Fermentation characteristics, chemical composition and microbial community of tropical forage silage under different temperatures

Article information

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci.. 2019;32(5):665-674
Publication date (electronic) : 2018 July 26
doi : https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0085
1College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2Beijing Sure Academy of Biosciences, Beijing 100085, China
*Corresponding Author: Fuyu Yang, Tel: +86-010-62733052, Fax: +86-010-62734252, E-mail: yfuyu@126.com
Received 2018 January 24; Revised 2018 April 2; Accepted 2018 June 26.

Abstract

Objective

In tropical regions, as in temperate regions where seasonality of forage production occurs, well-preserved forage is necessary for animal production during periods of forage shortage. However, the unique climate conditions (hot and humid) and forage characteristics (high moisture content and low soluble carbohydrate) in the tropics make forage preservation more difficult. The current study used natural ensiling of tropical forage as a model to evaluate silage characteristics under different temperatures (28°C and 40°C).

Methods

Four tropical forages (king grass, paspalum, white popinac, and stylo) were ensiled under different temperatures (28°C and 40°C). After ensiling for 30 and 60 days, samples were collected to examine the fermentation quality, chemical composition and microbial community.

Results

High concentrations of acetic acid (ranging from 7.8 to 38.5 g/kg dry matter [DM]) were detected in silages of king grass, paspalum and stylo with relatively low DM (ranging from 23.9% to 30.8% fresh material [FM]) content, acetic acid production was promoted with increased temperature and prolonged ensiling. Small concentrations of organic acid (ranging from 0.3 to 3.1 g/kg DM) were detected in silage of white popinac with high DM content (50.8% FM). The microbial diversity analysis indicated that Cyanobacteria originally dominated the bacterial community for these four tropical forages and was replaced by Lactobacillus and Enterobacter after ensiling.

Conclusion

The results suggested that forage silages under tropical climate conditions showed enhanced acetate fermentation, while high DM materials showed limited fermentation. Lactobacillus and Enterobacter were the most probable genera responsible for tropical silage fermentation.

INTRODUCTION

With the rapid economic development in tropical areas, the demand for animal products is increasing greatly. It is well known that tropical forage is sufficient or even available in excess for animal feed during the fast growing season, whereas there can be limited supply in winter when the forage grows slowly. This has become the main factor limiting the improvement of animal product quantity and quality in these regions. Therefore, a suitable storage technique for green forage is necessary to cover these shortages in the tropics [1].

Ensiling has been regarded as a common way for preserving green forage in temperate areas, because of its long shelf life, good palatability and high nutrition [2]. However, the application of ensiling techniques in tropical areas has been limited when compared with that in temperate regions. Previous studies reported that the fermentation pattern of tropical forage silages might differ from that of temperate silages [3]. The main difference is that lactic acid is the major fermentation product for temperate silages, whereas acetic acid is often regarded as the primary fermentation product in tropical silages [4]. However, little information is available on the microbial community associated with the promotion of acetic acid fermentation. Characterizing the microbial population and activity might help to understand the unique fermentation conditions and improve the silage quality in the tropics.

Temperature is one of the crucial factors impacting silage quality. Different temperature conditions can affect the activity of microorganisms in silages, which can also influence the fermentation process [5]. In general, the ensiling temperature is around 28°C in temperate areas, whereas the temperature can reach up to around 40°C in tropical regions. The impacts of high temperature (>37°C) have been studied on various temperate forage silages such as alfalfa, corn and other crops. Some studies have found that hot conditions (around 40°C) lowered lactic acid production, whereas acetic acid production was enhanced [4,6,7]. However, tropical silage fermentation under high temperature has rarely been studied, despite the fact that high temperature might be an important environmental factor in the tropics.

Hainan is the southernmost province of China with the typical tropical climate of warm to hot and moist throughout the year. King grass (Pennisetum purpureum×P. americana), paspalum (Paspalum plicatulum), white popinac (Leucaena leucocephala), and stylo (Stylosanthes guianensis) are widely cultivated forage species with high yield and good palatability for livestock in this region. Increasing efforts are devoted to improving their preservation for animal production maintenance. This study was designed to evaluate the natural fermentation characteristics of these tropical forage silages under different temperatures (28°C and 40°C).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Silage preparation

The experiment was conducted at the experimental base of the Tropical Genetic Resource Institute of the Chinese Academy of Tropical Agriculture Science, Dan Zhou, Hainan, China (109°30′E, 19°30′N). Four forages (king grass [Pennisetum purpureum×P. americana cv. Reyan No.4], paspalum [Paspalum plicatulum cv. Reyan No.11], white popinac [Leucaena leucocephala cv. Reyan No.1] and stylo [Stylosanthes guianensis cv. Reyan No.2]) were harvested at the vegetative stage in July, 2016.

