Go to Top Go to Bottom
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci > Volume 33(1); 2020 > Article
Sharma, Nimje, Tomar, Dey, Mondal, and Kundu: Effect of different fat and protein levels in calf ration on performance of Sahiwal calves

Abstract

Objective

The current study was carried out to examine the response of different levels of fat and protein in calf starter on nutrient utilisation, nitrogen metabolism, weight gain, blood parameters, and immunity level in pre-ruminant calves.

Methods

Twenty four calves (5 days old) were divided into six groups in a 2×3 factorial design, with two levels of fat (10% and 14%) and three levels of protein (18%, 21%, and 24%). The calves were kept in individual pens for 120 days and fed with whole milk (1/10th of body weight) and calf starter ad-libitum. Daily dry matter intake was recorded; whereas body weight was taken on fortnightly basis to calculate average daily gain. During the growth trial blood samples were collected at 30 days interval to estimate blood glucose, albumin, total protein, total leucocyte count, total immunoglobulins and immunoglobulin G levels. A metabolic trial of seven days was carried out to find out the digestibility of different nutrients.

Results

The dry matter intake was reduced (p<0.05) with higher fat and protein levels whereas feed conversion efficiency was improved (p<0.05) with higher protein level. Different levels of fat and protein in calf ration did not affect average daily gain in calves. The dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein digestibility were significantly (p<0.01) higher with increased level of protein. The nitrogen retention was also significantly higher (p<0.05) at 24% protein level, similarly the total immunoglobulin was significantly (p<0.05) high in higher protein fed groups, showed better immunity.

Conclusion

The present finding suggested that 10% fat and 18% protein level of calf starter could be used in Sahiwal calves for optimum performance in terms of weight gain and immunity.

INTRODUCTION

Health and performance of claves is the main focus area in calf rearing programme at any dairy herd to maintain future stock. Applying a suitable feeding strategy can maximize daily weight gain and better health of calves. Weaning of calves on milk feeding reduces the concentrate feeding, slower rumen development which ultimately decreases the feed intake and growth in post weaning stage [1]. In the modern dairy industry feeding of early-weaned calves with milk replacer is an effective way to raise replacement cattle [2]. Consumption of dry feed in young calves is a priority to stimulate the reticulorumen development [3]. Dry feed consumption by calves leads to reduction in milk feeding period; hence decrease the cost of raising replacement stock. Pre-ruminants depend solely on dietary sources of protein until the functional rumen is developed. Use of milk or animal proteins in milk replacer or calf starter is costly; hence plant protein sources can be used in place of milk or animal protein sources. The plant protein and fat sources like soybean meal, ground corn, oats meal, full fat soybean etc. can be utilized as ingredients in calf concentrate mixture [4]. The calf starter should have 20% crude protein (CP) (dry matter [DM] basis; 18% as fed basis) as per [5]. A report said that calves fed with 22% CP in starter feed were more efficient for BW gain than calves fed 18% CP in starter [6]. Another study found that protein levels of starter feed did not significantly affect feed intake and performance of calves [7]. Lohakare et al [8] reported that live weight gain and feed intake of calves was not affected when calves fed with different levels of proteins (19.46, 16.22, and 24.815) in diets. Fat supplementation provides energy for growth of calves. Feeding of starter feed containing more than 7.3% fat DM or 20% has been reported to decrease DM intake and BW gain [9,10]. Increasing the fat content (11.2% DM basis) of starter feed leads to decrease in feed intake but improvement of growth rate in Holstein calves [11]. Under Indian conditions farmers raise calves on milk which increase the cost of production, hence calf starter made with low cost protein and fat sources may reduce the cost of production.
Scientific literature regarding the effects of fat and protein contents in calf starter on DM intake, growth performance, and health parameters in Sahiwal calves is limited while the breed is very popular among farmers in India. This study was conducted to compare the effects of feeding two different levels of fat with three different protein levels on feed consumption, BW gain, health and selected blood metabolites in Sahiwal calves.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Selection, rations and management of calves

