Go to Top Go to Bottom
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci > Accepted Articles
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0663    [Accepted] Published online October 22, 2019.
Effect of lines and floor type on growth performance and feather characterization during the growth period of White Roman geese
M. J. Lin1  , T. J. Chen2  , S. C. Chang3  , W. C. Lin4  , S. Y. Peng2  , Tzu-Tai Lee4,5,* 
1Changhua Animal Propagation Station, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan. Changhua 52149, Taiwan
2Department of Animal Science, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan
3Kaohsiung Animal Propagation Station, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan
4Department of Animal Science, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
5The iEGG and Animal Biotechnology Center, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan
Correspondence:  Tzu-Tai Lee, Tel: +886-4-22840366, Fax: +886-4-2286-0265, Email: ttlee@dragon.nchu.edu.tw
Received: 22 August 2019   • Revised: 7 September 2019   • Accepted: 14 October 2019
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to investigate goose growth and feather characteristics are influenced by its lines and feeding surroundings, inclusive of floor materials and types. Whereas, there is no any reports regarding to it, hence, this study is investigated to realize this issues.
Methods
The 240 White Roman geese which were hatched by sex identification from 3 commercial goose farms, and they were randomly distributed to 24 pens depending on a completely random design. The study is including 3 lines from commercial geese and 2 floor types (Cement strip floor (CSF) or Cement floor (CF)) treatments raising for 13 weeks.
Results
The day one gosling weight from A farm had lower than other two farms (96 g vs. 107 and 115 g; P<0.001). Afterwards, the body weight, back length, keel length, chest girth and main wing feather length among 3 farms showed no any significance prior to 12 weeks. The CF group shared heavier body weight, shorter back length, longer keel length, shorter chest girth and shorter main wing feather length than the other CSF group prior to 12 weeks. The down weight in the CF shared heavier than the other CSF group (57.1 g vs. 41.8 g; P<0.01) prior to 13 weeks.
Conclusion
The body weight shared the positive relations for dry feather weight (r=0.59), down weight (r=0.69), percent of the down weight of live body weight prior to 13 weeks (r=0.61).
Keywords: Line; Floor Material; Feather Characteristics; Growth Performance; White Roman Geese


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : jongkha@hotmail.com               

Copyright © 2019 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. All rights reserved.

Close layer
prev next