The harvested materials were wilted overnight and chopped by a forage cutter set to about 2 cm in length. Silages were prepared using a small-scale system: 200 g of each type of forage material were packed into plastic bags (N-9, Asahi Kasei Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the air was removed using a vacuum sealer. The silos were stored at low temperature (28°C in incubator) and high temperature (40°C in incubator) for 30 and 60 days. Each treatment of the four forages was conducted in triplicate.

Microbial enumeration, organic acid and chemical composition analysis

Silage samples (10 g) were blended with 90 mL of sterilized water and serially diluted from 10−1 to 10−5 in sterilized water. Bacterial counts were estimated for lactic acid bacteria (LAB) using de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar (incubated anaerobically). Yeasts and molds were enumerated on spread plates of potato dextrose agar. The plate cultures were incubated at 30°C for 48 h (media were obtained from Beijing Aoboxing Bio-tech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Microbial counts were converted to log10 and presented on a fresh material (FM) basis.

Silage pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) and organic acid contents were determined from water extracts. The pH was measured using a glass electrode pH meter (PHS-3C, INESA Scientific Instrument, Shanghai, China). The NH3-N content was analyzed using the method described by Broderick and Kang [8]. Lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (LC20A, Shimadzu, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

Dry matter (DM) content was determined by drying the material in an oven at 65°C for 48 h. Crude protein (CP) was analyzed according to the guidelines provided by Latimer [9]. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were determined using the methods described by Van Soest et al [10]. The water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC) content was determined using the anthrone method [11].

Analysis of bacterial diversity through high-throughput sequencing of metagenomic DNA

The four pre-ensiled forages and silage samples were added to a 20×volume of sterilized phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), and DNA extraction was performed as described by Ni et al [12]. The V3–V4 region of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (95°C for 2 min followed by 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min) using the primers 338F (ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG) and 806R (GGACTACH VGGGTWTCTAAT). To minimize PCR bias, triplicate PCR reactions were conducted for each sample, and mixtures of the three PCR products were used for measuring the DNA concentration and sequencing [12,13]. The DNA samples were paired-end sequenced (2×250) on an Illumina MiSeq platform at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). For quality-control purposes, any sequences that contained mismatches and ambiguous reads in the primers were removed.

Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered with a similarity cutoff of 97% using UPARSE (version 7.1, http://drive5.com/uparse/), and chimeric sequences were identified and removed using UCHIME. The taxonomy of each 16S rRNA gene sequence was analyzed using the ribosomal database project (RDP) Classifier (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/) against the SILVA (SSU115) 16S rRNA database with a confidence threshold of 70%. The alpha-diversities of the samples, mainly the Shannon index, Chao richness estimator, and Good’s coverage, were calculated using Mothur (version 1.30.1, http://www.mothur.org/wiki/Classify.seqs). Taxonomic classification at the genus level was performed using the RDP algorithm to classify the representative sequences of each OTU [14].

Statistical analysis

Data on fermentation characteristics, chemical composition and microbial community composition after ensiling were analyzed with a completely randomized design with a 2×2 (ensiling days [D]×storage temperature [T]) factorial treatment structure. The means were then compared for significance using the Duncan’s multiple range method. All statistical analysis was performed using the general linear model procedure in SAS 9.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 2002). Significance was declared at p<0.05 unless otherwise noted.

RESULTS

Characteristics of four tropical forages before ensiling

The chemical composition and microbial community composition of the four tropical forages prior to ensiling are shown in Table 1. White popinac had the highest DM content (50.8% FM), followed by stylo (30.8% FM), paspalum (25.9% FM) and king grass (23.9% FM). The CP content ranged from 66.8 to 264 g/kg DM; the highest and lowest values were found in white popinac and paspalum, respectively. The NDF and ADF contents ranged from 456 to 716 and from 255 to 455 g/kg DM, respectively. The WSC contents were not >30.0 g/kg DM. Overall, the LAB population were around 5.0 log colony forming units (cfu)/g FM and the molds and yeasts were around 3.0 log cfu/g FM.

