1. Montalbano M, Segreto R, Di Gerlando R, Mastrangelo S, Sardina MT. Quantitative determination of casein genetic variants in goat milk: Application in Girgentana dairy goat breed. Food Chem 2016; 192:760–4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.075
3. Cobb M. Generation: the seventeenth-century scientists who unraveled the secrets of sex, life, and growth. New York, USA: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2006.
5. Nagamalleswari Y, Iyyangar MP, Gopinath S, Raghavender KBP. Biometrical relationship of ovaries and pituitary during prepubertal period in goat (Capra hircus). Indian J Anim Sci 2004; 74:256–8.
7. Leyvaocariz H, Munro C, Stabenfeldt GH. Serum LH, FSH, estradiol-17-Beta and progesterone profiles of native and crossbred goats in a tropical semiarid zone of Venezuela during the estrous-cycle. Anim Reprod Sci 1995; 39:49–58.
8. Leboeuf B, Delgadillo JA, Manfredi E, et al. Controlling reproduction in selection schemes of dairy goats. Prod Anim 2008; 21:391–402.
9. Zhao Y, Luo N, Tan Q, Zhang Y, An B. The dynamic expression patterns and correlation of Tet1 and WNT pathway genes in early fetal tissues of goat. Reprod Domest Anim 2017; 52:65
11. Kominakis A, Rogdakis E, Koutsotolis K. Genetic parameters for milk yield and litter size in Boutsico dairy sheep. Can J Anim Sci 1998; 78:525–32.
https://doi.org/10.4141/A98-049
12. Ligda C, Gabriilidis G, Papadopoulos T, Georgoudis A. Estimation of genetic parameters for production traits of Chios sheep using a multitrait animal model. Livest Sci 2000; 66:217–21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00184-6
13. Hamann H, Horstick A, Wessels A, Distl O. Estimation of genetic parameters for test day milk production, somatic cell score and litter size at birth in East Friesian ewes. Livest Prod Sci 2004; 87:153–60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2003.09.015
17. Pellicer-Rubio MT, Leboeuf B, Bernelas D, et al. High fertility using artificial insemination during deep anoestrus after induction and synchronization of ovulatory activity by the “male effect” in lactating goats subjected to treatment with artificial long days and progestagens. Anim Reprod Sci 2008; 109:172–88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.11.026
18. Pelletier J, Chemineau P, Delgadillo JA. Seasonality of sexual activity and its photoperiodic control in the adult ram and he-goat. In : Proceedings of 11th International Congress Animal Reproduction Artificial Insemination; 1988 Jun 25–30; Dublin, Ireland. 5:p. 214–9.
19. Delgadillo JA, Leboeuf B, Chemineau P. Decrease in the seasonality of sexual behavior and sperm production in bucks by exposure to short photoperiodic cycles. Theriogenology 1991; 36:755–70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90341-A
21. Leboeuf B, Furstoss V, Guillouet P, Boue P. Production of artificial insemination doses from Alpine and Saanen bucks under various photoperiodic cycles. S Afr J Anim Sci 2004; 34:230–2.
22. Pellicer-Rubio MT, Leboeuf B, Bernelas D, et al. Highly synchronous and fertile reproductive activity induced by the male effect during deep anoestrus in lactating goats subjected to treatment with artificially long days followed by a natural photoperiod. Anim Reprod Sci 2007; 98:241–58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.03.002
25. Zaja IZ, Vince S, Milinkovic-Tur S, et al. Exogenous melatonin influences distribution of French Alpine buck spermatozoa in morphometrically distinct subpopulatons during the non-breeding season. Anim Reprod Sci 2018; 192:154–63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.03.003
26. Zarazaga LA, Gatica MC, Hernandez H, Chemineau P, Delgadillo JA, Guzman JL. Photoperiod-treated bucks are equal to melatonin-treated bucks for inducing reproductive behavior and physiological functions via the “male effect” in Mediterranean goats. Anim Reprod Sci 2019; 202:58–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.01.008
27. Ivanov II, Iwanoff E. De la fecondation artificielle chez les mammiferes [artificial insemination of mammals]. Arch Sci Biol 1907; 12:377–511.
28. Whckersham GH. The milk goat dairy. 3rd editionWichita, KS, USA: Lassen printer; 1919. p. 25–8.
29. Dauzier L. Artificial insemination in the goatDalling T, editorEncyclopedia of veterinary medicine. Edinburgh, UK: W Green and Son; 1966. p. 269–71.
30. Leboeuf B, Guillouet P, Bonne JL, Forgerit Y, Magistrini M. Goat semen preserved at 4°C until 76 hours before artificial insemination: different attempts to maintain the fertility. S Afr J Anim Sci 2004; 34:233–5.
31. Corteel JM. Production, storage and artificial insemination of goat semen. In : Proceeding of the Symposium “Management of Reproduction in Sheep and Goats”; 1977, Jul 24–25; Madison, WI, USA. p. 41–57.