Twenty four Sahiwal calves (5 days old) were selected and a feeding trial was conducted at Livestock research centre, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, India. The calves were divided into six groups (four calves in each group) having similar average BW (21.00 kg). Six different calf starters were prepared with two levels of fat (F1: 10% and F2: 14%) having three levels of protein (P1: 18%, P2: 21%, and P3: 24%). Calves were fed ad libitum with either of the six different calf starter i.e. F1P1, F1P2, F1P3, F2P1, F2P2, and F2P3. Calf starters were totally formulated from locally available vegetative sources and their ingredients proportion is presented in Table 1. Calves were housed in individual pens on concrete floor housing. Calves were fed with Colostrum (10% of BW) upto 5 day of age, and then from 6 to 90 days of age whole milk feeding (10% of BW) was done. Calf starter and green fodder were offered to calves ad libitum from 15th day of age and feeding schedule of calves is presented in Table 2.
The feeding trial was conducted for 120 days and calves fed twice a day in morning and evening at 9:00 am and 4:00 pm, respectively. The fresh and clean water was made available round the clock. Normal deworming and vaccination schedule was followed to maintain the health of calves as per institutional schedule. At the end of feeding trial, a seven days metabolic trial was carried out to work out nutrient digestibility and N balance.

Sample collection and chemical analysis

The DM intake was recorded daily for individual animal. The samples of feed offered and residue left were collected and pooled separately for individual animal. For biochemical parameters like glucose, total protein, albumin and globulin as well as total immunoglobulins and immunoglobulin G (IgG), blood sample collected from jugular vein and plasma separated by centrifuge machine at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. The plasma samples were stored at −20°C until the analysis.
Digestibility of nutrients was estimated by difference method. During metabolic trial the samples of feed offered, residue left, dung and urine were collected and analyzed as per procedure [12] for organic matter (OM), CP, and ether extract (EE). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was assayed without α-amylase [13].

Estimation of crude protein and total digestible nutrient requirement of Sahiwal calves

During the feeding trial period BW, average daily gain (ADG) and nutrient intake of Sahiwal calves were recorded and data were analysed at fortnightly interval. The fortnightly CP intake (g/kg0.75) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) intake (g/kg0.75) were regressed linearly from ADG (g/kg0.75) for the determination of CP and TDN requirements for maintenance and growth. Regression equations were developed and CP and TDN requirements for maintenance were obtained by putting the ADG value at zero.

Statistical analysis

The experiment was designed as a 2×3 factorial and data were analysed using the general linear model procedure of the Statistical Analysis System Institute [14]. To test the effects of protein and fat concentration, fixed effects in the model were protein concentration, fat concentration, and their interaction. The significant differences were considered at α≤0.05 and no significant at α>0.05.
The model of this experiment is as follows:
Yijk=μ+Pi+Fj+PFij+Eijk
Whereas Yijk was the feeding effect on calves, μ was the mean value, Pi was an effect of protein, Fj was the effect of fat, PFij was the interaction of protein and fat and Eijk is error value.

RESULTS

Blood plasma biochemical parameters in Sahiwal calves

The summary of blood plasma parameters during the growth trial is presented in Table 3. Albumin and IgG levels did not differ significantly among the groups. Blood plasma parameters did not vary significantly with change in fat levels of calf starter except total immunoglobulin levels. The glucose and total protein levels were increased significantly with higher levels of protein (24%) than other levels of protein (18% and 21%), whereas total leucocyte count was significantly (p<0.01) reduced with increased levels of the protein. Total immunoglobulin levels were increased significantly with increase in fat and protein levels of ration that means immunity of calves improved with feeding of higher levels of fat and protein.

Nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance in Sahiwal calves

The different nutrient digestibility coefficient among the groups is presented in Table 4. There was a significant change in nutrient digestibility coefficient among the groups at different levels of protein but not in different levels of fat. The digestibility of DM, OM, and CP were significantly reduced at 18% protein level than 21% and 24% protein level; whereas the digestibility of EE was significantly improved at 18% protein level. The digestibility coefficient of NDF and acid detergent fiber (ADF) did not differ significantly among groups.
The intake, outgo, absorption and retention of nitrogen (N) in Sahiwal calves are presented in Table 5. There was no significant effect of fat and protein content of ration on N intake, N voided in faeces and urine, total N outgo and N absorption. The N retention in calves was significantly increased with increased protein level (p<0.05). The absorbed N and retained N as the percentage of N intake were also high with higher levels of protein.

Nutrient intake and weight gain in Sahiwal calves

The data on DM, CP, metabolisable energy (ME), TDN intake as well as ADG and feed conversion efficiency (FCE) during growth trial is provided in Table 6. Fat and protein levels of calf starter affected the DM intake in calves significantly. The DM intake was higher in group fed with calf starter having 10% fat and 18% protein level. The CP, ME, and TDN intake did not differ significantly among the groups. There was no significant effect of different levels of protein and fat on ADG. The FCE was significantly higher at 24% level of protein but fat level did not have significant impact on it.

Requirement of crude protein for maintenance and growth of Sahiwal calves

To find out the CP requirement of Sahiwal calves for maintenance and growth the CP intake (g/kg0.75) was regressed linearly with ADG (g/kg0.75). The regression equation is presented below (Figure 1).
y=0.3983x+5.1986(R2=0.5869,p<0.01)
Where, y = CP intake (g/kg0.75) of Sahiwal calves and x = ADG (g/kg0.75).
From the developed equation, the requirement of CP for maintenance and growth is 5.20 g/kg0.75 and 0.40 g/g ADG/kg BW0.75/d, respectively.

Requirement of total digestible nutrient for maintenance and growth of Sahiwal calves

The TDN intake (g/kg0.75) was regressed linearly from ADG (g/kg0.75) (Figure 2). The regression equation developed is as follows:
y=1.0007x+28.844(R2=0.4973,p<0.01)
Where, y = TDN intake (g/kg0.75) of Sahiwal calves and x = ADG (g/kg0.75).
From the structured equation, the TDN requirement of the growing calves for maintenance and growth is 28.8 g/kg0.75 and 1.0 g/g ADG/ kg BW0.75/d.

DISCUSSION

Blood plasma biochemical parameters in Sahiwal calves

The plasma albumin and IgG concentration did not vary with different levels of fat and protein in the present feeding trial. Similar to the present finding Daneshvar et al [15] reported no change in blood albumin levels after feeding calf starter containing 20% and 24% CP in the Holstein calves. There was no significant change observed in albumin levels after feeding the calves with different CP (23%, 25%, and 27%) contained milk replacer [16]. In the present study, glucose concentration increased with higher protein levels, which agrees with previous findings [1719]. In contrary, Blome et al [20] found that glucose concentration was not changed significantly due to CP content in milk replacer. It was found that total protein levels increased following increased CP content in calf starter. Protein levels, when increased in calf starter, might have spared blood proteins from catabolism, thus temporarily increased blood protein levels. Similarly, glucose would also be spared and ultimately leads to increased immunoglobulin levels. Li et al [21] also found higher level of plasma total protein in claves fed with higher protein levels in milk replacer.

Nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance in Sahiwal calves

The digestibility of DM, OM, and CP in the present study improved with the increase in protein levels. This improvement in digestibility of DM, OM, and CP could be due to increase in quantity of better quality nutrients with increase in protein levels of calf starter. Chapman et al [22] reported that calves fed with milk replacer (26% CP, 18% fat) had greater nutrient digestibility for DM, OM and tended to be greater for CP digestibility than the control groups (20% CP, 20% fat). In contrary, feeding of calves with MR (27% CP and 17% fat) at pre-weaning stage leads to decreased OM digestibility of 11% at post-weaning stage [23]. The EE digestibility was higher in calves fed with lower protein level of ration in this experiment. The EE digestibility did not differ significantly between three groups of dairy calves fed with rations having low (18%), medium (22%) and high (26%) protein levels [21]. In the present study, NDF and ADF digestibility remain unaltered at different fat and protein levels of calf starter have similarity with earlier report of Mehra et al [24] who stated that NDF digestibility variation was non-significant as levels of energy and protein increased in experimental diets. The NDF and ADF did not differ significantly by dietary CP levels [25,26].
Nitrogen intake (NI), N voided through faeces, urine and total N outgo remained unchanged during experimental trial. Chapman et al [22] observed no differences in N intake in Holstein dairy calves fed with high protein milk replacer. The N absorption did not alter with various levels of fat and protein. In the present trial the N retained, N retained as percentage NI, retained N as percentage NI and retained N as the percentage of absorbed were significantly higher with increased protein level in calf ration. The similar kind of results was concluded by Blome et al [20].

Nutrient intake and weight gain in Sahiwal calves

In the present study calves were fed milk at the rate of 10% of their BW but experimental rations feds ad libitum. The DM intake was reduced with higher fat and protein levels of calf starter. The decrease in DM intake with increase of CP and fat levels in rations could be due to increase in energy density of calf starter which satisfied the energy requirements of calves. Previous researcher Quigley et al [19] compared the effect of fixed amount feeding of a milk replacer (20% CP and 20% fat) with variable amount of a milk replacer (28% CP and 17% fat) feeding on calf starter intake, suggested that additional feeding of milk replacer decrease calf starter intake of calves up to 32 days age. In another study, lesser starter feed intake was observed when calves were supplemented with fat through milk replacer [27]. Similarly, Hill et al [28] found that starter intake by calves was decreased as the fat percentage of milk replacer increased. Lopes et al [29] recorded no variation in DM intake of calves when the calves received supplement having different levels of protein (8%, 19%, 30%, and 41% of CP).
The CP and ME intakes did not vary significantly with different levels of fat and protein in the present experiment. Similar to this study, Hill et al [16] concluded that ME intake among groups did not differ when the different groups of calves were fed with milk replacer containing 17% fat with different levels of CP (23%, 25%, 27%, and 29%) in a 56 days trial. In another report, 27% CP containing milk replacers with 4 different concentrations of fat (14%, 17%, 20%, and 23%) were fed and CP intake did not change significantly [28].
In the present study, increasing CP and fat content of starter feed (on DM basis) up to 24% and 14% respectively did not have a positive impact on performance of dairy calves. The genetic potential in Sahiwal might not be high enough to support increased gain due to high nutrient supply. Akayezu et al [30] stated that gain in BW was similar in calves fed with starter feed containing 19% and 22% CP from 4 to 56 days of age but these gain in BW were more than groups fed with 15% and 17% CP starter feed. Previous studies [31,32] reported that increasing the protein content above 20% of starter DM did not improve the performance of calves. Similarly, other studies concluded that performance of calves remained same at different CP levels of the starter [15,33]. Similar to present finding Araujo et al [11] found that fat levels of starter feed did not influence the ADG in Holstein calves. The FCE was increased with higher protein levels of diet represents better utilisation of calf rations in the present experiments. The FCE of present study was comparable with earlier reports. Blome et al [20] and Hill et al [16] reported that efficiency of gain increased linearly as dietary CP increased in milk replacers. Brown et al [34] also noted higher gain: feed ratio in calves fed with high protein diets.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that increasing the protein and fat content of calf starter had no effects on calf performance and health. It can be concluded that 10% fat and 18% protein levels in starter feed on DM basis is sufficient for optimum growth performance of Sahiwal calves. Further studies are required to observe the effect of increasing CP and fat levels in calf starter on rumen development in Sahiwal calves.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Authors are highly thankful to Director, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, Head of Animal Nutrition Division and Cattle Yard In charge for providing the facilities for the research work.