Chemical and microbial composition of four tropical forages

Fermentation characteristics of four tropical forage silages

Fermentation characteristics of the four tropical silages are shown in Table 2. Ensiling days and storage temperature showed significant effects on pH and lactic acid content for king grass and stylo silages (p<0.001). The pH decreased gradually with increased temperature and prolonged ensiling for these two forages, while the lactic acid content showed the opposite trend. Similar results were found for paspalum and white popinac, although the effects were not all significant. When storage was prolonged up to 60 days, the pH values of the four tropical silages at 40°C, were the lowest, and the lactic acid content was the highest for each forage species. Acetic acid content increased gradually over the ensilage for all four tropical silages (p<0.001); the highest acetic acid content was obtained for king grass silage (38.5 g/kg DM) after 60 days ensiling at 40°C. The highest content of propionic acid (16.5 g/kg DM) and butyric acid (4.7 g/kg DM) was observed after 60 days at 40°C in paspalum and king grass silage, respectively. For white popinac silage, lactic acid content ranged from 1.6 to 3.1 g/kg DM, while the other three organic acid contents were all very low (<1.0 g/kg DM). NH3-N content increased with prolonged ensiling time (p<0.001) and ranged from 10.1 to 17.5 g/kg DM for king grass silages. There was no significant effect of storage temperature on NH3-N for these tropical silages. Similar to the results of organic acid contents, white popinac silage had the lowest NH3-N content (<1.0% total nitrogen).

Fermentation characteristics of four tropical forage silages during ensiling

Chemical composition of four tropical forage silages

Chemical composition of the silages is shown in Table 3. DM content decreased with prolonged ensiling time for these four tropical silages (p<0.001), whereas there were no significant differences in NDF, ADF, and CP content during the ensiling. WSC content decreased after 30 days ensiling. The lowest WSC contents were found at 40°C after 60 days of ensiling for all silages.

Chemical composition of four tropical forage silages during ensiling

Microbial population of four tropical forage silages

The interaction of ensiling days and storage temperature had significant effects on the population of LAB by enumeration using culture-based approaches (p<0.001; Table 4). After 30 days ensiling, silages stored at 40°C had higher numbers of LAB than those at 28°C (p<0.05). However, the opposite phenomenon was observed after 60 days ensiling, the numbers of LAB of the four forage silages decreased at 40°C, whereas they generally increased at 28°C. A small number of molds (≤3.0 log cfu/g FM) were detected only in white popinac silage at low temperature after 30 days ensiling. Yeast was not detected in all silages.

Microbial composition of four tropical forage silages during ensiling

Bacterial community of four tropical forage silages examined by high-throughput sequencing of metagenomic DNA

High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons was conducted to comprehensively characterize bacterial communities in four tropical forage silages. A total of 766,028 bacteria sequences (approximately 38,000 sequences per sample) were obtained. After bioinformatics analysis, a total of 552,860 sequences were classified. As listed in Table 5, these sequences were clustered into a total of 5,502 OTUs at a 3% dissimilarity level. The OTUs ranged from 124 to 565 for each sample, except for fresh paspalum material with the maximum value of 1,055. The Chao index, which was utilized to estimate the number of OTUs, showed a similar trend to OTUs. The coverage values in all silages ranged from 0.978 to 0.999, suggesting that most of the bacterial communities were detected. The highest value of the Shannon index (the diversity index of the microbial communities) was obtained for white popinac (4.95) at high temperature after ensiling for 60 days.

Diversity statistics of bacterial community and abundances of the most relatively abundant bacterial genera during ensilage process

The dynamic variance of bacterial community structure of four tropical forage silages was demonstrated by principal component analysis (PCA; Figure 1), where principal components 1 (PC1) and 2 (PC2) explained 70.26% and 16.48% of the total variance, respectively. The samples clustered into two groups: the four fresh tropical forages were in one group, while the silage samples were in the other.

Figure 1

Principal component analysis of the four tropical forage samples on genus level. K, king grass; P, paspalum; W, white popinac; S, stylo; L, low temperature (28°C); H, high temperature (40°C); 30, 30 days; 60, 60 days.

