAACCTC 428 54
R 20 CGATGCAATTTCCTCATTTT 54
Table 2.
Genotype and allele frequencies of SNPs within the bGH gene of Hanwoo
SNP Position Genotype allele frequency (No. of individuals) No. of individuals MAF1 H2 HWE3
253 C>T Promoter CC(131) 0.557 CT(82) 0.349 TT(22) 0.094 235 0.268 0.392 0.089
303 C>T Promoter CC(202) 0.860 CT(28) 0.119 TT(5) 0.021 235 0.081 0.149 0.002
502 C>T Promoter CC(152) 0.647 CT(74) 0.315 TT(9) 0.038 235 0.196 0.315 0.999
559 G>A Promoter GG(231) 0.983 GA(4) 0.017 AA(0) 0.000 235 0.009 0.017 0.895
679 C>T Exon1 CC(225) 0.978 CT(5) 0.022 TT(0) 0.000 230 0.011 0.022 0.868
1692 T>C Intron3 CC(5) 0.024 CT(56) 0.269 TT(147) 0.707 208 0.159 0.267 0.903
2141 C>G Exon5 CC(196) 0.848 CG(27) 0.117 GG(8) 0.035 231 0.093 0.169 0.000
2258 C>T Exon5 CC(192) 0.831 CT(39) 0.169 TT(0) 0.000 231 0.084 0.155 0.161
2277 C>T Exon5 CC(222) 0.961 CT(9) 0.039 TT(0) 0.000 231 0.019 0.038 0.763
2291 A>C Exon5 CC(10) 0.043 CA(67) 0.290 AA(154) 0.667 231 0.188 0.306 0.436

1 Heterozygosity.

2 Minor allele frequency.

3 p value indicates degree of deviation of genotype distribution from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Table 3.
Least square mean and standard error of genotype effects of bGH gene for growth traits in Hanwoo
SNP Traits (kg) Genotype means±standard errors (No. of individuals) p-value
303 C>T CC(202) CT(28) TT(5)
WT6 168.51±1.77b 170.53±4.68b 137.81±11.01a 0.019
WT12 277.35±2.27 284.18±5.985 261.69±14.07 0.275
WT18 411.72±2.98 428.40±7.855 404.56±18.46 0.114
WT24 564.35±4.03 577.10±10.64 594.13±25.00 0.284
ADG 0.73±0.01 0.75±0.02 0.81±0.04 0.062
2141 C>G CC(196) CG(27) GG(8)
WT6 168.02±1.78 167.95±4.73 149.54±8.55 0.103
WT12 276.60±2.34 281.04±6.20 276.18±11.21 0.788
WT18 410.86±3.09 420.74±8.19 418.93±14.80 0.470
WT24 562.55±4.13 566.09±10.95 596.31±19.79 0.241
ADG 0.73±0.01a 0.74±0.02a 0.81±0.03b 0.038
2258 C>T CC(192) CT(39) TT(0)
WT6 167.25±1.89 168.46±3.84 0.779
WT12 278.02±2.46 273.14±4.99 0.381
WT18 414.89±3.23 400.85±6.56 0.057
WT24 567.62±4.33 548.59±8.79 0.054
ADG 0.74±0.01b 0.71±0.01a 0.015

a,b Mean values with different superscript letters within the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).

Table 4.
Least square mean and standard error of genotype effects of bGH gene for carcass quality traits in Hanwoo
SNP Traits Genotype means±standard errors (No. of individuals) p-value
559 G>A GG(231) GA(4) AA(0)
CWT (kg) 309.62±2.18 296.37±15.44 0.397
LMA (cm2) 76.17±0.55 b 67.89±3.89 a 0.037
BF (mm) 7.10±0.19 7.80±1.36 0.614
MS 5.82±0.23 3.89±1.65 0.249
2258 C>T CC(192) CT(39) TT(0)
CWT (kg) 310.41±2.41b 298.50±4.93 a 0.031
LMA (cm2) 76.11±0.61 74.93±1.24 0.392
BF (mm) 6.97±0.21 7.40±0.44 0.375
MS 5.79±0.27 5.48±0.54 0.615

a,b Mean values with different superscript letters within the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).

REFERENCES

Ardiyanti A, Abe T, Tameoka N, Kobayashi E, Shoji N, Ohtani Y, Suzuki K, Roh S, Katoh K. 2012. Effects of growth hormone gene polymorphism on lipogenic gene expression levels in diaphragm tissues of Japanese black heifers. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 25:1055–1062.
crossref pmid pmc
Chikuni K, Nagatsuma T, Tabata T, Monma M, Saito M, Ozawa S, Ozutsumi K. 1994. Genetic variants of the growth hormone gene in Japanese cattle. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Jpn) 65:340–346.