Figure 1
Relationship of CP intake (g/kg BW0.75) with ADG (g/kg BW0.75) of Sahiwal calves. CP, crude protein; BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain.
ajas-18-0604f1.gif
Figure 2
Relationship of TDN intake (g/kg BW0.75) with ADG (g/kg BW0.75) of Sahiwal calves. TDN, total digestible nutrient; BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain.
ajas-18-0604f2.gif
Table 1
Ingredient (%) composition of the calf rations used during trial
Ingredients (%) 10%1) 14%1)


18%2) 21%2) 24%2) 18%2) 21%2) 24%2)
Maize grain 35 24 30 35 32 30
DORB 10.1 18 8.7 10.1 7.3 2.5
Wheat bran 20 15 10 20 8.3 7.2
GNC 12 9 20 12 7.5 16
Full fat soya 13 25 23.3 13 32.4 32.5
Molasses 5 5 5 5 5 5
Prilled fat 1.9 1 0 1.9 4.5 3.8
Mineral mixture 2 2 2 2 2 2
Salt 1 1 1 1 1 1

DORB, deoiled rice bran; GNC, groundnut cake.

1) Fat levels.

2) Protein levels.

Table 2
Feeding schedule of calves
Age group Whole milk Calf ration Green fodder offered
0–5 days 1/10th of body wt. (Colostrum) Nil Nil
6–30 days 1/10th body wt. (Max. 3 L) Introduced gradually after 15 d of age Offered (negligible consumption)
1–2 month 1/10th body wt. (Max. 3 L) 200–300 g Ad libitum
2–3 month Max. 3 L 300–400 g Ad libitum
3–4 month Nil 400–600 g Ad libitum
Table 3
Effect of different levels of fat and protein on blood plasma parameters in Sahiwal calves
Parameters 10%1) 14%1) Effect



18%2) 21%2) 24%2) 18%2) 21%2) 24%2) Fat (F) Protein (P) F×P
Albumin (g/L) 19.95±2.57 13.30±1.29 14.01±4.00 11.41±0.64 15.23±1.71 11.75±1.34 NS NS 0.0404
Immunoglobulin G (mg/100 mL) 2,536.54±862.28 1,821.89±70.52 1,812.50±12.53 1,833.23±61.46 2,525.23±905.16 1,902.38±196.44 NS NS NS
Glucose (mg/dL) 90.33xy±1.91 85.51x±4.35 90.89y±1.78 86.47xy±0.06 84.28x±5.37 94.04y±3.12 NS 0.0462 NS
Total protein (g/L) 48.80x±0.61 51.13xy±0.07 51.22y±0.69 51.07x±2.42 50.66xy±0.90 53.98y±0.31 NS 0.0390 NS
Total leucocyte count (103/μL) 12.91y±0.44 12.47y±0.04 10.07x±0.13 11.26y±0.36 11.13y±0.30 11.46x±0.44 NS 0.0004 0.0002
Total immunoglobulins (mg/mL) 21.51Bxy±0.65 22.08By±0.44 22.19Bx±0.41 23.37Axy±0.74 24.47Ay±0.74 21.55Ax±0.46 0.0100 0.0391 0.0191

NS, non significant.

1) Fat levels.

2) Protein levels.

A,B Capital letters in the same row, differ at p<0.05 by least square means for fat levels effect.

x,y Letters in the same row, differ at p<0.05 by least square means for protein levels effect.