Differences in bacterial community among the pre-ensiled forages and silages at the genus level with the threshold at >2.0% of the total, are shown in Figure 2. Cyanobacteria accounted for 71.7%, 38.9%, 93.2%, and 71.4% in pre-ensiled king grass, paspalum, white popinac and stylo, respectively; its proportion decreased to <1% after 30 days ensiling and increased to 33.4% after 60 days ensiling at 40°C in king grass silages. The opposite trend was found in white popinac, where the proportion of Cyanobacteria decreased gradually with prolonged ensiling and increased temperature; the proportion of Cyanobacteria was only 0.4% after 60 days ensiling at 40°C. For paspalum and stylo, Cyanobacteria decreased to marginal levels after ensiling. Lactobacillus and Enterobacter became the two predominant genera after ensiling, accounting for 11.6% and 33.7% of the total sequences, respectively. These two high abundance genera corresponded to the bacterial genus analysis in Table 5. The proportion of Lactobacillus ranged from 8.2% to 25.8% in king grass, 0.2% to 7.4% in paspalum, 14.2% to 44.4% in white popinac, and 2.9% to 7.2% in stylo; while the proportion of Enterobacter ranged from 9.2% to 60.7% in king grass, 27.5% to 64.4% in paspalum, 0.9% to 26.7% in white popinac and 63.3% to 74.6% in stylo. Many other LAB genera, i.e., Enterococcus, Pediococcus, Weissella, and Lactococcus, were also detected after ensiling (Figure 2). The proportions of Enterococcus, Weissella, and Lactococcus ranged from 1.0% to 21.7%, <0.1% to 18.3%, <0.1% to 12.6%, respectively, for these four silages. Pediococcus (1.8% to 19.6%) was mainly detected at 40°C after 30 days ensiling. Bifidobacterium was also detected in these silage samples, mainly in king grass silages, and it increased gradually with increased temperature and prolonged ensiling (0.4% to 26.5%).

Figure 2

Genus-level microbiota analysis of the four tropical forages during ensiling. K, king grass; P, paspalum; W, white popinac; S, stylo; L, low temperature (28°C); H, high temperature (40°C); 30, 30 days; 60, 60 days.

DISCUSSION

Although ensiling technique is quite mature and has been widely applied in temperate regions, it is not common in tropical areas, despite the high yield of tropical forages. Feeding silage is expected to improve the productivity of livestock in the tropics and increasing attempts are being carried out to develop a suitable ensilage process [15,16]. The differences in the internal factors and external environmental characteristics between tropical and temperate forages might result in distinct fermentation properties.

It is well known that pH and organic acid are important indicators reflecting microbial activity and silage fermentation. Previous studies reported that high temperatures (around 40°C) were unfavorable for LAB fermentation, leading to decreased organic acid concentration, increased pH and having a detrimental effect on the fermentation process for many temperate forage silages (i.e., alfalfa, wheat, corn) [5,6]. However, this was inconsistent with our finding on tropical silages. In the present study, pH was rapidly reduced for the silages at 40°C, especially for stylo, in which the pH decreased to 4.9 even with storage for only 30 days. When it was ensiled at 28°C, even after 60 days, the pH remained high at pH 5.2, which implied that fermentation for the tropical silage was more vigorous at 40°C than at 28°C.

It is well documented that lactate type fermentation is dominant in temperate forage silages. In the present study, acetic acid content was much higher than lactic acid in king grass, paspalum and stylo silages, and its content increased as the temperature increased and the ensiling was prolonged. Similar results were found in other studies that acetic acid was considered as the main acid responsible for preservation in tropical grass silages [1,3,4]. Nishino et al [17] reported that even if lactic acid production was observed when ensiling was initiated, prolonged ensiling was found to decrease the lactic acid level and increase the acetic acid level for tropical grass silages. This phenomenon suggested that different from the temperate forage silages, acetate type fermentation occurred in tropical silages and implied that the environmental conditions encountered in the tropics might affect the physiology and metabolism of the microorganisms involved in the silage fermentation.

The acetic acid production was higher at high storage temperature (40°C) when compared with that at low temperature (28°C); a similar trend was also demonstrated with guinea grass, maize and total mixed ration silages in temperate areas [7,18,19]. The efficient acetate fermentation at high temperature might be attributed to the thermodynamic implication, that high temperature facilitated the metabolism of acetic acid producing bacteria, like Enterobacter and hetero-fermentative LAB [7]. This might also account for the lower pH in silages of 40°C than in those of 28°C in the present study.

NH3-N was measured to follow potential protein breakdown that might have resulted from elevated temperature and prolonged ensiling time. Previous studies on temperate forages reported that high temperatures (around 40°C) usually led to detrimental effects on the fermentation process by facilitating the growth of proteolytic bacteria, and enhancing proteolysis, thereby exacerbating the NH3-N production. Our results were inconsistent with this trend, as high temperature exhibited no significant effects on NH3-N in the present study. A possible explanation for such differences might be that the high acetic acid content at high temperature inhibited some proteolytic microorganisms [20].