34. Giriboni J, Gokdal O, Eren V, Yarali E, Santiago-Moreno J, Ungerfeld R. Daily administration of a GnRH analogue enhances sperm quality in bucks during the non-breeding season. Anim Reprod Sci 2019; 200:43–50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.11.009
35. Wang W, Luo J, Sun S, et al. The effect of season on spermatozoa motility, plasma membrane and acrosome integrity in fresh and frozen-thawed semen from Xinong Saanen bucks. Reprod Domest Anim 2015; 50:23–8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12444
36. Johnson LA, Flook JP, Look MV. Flow cytometry of X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm for DNA using an improved preparation method and staining with Hoechst 33342. Gamete Res 1987; 17:203–12.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120170303
37. Johnson LA, Seidel GE. Proc. current status of sexing mammalian sperm. Theriogenology 1999; 52:1267–484.
39. Johnson LA. Method to preselect the sex of offspring. US Government. 1992. US Pat. 5,135,759
42. Parrilla I, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Martinez EA. Flow cytometry identification of x- and Y-chromosome-bearing goat spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim 2004; 39:58–60.
43. Gao QH, Luo J, Sheng HJ, et al. Flow cytometric sexing of X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm in dairy goats and effects of laparoscopic insemination with low dose frozen sex-sorted semen (in Chinese). China Herbivore Sci 2009; 2:16–8.
44. Wang W. Study on breeding techniques, XY sperm sorting, copy number variation of Y-linked ZNF280BY in dairy goat (In Chinese) [Ph. D dissertation]. Yangling, Shaanxi, China: Northwest A&F University; 2015. 45–54. 55–60.
45. Moore NW. Multiple ovulation and ovum transfer in the goat. Proc Aust Sot Anim Prod 1974; 10:246–9.
46. Menchaca A, Miller V, Salveraglio V, Rubianes E. Endocrine, luteal and follicular responses after the use of the Short-Term Protocol to synchronize ovulation in goats. Anim Reprod Sci 2007; 102:76–87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.10.001
50. Swelum AAA, Alowaimer AN, Abouheif MA. Use of fluorogestone acetate sponges or controlled internal drug release for estrus synchronization in ewes: effects of hormonal profiles and reproductive performance. Theriogenology 2015; 84:498–503.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.03.018
52. Lopez-Sebastian A, Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Carrizosa JA, et al. New estrus synchronization and artificial insemination protocol for goats based on male exposure, progesterone and cloprostenol during the non-breeding season. Theriogenology 2007; 68:1081–7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.08.003
54. Sun S, Liu SM, Luo J, et al. Effects of repeated to an estrus synchronization protocol on reproductive parameters in dairy goats. Can J Anim Sci 2019; Jun. 12[Epub].
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0183
55. Baril G, Leboeuf B, Saumande J. Synchronization of estrus in goats: the relationship between time of occurrence of estrus and fertility following artificial insemination. Theriogenology 1993; 40:621–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90414-Z
56. Martemucci G, D’Alessandro AG. Induction/synchronization of oestrus and ovulation in dairy goats with different short term treatments and fixed time intrauterine or exocervical insemination system. Anim Reprod Sci 2011; 126:187–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.05.011
57. Menchaca A, dos Santos-Neto PC, Cuadro F, Souza-Neves M, Crispo M. From reproductive technologies to genome editing in small ruminants: an embryo’s journey. In : Proceedings of the 10th International Ruminant Reproduction Symposium; Foz do Iguacu, PR, Brazil. 2018; p. 984–95.
59. Chang ZL, Fan XZ, Luo MJ, Wu ZY, Tan JH. Factors affecting superovulation and embryo transfer in Boer goats. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2006; 19:341–6.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.341
60. Cervantes MJ, Juarez ML, Mejia VO, Berruecos VJM, Vera AH, Valencia J. Use of fluorogestone acetate after breeding to reduce the effect of premature luteal regression in dairy goats when superovulation is induced with FSH. Anim Reprod Sci 2007; 97:47–54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.01.008
63. Tervit HR, Gold PG, Mckenzie RD. Development of an effective goat embryo transfer regime. Proc NZ Sot Anim Prod 1986; 46:233–6.
65. Armstrong DT, Pfitzner AP, Wames GM, Seamark RF. Superovulation treatments and embryo transfer in Angora goats. J Reprod Fertil 1983; 67:403–10.