Table 4
Effect of different levels of fat and protein on nutrient digestibility (%) in Sahiwal calves
Parameters 10%1) 14%1) Effect



18%2) 21%2) 24%2) 18%2) 21%2) 24%2) Fat (F) Protein (P) F×P
Dry matter 57.78x±2.07 60.43y±3.02 70.92y±4.59 62.16x±1.22 64.83y±0.71 61.90y±2.57 NS 0.0054 NS
Organic matter 59.21x±1.92 61.32y±3.01 72.16y±4.46 63.03x±1.43 68.29y±2.03 62.54y±2.52 NS 0.0023 NS
Crude protein 47.93x±6.14 45.55y±1.58 63.90y±4.25 43.77x±2.75 51.78y±3.80 47.49y±2.53 NS 0.0034 0.0467
Ether extract 86.49x±1.79 80.79x±3.99 80.17y±2.97 77.76x±4.40 60.58x±4.97 54.34y±5.63 NS 0.0000 NS
Neutral detergent fiber 49.72±3.22 52.84±2.42 63.93±7.10 54.45±2.45 54.60±1.48 57.18±5.42 NS NS NS
Acid detergent fiber 42.46±1.72 47.77±5.07 58.72±6.75 49.47±3.04 51.83±0.49 44.90±4.86 NS NS NS
Non-fiber carbohydrate 80.34y±3.44 70.16x±2.34 89.42x±1.20 90.13y±1.49 89.09x±3.97 91.23x±4.32 NS 0.0001 NS

NS, nonsignificant.

1) Fat levels.

2) Protein levels.

x,y Letters in the same row, differ at p<0.05 by least square means for protein levels effect.

Table 5
Effect of different levels of fat and protein on nitrogen balance in Sahiwal calves
Parameters 10%1) 14%1) Effect



18%2) 21%2) 24%2) 18%2) 21%2) 24%2) Fat (F) Protein (P) F×P
N intake (g/d) 28.06±2.21 37.36±8.13 42.23±6.66 30.29±1.64 29.67±0.12 34.26±3.56 NS NS 0.0396
N voided in faeces (g/d) 15.24±0.78 18.82±2.43 15.37±3.29 14.66±1.81 16.69±0.88 17.87±1.05 NS NS NS
N voided in urine (g/d) 2.98±0.55 4.22±0.69 6.55±1.55 3.93±0.82 4.88±0.01 6.43±1.71 NS NS NS
Total N outgo (g/d) 18.22±1.31 23.03±3.10 21.92±2.75 18.59±2.61 21.57±0.87 24.30±2.57 NS NS NS
Absorbed nitrogen (g/d) 12.83±1.45 18.55±5.76 26.87±4.00 15.64±0.93 12.98±0.77 16.39±2.53 NS NS 0.0127
N retained (g/d) 9.85xy±0.91 14.33x±5.07 20.31y±3.91 11.71xy±1.36 8.10x±0.76 9.96y±1.46 NS 0.0303 0.0320
Absorbed N as % of N intake 45.55y±1.58 47.93x±6.14 63.89y±4.25 51.78y±3.80 43.78x±2.75 47.49y±2.53 NS 0.0034 0.0467
Retained N as % of N intake 35.03y±0.49 36.42x±6.88 47.77z±1.58 38.95y±5.61 27.32x±2.67 29.05z±2.63 NS 0.0020 NS

NS, nonsignificant.

1) Fat levels.

2) Protein levels.

x,y Letters in the same row, differ at p<0.05 by least square means for protein levels effect.

Table 6
Effect of different levels of fat and protein on nutrient intake, average daily gain and feed conversion efficiency in Sahiwal calves
Parameters 10%1) 14%1) Effect



18%2) 21%2) 24%2) 18%2) 21%2) 24%2) Fat (F) Protein (P) F×P
DMI (g/100 kg BW) 2,405.49Ay±230.46 1,954.93Ax±182.7 1,910.79Ax±135.75 1,901.73By±168.32 1,955.33Bx±160.01 1,751.13Bx±215.65 0.0323 0.0257 NS
CPI (g/100 kg BW) 526.87±42.18 445.39±17.27 452.49±12.74 447.59±42.05 454.06±25.33 412.72±41.10 NS NS NS
ME intake (MJ/100 kg BW) 34.89±2.32 30.33±1.26 29.49±0.48 29.95±2.04 30.67±1.71 27.74±2.53 NS NS NS
TDN intake (g/100 kg BW) 2,031.21±287.86 1,715.75±81.41 1,607.56±45.21 1,683.05±116.18 1,721.39±96.21 1,588.24±95.08 NS NS NS
ADG (g/100 kg BW) 168.89±16.07 204.20±46.43 243.65±9.89 236.53±19.97 247.26±48.58 281.98±82.32 NS NS NS
FCE 0.26x±0.02 0.32y±0.04 0.41y±0.01 0.40x±0.05 0.42y±0.04 0.44y±0.11 NS 0.0151 NS