Microorganisms play an important role in silage fermentation; however, investigations on the microflora associated with tropical fermentation are rare. In this study, the microbial diversity of the four tropical forage silages was systematically analyzed by both culture-based and culture independent methods. The results indicated that numbers of yeasts and molds decreased during the ensiling process, especially for the silages stored at high temperature, where yeasts and molds were not detected after ensiling. The LAB counts were higher in silages stored at 40°C than at 28°C after 30 days ensiling, and this was consistent with the results of the high-throughput sequencing of metagenomic DNA, Lactobacillus was present at higher proportions when stored at 40°C than 28°C after 30 days ensiling in these four silages, which could account for the increases in the lactic acid content, and decreases in pH observed at high temperature. The dominance of Lactobacillus is desirable during silage fermentation as it is associated with increasing lactic acid concentration while reducing the pH [14,21,22]. However, it is hard to explain why the number of LAB decreased and the Lactobacillus proportion declined with increases in organic acid and the gradual decline in pH in silages at 40°C after 60 days ensiling. This might because the microflora evaluation was only performed at the beginning of the process and at 30 and 60 days of fermentation, whereas the fermentation products were accumulated throughout the fermentation process. Another possible explanation is that, in addition to Lactobacillus, some other bacterial genera could regulate the fermentation of tropical forages over long periods of ensiling.

Nishino et al [17] suggested an association between the appearance of Enterobacter and high acetic acid content in tropical guinea grass silages by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis, however, the abundance of this genus was unclear, as DGGE analysis is not quantitative. In the present study, the bacterial community analyzed by high-throughput sequencing confirmed this suggestion. Enterobacter was the predominant genus for the silages of king grass, paspalum and stylo with high acetic acid concentration. Enterobacter is a common genus found during silage fermentation and, various species of the Enterobacter genus were found in forage silages like corn, alfalfa, guinea grass and other forages in the tropics [15,23,24]. This genus can grow under anaerobic conditions and can protect themselves to overcome adverse conditions [25]. The main fermentation end-product of this genus is acetic acid, and the metabolic activity will be enhanced at high temperature [26,27]. Regarding the inhibitory activity of acetic acid [17], the relative abundance of Enterobacter might account for the rapid decrease in undesirable microorganisms during the ensiling process and might be responsible for the findings of Ostling and Lindgren [28] who reported that Enterobacter exhibited a positive effect on silages, with an unexpected increase in storage stability.

Bifidobacterium is well known as an important intestinal probiotic for humans and animals. This genus possesses a unique fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase pathway employed to ferment carbohydrates to acetic acid and lactic acid [29]. Bifidobacterium was identified in this study, mostly in king grass silages, and the abundance at high temperature was higher than that in low temperature silages; this might partly be related to the high contents of lactic acid (7.1 g/kg DM) and acetic acid (38.5 g/kg DM) that were found in king grass after 60 days ensiling at high temperature. Similar results were also reported for natural fermented alfalfa silage [30], that Bifidobacterium abundance increased with high acetic acid content throughout the ensiling period.

Some other LAB genera i.e., Enterococcus, Weissella, Pediococcus, and Lactococcus were found at considerable proportions in these silages; similar results were also found in other temperate forages, i.e., oat, soybean and grass silages [3133]. Ni et al [33] suggested that cocci-shaped LAB were usually present in naturally fermented silages.

In this study, similar fermentation characteristics were observed for the tropical silages tested, except for white popinac, which produced few fermentation products. The chemical composition of white popinac showed that it had the highest DM content before ensiling with the highest residual WSC after ensiling, which might imply that the extent of fermentation was restricted. McDonald et al [2] reported that wilting is an important factor that directly influences the microflora. The wilting process selects for micro-organisms best able to survive under different moisture conditions. High DM reduces the activity of bacteria in silage and reduces the organic acid content for successful preservation. Muck et al [34] suggested that higher DM silage accumulated fermentation products slowly when compared with low DM samples, and that the rate and extent of fermentation during ensiling were limited by high DM content. Negative correlations between DM and acetic acid production was also demonstrated by Garcia et al [26] and Singh et al [35]. These previous results were consistent with our finding that white popinac silage had high DM and low concentrations of fermentation products, especially for acetic acid. However, high-throughput sequencing analysis found that white popinac silage contained a high proportion of genus Lactobacillus. The low content of organic acid and high pH of white popinac silage in this study might imply that the DM content affected the mechanism of the forage fermentation and that the quantity of LAB did not guarantee efficient tropical silage fermentation.