Choi YJ, Yim DS, Cho JS, Cho BD, Na KJ, Baik MG. 1997. Analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism in the bovine growth hormone gene related to growth performance and carcass quality of Korean native cattle. Meat Sci 45:405–410.
crossref pmid
Eppard PJ, Nenthe LA, Violan BN, Ganguli S, Hintz RL, Kung L, Krivi GG, Lanza GM. 1992. Comparison of the galactopoietic response to pituitary-derived and recombinant-derived variants of bovine growth hormone. J Endocrinol 132:47–56.
crossref pmid
Ferraz AL, Bortolossi JC, Curi RA, Ferro MIT, Ferro JA, Furlan LR. 2006. Identification and characterization of polymorphisms within the 5′ flanking region, first exon and part of first intron of bovine GH gene. J Anim Breed Genet 123:208–212.
crossref pmid
Ge W, Davis ME, Hines HC, Irvin KM, Simmen RC. 2003. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the growth hormone and growth hormone receptor genes with blood serum insulin-like growth factor I concentration and growth traits in Angus cattle. J Anim Sci 81:641–648.
crossref pmid
Gordon DF, Quick DP, Erwin CR, Donelson JE, Maurer RA. 1983. Nucleotide sequence of the bovine growth hormone chromosomal gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol 33:81–95.
crossref pmid
Hecht C, Geldermann H. 1996. Variants within the 5′-flanking region and intron I of the bovine growth hormone gene. Anim Genet 27:329–332.
pmid
Hediger R, Johnson SE, Barendse W, Drinkwater RD, Moore SS, Hetzel J. 1990. Assignment of the growth hormone gene locus to 19q26-qter in cattle and to 11q25-qter in sheep by in situ hybridization. Genomics 8:171–174.
crossref pmid
Herrington J, L , Smit S, Schwartz J, Carter-Su C. 2000. The role of STAT proteins in growth hormone signaling. Oncogene 19:2585–97.
crossref pmid
Ho KK, Hoffman DM. 1993. Aging and growth hormone. Horm Res 40:80–86.
crossref pmid
Kim NK, Seo YW, Kim GH, Joh JH, Kim OH, Chung ER, Lee CS. 2004. A previously unreported DraI polymorphism within the regulatory region of the bovine growth hormone gene and its association with growth traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle. Anim Genet 35:152–154.
crossref pmid
Lee BK, Lin GF, Crooker BA, Murtaugh MP, Hansen LB, Chgester-Jones H. 1996. Association of somatotropin (BST) gene polymorphism at the 5th exon with selection for milk yield in Holstein cows. Domest Anim Endocrinol 13:373–381.
crossref pmid
Lincoln DT, Sinowatz F, El-Hifnawi E, Hughes RL, Waters M. 1995. Evidence of a direct role for growth hormone (GH) in mammary gland proliferation and lactation. Anat Histol Embryol 24:107–115.
crossref pmid
Lucy MC, Hauser SD, Eppard PJ, Krivi GG, Clark JH, Bauman DE, Collier RJ. 1993. Variants of somatotropin in cattle: gene frequencies in major dairy breeds and associated milk production. Domest Anim Endocrinol 10:325–333.
crossref pmid
Miller WL, Martial JA, Baxter JD. 1980. Molecular cloning of DNA complementary to bovine growth hormone mRNA. J Biol Chem 255:7521–7524.
pmid
Roth P, Nerlov C, Blasi R, Johnsen M. 1990. Transcription factor PEA3 participates in the induction of urokinase plasminogen activator transcription in murine kerainocytes stimulated with epidermal growth factor or phorbolester. Nucl Acid Res 18:5009–5017.
crossref pmid pmc
Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. 1:3rd edCold Spring Harbor; New York: p. 6.4–6.12.

Santome JA, Dellacha JM, Paladini AC, Wolfenstein CE, Pena C, Poskus E, Daurat ST, Biscoglio MJ, De Sese ZM, De Sanguesa AV. 1971. The amino acid sequence of bovine growth hormone. FEBS Lett 16:198–200.
crossref pmid
Schlee P, Graml R, Schallenberger E, Schams D, Rottmann O, Olbrich-Bludau A, Pirchner F. 1994. Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I concentrations in bulls of various growth hormone genotypes. Theor Appl Genet 88:497–500.
crossref pmid
Sumantran VN, Tsai ML, Schwartz J. 1992. Growth hormone induces c-fos and c-jun expression in cells with varying requirements for differentiation. Endocrinology 130:2016–2024.
crossref pmid
Theill LE, Karin M. 1993. Transcriptional control of GH expression and anterior pituitary development. Endocrine Rev 14:670–689.
crossref
Vaccarelli G, Maria CM, Rachele A, Graziano P, Salvatrice C. 2008. Genomic organization and recombinational unit duplication-driven evolution of ovine and bovine T cell receptor gamma loci. BMC Genomic 9:81
crossref pmid pmc
Wallis M. 1973. The primary structure of bovine growth hormone. FEBS Lett 35:11–14.
crossref pmid
Woychik RP, Camper SA, Lyons RH, Horowitz S, Goodwin EC, Rottman FM. 1982. Cloning and nucleotide sequencing of the bovine growth hormone gene. Nucl Acid Res 10:7197–7210.
crossref pmid pmc
Yao J, Aggrey SE, Zadworny D, Hayes JF, Kuhnlein U. 1996. Sequence variations in the bovine growth hormone gene characterized by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and their association with milk production traits in Holsteins. Genetics 144:1809–1816.
pmid pmc
Yoon DH, Kim TH, Lee KH, Park EW, Lee HK, Cheong IC, Hong KC. 2003. A missense mutation in exon 5 of the bovine growth hormone gene. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor) 45:13–22.
crossref
Zhang HM, Brown DR, Denise SK, Ax RL. 1992. Nucleotide sequence determination of a bovine somatotropin allele. Anim Genet 23:578
crossref pmid
Zhang HM, Maddock KC, Browns DR, Denise SK, Ax RL. 1993. Bovine growth hormone gene frequencies in samples of U.S. AI bulls (Abstr.). J. Anim. Sci 71:93



Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : jongkha@hotmail.com               

Copyright © 2019 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. All rights reserved.

Close layer
prev next