NS, nonsignificant; BW, body weight; CPI, crude protein intake; ME, metabolisable energy; TDN, total digestible nutrient; ADG, average daily gain; FCE, feed conversion efficiency.

1) Fat levels.

2) Protein levels.

A,B Capital letters in the same row, differ at p<0.05 by least square means for fat levels effect.

x,y Letters in the same row, differ at p<0.05 by least square means for protein levels effect.

REFERENCES

1. Sweeney BC, Rushen J, Weary DM, De Passillé AM. Duration of weaning, starter intake, and weight gain of dairy calves fed large amounts of milk. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93:148–52. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2427
crossref pmid
2. Heinrichs AJ. Raising dairy replacements to meet the needs of the 21st century. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76:3179–87.
crossref pmid
3. Warner RG, Flatt WP, Loosli JK. Ruminant nutrition, dietary factors influencing development of ruminant stomach. J Agric Food Chem 1956; 4:788–92. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60067a003
crossref
4. Montoro C, Bach A. Voluntary selection of starter feed ingredients offered separately to nursing calves. Livest Sci 2012; 149:62–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.06.026
crossref
5. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed.Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2001.

6. Drackley JK, Bartlett KS, Blome RM. Protein content of milk replacers and calf starters for replacement calves [internet]. Urbana and Champaign, IL, USA: University of Illinois Extension; [cited 2002, Feb 22]. Available from: http://livestocktrail.illinois.edu/dairynet/paperDisplay.cfm?ContentID=339

7. Ozkaya S, Toker MT. Effect of amount of milk fed, weaning age and starter protein level on growth performance in Holstein calves. Archiv Anim Breed 2012; 55:234–44. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-55-234-2012
crossref pdf
8. Lohakare JD, Pattanaik AK, Khan SA. Effect of dietary protein levels on the performance, nutrient balances, metabolic profile and thyroid hormones of crossbred calves. Asia-Australas J Anim Sci 2006; 19:1588–96. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1588
crossref pdf
9. Kuehn CS, Otterby DE, Linn JG, et al. The effect of dietary energy concentration on calf performance. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77:2621–9.
crossref pmid
10. Miller WJ, Carmon JL, Dalton HL. Influence of high levels of plant and animal fats in calf starters on growth, feed consumption, and palatability. J Dairy Sci 1959; 42:153–8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(59)90538-7
crossref
11. Araujo G, Terré M, Bach A. Interaction between milk allowance and fat content of the starter feed on performance of Holstein calves. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97:6511–8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8281
crossref pmid
12. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed.Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arilington, VA, USA: AOAC; 2005.

13. Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74:3583–97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
crossref pmid
14. Institute SAS Inc. SAS user’s guide: statistics Version 92. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc; 2003.