CONCLUSION

The fermentation characteristics, chemical composition and microbial community of the four tropical forages (king grass, paspalum, white popinac, and stylo) under different temperatures (28°C and 40°C) of ensiling were studied. The results indicated that the four tropical forage silages are prone to enhanced acetic acid production with increased temperature and prolonged ensiling. The fermentation of white popinac with high DM was slow with low concentrations of fermentation products. Cyanobacteria, as the predominant microorganism before ensiling, was mainly replaced by Lactobacillus and Enterobacter after ensiling. These two genera were probably most responsible for the unique fermentation pattern in these four tropical forages.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0502102), National Technology leader “Ten Thousand People Plan” (201502510410040) and National Science and Technology Support Programme for the 12th Five-year Plan (2011BAD17B02), China.

References

1. Panditharatne S, Allen VG, Fontenot JP, Jayasuriya MCN. Ensiling characteristics of tropical grasses as influenced by stage of growth, additives and chopping length. J Anim Sci 1986;63:197–207.
2. McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. The biochemistry of silage Marlow Bottom, UK: Chalcombe Publications; 1991.
3. Bayorbor TB, Kumai S, Fukumi R, Hattori I. Fermentation quality and feeding value of panic grasses and rhodesgrass silages. J Jpn Soc Grassl Sci 1993;39:334–42.
4. Kim KH, Uchida S. Comparative studies of ensiling characteristics between temperate and tropical species: 2. Mechanical pretreatments and changes in water soluble carbohydrate fractions during ensilage. J Jpn Soc Grassl Sci 1991;36:426–33.
5. Weinberg ZG, Szakacs G, Ashbell G, Hen Y. The effect of temperature on the ensiling process of corn and wheat. J Appl Microbiol 2001;90:561–6.
6. Ashbell G, Weinberg ZG, Hen Y, Filya I. The effects of temperature on the aerobic stability of wheat and corn silages. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2002;28:261–3.
7. Wang C, Nishino N. Effects of storage temperature and ensiling period on fermentation products, aerobic stability and microbial communities of total mixed ration silage. J Appl Microbiol 2013;114:1687–95.
8. Broderick GA, Kang JH. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino-acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci 1980;63:64–75.
9. Latimer GW. AOAC International Official methods of analysis of AOAC International 19th edth ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2012.
10. Van Soest PJ, Robertsom JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583–97.
11. Murphy RP. A method for the extraction of plant samples and the determination of total soluble carbohydrates. J Sci Food Agric 1958;9:714–7.
12. Ni K, Minh TT, Tu TT, et al. Comparative microbiota assessment of wilted Italian ryegrass, whole crop corn, and wilted alfalfa silage using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and next-generation sequencing. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;101:1385–94.
13. Zheng M, Niu D, Jiang D, Zuo S, Xu C. Dynamics of microbial community during ensiling direct-cut alfalfa with and without LAB inoculant and sugar. J Appl Microbiol 2017;122:1456–70.
14. Li L, Sun Y, Yuan Z, et al. Effect of microalgae supplementation on the silage quality and anaerobic digestion performance of Manyflower silvergrass. Bioresour Technol 2015;189:334–40.
15. Parvin S, Nishino N. Bacterial community associated with ensilage process of wilted guinea grass. J Appl Microbiol 2009;107:2029–36.
16. Yu Z, Naoki N, Guo XS. Chemical changes during ensilage and in sacco degradation of two tropical grasses: rhodesgrass and guineagrass treated with cell wall-degrading enzymes. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2011;24:214–21.
17. Nishino N, Li Y, Wang C, Parvin S. Effects of wilting and molasses addition on fermentation and bacterial community in guinea grass silage. Lett Appl Microbiol 2012;54:175–81.