66. Delcampo CH, Salas F, Gatica R, Delcampo MR. Different methods of superovulation using HAP extract in goats during breeding season. Theriogenology 1985; 23:186(Abstract)
67. Rosniha Y, Jainudeen MR, Nihayah M. Superovulation and egg recovery in goats in the tropics. Vet Rec 1992; 130:97–9.
68. Andriyanto A, Rahminiwati M, Boediono A, Manalu W. Optimum dose and time of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin injections in Kacang goats to increase endogenous secretion of estrogen and progesterone without superovulation response. Small Rumin Res 2017; 149:147–53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.02.005
69. Rowson LEA, Dowling DF. An apparatus for the extraction of fertilized eggs from the living cow. Vet Rec 1949; 61:191
72. Elsden RP. Embryo collection by surgical meansBetteridge K, editorEmbryo transfer farm animals. Monograph No. 16Ottawa, Canada: Agriculture Canada; 1977. p. 10–2.
77. Greyling J. Applied reproductive physiologySolaiman SG, editorGoat science and production. Ames, IA, USA: 2010. p. 150–1.
78. Sudano MJ, Paschoal DM, Maziero RRD, et al. Improving postcryopreservation survival capacity: an embryo-focused approach. Anim Reprod 2013; 10:160–7.
80. Morató R, Romaguera R, Izquierdo D, Paramio MT, Mogas T. Vitrification of
in vitro produced goat blastocysts: effects of oocyte donor age and development stage. Cryobiology 2011; 63:240–4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2011.09.002
81. Youngs CR. Cryopreservation of preimplantation embryos of cattle, sheep, and goats. J Vis Exp 2011; 54:e2764
https://doi.org/10.3791/2764
83. Warwick BL, Barry RO, Horlacher WR. Results of mating rams to Angora female goats. In : Proceedings of 27th Annual Meeting of American Society of Animal Production; 1934; p. 225–7.
84. Flores-Foxworth G, McBride BM, Kraemer DC, Nuti LC. A comparison between laparoscopic and transcervical embryo collection and transfer in goats. Theriogenology 1992; 37:213(abstract)
85. Moore NW, Eppleston J. Embryo transfer in the Angora goat. Aust J Agric Res 1979; 30:973–81.
86. Bilton RJ, Moore NW.
In vitro culture, storage and transfer of goat embryos. Aust J Biol Sci 1976; 29:125–9.
87. Brebion P, Baril G, Cognie Y, Vallet JC. Embryo transfer in sheep and goat. Ann Zoot 1992; 41:331–9.
89. Fonseca JF, Batista RITP, Souza-Fabjan JMG, Oliveira MEF, Brandao FZ, Viana JHM. Freezing goat embryos at different developmental stages and quality using ethylene glycol and a slow cooling rate. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2018; 70:1489–96.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10196
95. Li H, Zhao Y, Mao J, Guan D. Comparison of placental traits and histological structure among different litter size in Dazu Black goat (Capra Hircus). Reprod Domest Anim 2014; 49:80
96. Lai FN, Zhai HL, Cheng M, Ma JY, Cheng SF, Ge W. Whole-genome scanning for the litter size trait associated genes and SNPs under selection in dairy goat (
Capra hircus). Sci Rep 2016; 6:38096
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38096
98. Hanrahan JP, Gregan SM, Mulsant P, et al. Mutations in the genes for oocyte-derived growth factors GDF9 and BMP15 are associated with both increased ovulation rate and sterility in Cambridge and Belclare sheep (
Ovis aries). Biol Reprod 2004; 70:900–9.
https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.023093
99. Chinmoy M, Mangalika R, Mishra S, Sahoo S, Gangadhar N, Patra RC. Genetic polymorphism of prolific genes in goat-a brief review. Explor Anim Med Res 2017; 7:132–41.
103. Arredondo AJG, Gómez AG, Vázquez-Armijo JF, Ledezma-Torres RA, Bernal-Barragán H, Sánchez-Dávila F. Status and implementation of reproductive technologies in goats in emerging countries. Afr J Biotechnol 2015; 14:719–27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB2014.14300
105. Pendleton RJ, Youngs CR, Rorie RW, Pool SH, Memon MA, Godke RA. Follicle-stimulating-hormone versus pregnant mare serum gonadotropin for superovulation of dairy goats. Small Rumin Res 1992; 8:217–24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(92)90042-3
106. Drion PV, Furtoss V, Baril G, et al. Four years of induction/synchronization of estrus in dairy goats: effect on the evolution of eCG binding rate in relation with the parameters of reproduction. Reprod Nutr Dev 2001; 41:401–12.
107. Swanson WF, Roth TL, Graham K, Horohov DW, Godke RA. Kinetics of the humoral immune response to multiple treatments with exogenous gonadotropins and relation to ovarian responsiveness in domestic cats. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57:302–7.
110. Bavister BD, Dees C, Schultz RD. Refractoriness of rhesus monkeys to repeated ovarian stimulation by exogenous gonadotropins is caused by nonprecipitating antibodies. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol 1986; 11:11–6.
111. Remy B, Baril G, Vallet JC, et al. Are antibodies responsible for a decreased superovulatory response in goats which have been treated repeatedly with porcine follicle-stimulating hormone? Theriogenology 1991; 36:389–99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90467-R