15. Daneshvar D, Khorvash M, Ghasemi E, Mahdavi AH. Combination effects of milk feeding methods and starter crude protein concentration: evaluation on performance and health of Holstein male calves. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2017; 223:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.10.025
crossref
16. Hill TM, Bateman H, Aldrich JM, Schlotterbeck RL. Optimizing nutrient ratios in milk replacers for calves less than five weeks of age. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92:3281–91. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1750
crossref pmid
17. Ballou MA. Immune responses of Holstein and Jersey calves during the preweaning and immediate postweaned periods when fed varying planes of milk replacer. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95:7319–30. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5970
crossref pmid
18. Foote MR, Nonnecke BJ, Beitz DC, Waters WR. High growth rate fails to enhance adaptive immune responses of neonatal calves and is associated with reduced lymphocyte viability. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:404–17. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)72641-3
crossref pmid
19. Quigley JD, Wolfe TA, Elsasser TH. Effects of additional milk replacer feeding on calf health, growth, and selected blood metabolites in calves. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89:207–16. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72085-9
crossref pmid
20. Blome RM, Drackley JK, McKeith FK, Hutjens MF, McCoy GC. Growth, nutrient utilization, and body composition of dairy calves fed milk replacers containing different amounts of protein. J Anim Sci 2003; 81:1641–55. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8161641x
crossref pmid pdf
21. Li H, Diao QY, Zhang NF, Fan ZY. Growth, nutrient utilization and amino acid digestibility of dairy calves fed milk replacers containing different amounts of protein in the preruminant period. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2008; 21:1151–8. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70562
crossref pdf
22. Chapman CE, Hill TM, Elder DR, Erickson PS. Nitrogen utilization, preweaning nutrient digestibility, and growth effects of Holstein dairy calves fed 2 amounts of a moderately high protein or conventional milk replacer. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100:279–92. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11886
crossref pmid
23. Chapman CE, Erickson PS, Quigley JD, et al. Effect of milk replacer program on calf performance and digestion of nutrients with age of the dairy calf. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99:2740–7. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10372
crossref pmid
24. Mehra UR, Dass RS, Verma AK, Sahu DS. Effect of feeding urea and acetic acid treated wheat straw on the digestibility of nutrients in adult male Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2001; 14:1690–5. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.1690
crossref pdf
25. Tatsapong P, Peangkoum P, Pimpa O, Hare MD. Effects of dietary protein on nitrogen metabolism and protein requirements for maintenance of growing Thai swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) calves. J Anim Vet Adv 2010; 9:1216–22. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.1216.1222
crossref
26. Chantiratikul A, Chumpawadee S, Kanchanamayoon W, Chantiratikul P. Effect of dietary protein on nutrient digestibility and nitrogen metabolism in Thai-Indigenous heifers. J Anim Vet Adv 2009; 8:297–300.

27. Litherland NB, Da Silva DN, LaBerge RJ, Schefers J, Kertz A. Supplemental fat for dairy calves during mild cold stress. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97:2980–9. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6942
crossref pmid
28. Hill TM, Bateman HG, Aldrich JM, Schlotterbeck RL. Effects of fat concentration of a high-protein milk replacer on calf performance. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92:5147–53. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2245
crossref pmid
29. Lopes SA, Paulino MF, Detmann E, et al. Supplementation of suckling beef calves with different levels of crude protein on tropical pasture. Trop Anim Health Prod 2014; 46:379–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0500-6
crossref pmid pdf
30. Akayezu JM, Linn JG, Otterby DE, Hansen WP, Johnson DG. Evaluation of calf starters containing different amounts of crude protein for growth of Holstein calves. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77:1882–9. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77130-7
crossref pmid
31. Hill TM, Bateman HG, Aldrich JM, Schlotterbeck RL. Effects of the feeding rate of high protein calf milk replacers. Prof Anim Sci 2007; 23:649–55. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31036-6
crossref
32. Stamey JA, Janovick NA, Kertz AF, Drackley JK. Influence of starter protein content on growth of dairy calves in an enhanced early nutrition program. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95:3327–36. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5107
crossref pmid
33. Labussiere E, Dubois S, Van Milgen J, Bertrand G, Noblet J. Effects of dietary crude protein on protein and fat deposition in milk-fed veal calves. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91:4741–54. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1203
crossref pmid
34. Brown EG, VandeHaar MJ, Daniels KM, et al. Effect of increasing energy and protein intake on body growth and carcass composition of heifer calves. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88:585–94. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72722-3
crossref pmid


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : jongkha@hotmail.com               

Copyright © 2020 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. All rights reserved.

Close layer
prev next