18. Kim SC, Adesogan AT. Influence of ensiling temperature, simulated rainfall, and delayed sealing on fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of corn silage. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:3122–32.
19. Liu Q, Zhang J, Shi S, Sun Q. The effects of wilting and storage temperature on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of stylo silage. Anim Sci J 2011;82:549–53.
20. Danner H, Holzer M, Mayrhuber E, Braun R. Acetic acid increases stability of silage under aerobic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:562–7.
21. Li M, Zi X, Zhou H, Hou G, Cai Y. Effects of sucrose, glucose, molasses and cellulase on fermentation quality and in vitro gas production of king grass silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014;197:206–12.
22. Nishino N, Touno E. Ensiling characteristics and aerobic stability of direct-cut and wilted grass silages inoculated with Lactobacillus casei, or Lactobacillus buchneri . J Sci Food Agric 2005;85:1882–8.
23. Silva VP, Pereira OG, Leandro ES, et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria with bacteriocinogenic potential on the fermentation profile and chemical composition of alfalfa silage in tropical conditions. J Dairy Sci 2016;99:1895–902.
24. Santos AO, Ávila CLS, Pinto JC, et al. Fermentative profile and bacterial diversity of corn silages inoculated with new tropical lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 2015;120:266–79.
25. Pereira OG, Rocha KD, Ferreira CLLF. Chemical composition, characterization, and population of microorganisms on elephantgrass “Cameroon” (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum) and its silages. Rev Bras Zootec 2007;36:1742–50.
26. Garcia AD, Olson WG, Otterby DE, Linn JG, Hansen WP. Effects of temperature, moisture, and aeration on fermentation of alfalfa silage. J Dairy Sci 1989;72:93–103.
27. Rooke JA, Hatfield RD. Biochemistry of ensiling. In : Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH, eds. Silage Science and Technology, American Society of Agronomy Madison, WI, USA: ASA–CSSA–SSSA; 2003. p. 95–139.
28. Ostling C, Lindgren S. Influences of enterobacteria on the fermentation and aerobic stability of grass silages. Grass Forage Sci 1995;50:41–7.
29. Grill JP, Crociani J, Ballongue J. Characterization of fructose 6 phosphate phosphoketolases purified from Bifidobacterium species. Curr Microbiol 1995;31:49–54.
30. Zheng ML, Niu DZ, Jiang D, Zuo SS, Xu CC. Dynamics of microbial community during ensiling direct-cut alfalfa with and without lab inoculant and sugar. J Appl Microbiol 2017;122:1456–70.
31. Eikmeyer FG, Köfinger P, Poschenel A, et al. Metagenome analyses reveal the influence of the inoculant Lactobacillus buchneri CD034 on the microbial community involved in grass ensiling. J Biotechnol 2013;167:334–43.
32. Romero JJ, Zhao Y, Balseca-Paredes MA, et al. Laboratory silo type and inoculation effects on nutritional composition, fermentation, and bacterial and fungal communities of oat silage. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:1812–28.
33. Ni K, Wang F, Zhu B, et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses additives on the microbial community and fermentation quality of soybean silage. Bioresour Technol 2017;238:706–15.
34. Muck RE, Moser LE, Pitt RE. Postharvest factors affecting ensiling. In : Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH, eds. Silage Science and Technology Agronomy Monograph No. 42. Madison, WI, USA: ASA–CSSA–SSSA; 2003. p. 251–304.
35. Singh AP, Samanta AK, Misra AK, Upadhyay VS. Effect of wilting on silage quality of tropical grasses harvested at different intervals. Indian J Anim Sci 1999;69:727–9.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Principal component analysis of the four tropical forage samples on genus level. K, king grass; P, paspalum; W, white popinac; S, stylo; L, low temperature (28°C); H, high temperature (40°C); 30, 30 days; 60, 60 days.

Figure 2

Genus-level microbiota analysis of the four tropical forages during ensiling. K, king grass; P, paspalum; W, white popinac; S, stylo; L, low temperature (28°C); H, high temperature (40°C); 30, 30 days; 60, 60 days.

Table 1

Chemical and microbial composition of four tropical forages

Items King grass Paspalum White popinac Stylo
DM (% FM) 23.9 25.9 50.8 30.8
pH 6.7 6.2 6.1 6.0
CP (g/kg DM) 133 66.8 264 136
NDF (g/kg DM) 634 687 456 716
ADF (g/kg DM) 334 378 255 455
WSC (g/kg DM) 12.7 16.5 20.8 9.1
LAB (log cfu/g FM) 5.7 4.7 5.8 5.5
Molds (log cfu/g FM) 3.2 3.7 2.9 3.3
Yeasts (log cfu/g FM) 3.4 3.8 3.0 4.5

FM, fresh matter; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; WSC, water-soluble carbohydrates; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; cfu, colony forming units.

Table 2

Fermentation characteristics of four tropical forage silages during ensiling

Items 30 days 60 days SEM p-value



28°C 40°C 28°C 40°C D T D×T
King grass pH 5.6a 5.2b 5.1b 4.8c 0.039 <0.001 <0.001 0.537
LA 2.7c 5.4b 5.8b 7.1a 0.176 <0.001 <0.001 0.060
AA 24.8b 25.6b 37.2a 38.5a 0.727 <0.001 0.508 0.866
PA 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.1 0.096 0.779 0.685 0.192
BA 2.2b 2.5b 2.9b 4.7a 0.128 <0.001 0.002 0.021
NH3-N 10.1b 11.2b 15.5a 17.5a 0.391 <0.001 0.082 0.577
Paspalum pH 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.1 0.034 0.145 0.755 0.361
LA 1.1b 1.8ab 1.7ab 2.0a 0.103 0.059 0.039 0.438
AA 13.5b 14.9b 21.6a 22.7a 0.739 <0.001 0.431 0.936
PA 7.2d 9.2c 12.3b 16.5a 0.307 <0.001 0.001 0.113
BA 1.4b 1.7ab 2.0a 2.0a 0.068 0.006 0.256 0.401
NH3-N 3.9b 6.0ab 7.0a 7.0a 0.355 0.018 0.175 0.187
White popinac pH 5.8a 5.6b 5.7ab 5.3c 0.027 0.003 <0.001 0.069
LA 1.6b 2.3ab 1.9b 3.1a 0.142 0.107 0.009 0.418
AA 0.3c 0.3c 0.9a 0.7b 0.016 <0.001 0.163 0.003
PA 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.007 0.749 0.017 0.209
BA 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.016 0.857 0.070 0.223
NH3-N 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.054 0.881 0.777 0.444
Stylo pH 5.4a 4.9c 5.2b 4.8d 0.019 <0.001 <0.001 0.709
LA 1.9c 6.0a 4.0b 6.7a 0.121 <0.001 <0.001 0.028
AA 7.8b 8.0b 10.5a 12.3a 0.279 <0.001 0.116 0.185
PA 0.6ab 0.5b 0.7a 0.5b 0.015 0.314 0.008 0.788
BA 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.6 0.029 0.401 0.398 0.061
NH3-N 5.2 5.9 5.7 6.0 0.294 0.094 0.531 0.342

SEM, standard error of the mean; D, ensiling days; T, storage temperature; DM, dry matter; LA, lactic acid (g/kg DM); AA, acetic acid (g/kg DM); PA, propionic acid (g/kg DM); BA, butyric acid (g/kg DM); NH3-N, NH3-nitrogen (% total nitrogen).

a–d

Means within columns with different superscript letters differ significantly from each other (p<0.05).

Table 3

Chemical composition of four tropical forage silages during ensiling

Items 30 days 60 days SEM p-value



28°C 40°C 28°C 40°C D T D×T
King grass DM 22.2a 22.8a 19.8b 20.3b 1.256 <0.001 0.433 0.046
NDF 569b 606a 598a 589ab 3.887 0.466 0.098 0.018
ADF 337b 350ab 363a 346b 2.233 0.039 0.621 0.010
CP 113 118 112 113 0.949 0.124 0.212 0.399
WSC 3.6a 3.3a 3.4a 2.5b 0.086 0.014 0.007 0.150
Paspalum DM 25.3b 26.6a 23.9c 23.9c 6.841 <0.001 0.150 0.149
NDF 684 698 688 695 4.339 0.967 0.274 0.671
ADF 398 404 398 405 5.565 0.963 0.586 0.948
CP 60.6 60.0 60.3 59.7 1.415 0.271 0.236 0.316
WSC 3.7a 3.1b 2.8b 2.2c 0.067 <0.001 0.002 0.989
White popinac DM 50.5a 50.9a 47.3b 48.1b 2.591 <0.001 0.639 0.234
NDF 399 387 402 399 6.154 0.583 0.557 0.713
ADF 234 227 227 229 3.993 0.769 0.811 0.555
CP 268ab 264ab 275a 256b 1.935 0.991 0.019 0.083
WSC 10.5a 10.5a 9.9ab 9.5b 0.138 0.023 0.486 0.454
Stylo DM 29.6b 31.6a 28.7c 28.3c 3.021 <0.001 0.315 0.139
NDF 663 616 640 619 9.471 0.603 0.113 0.507
ADF 429 418 428 417 5.627 0.912 0.370 0.993
CP 133 135 134 134 0.938 0.032 0.016 0.109
WSC 3.9 4.3 4.0 3.7 0.168 0.797 0.456 0.317

SEM, standard error of the mean; D, ensiling days; T, storage temperature; DM, dry matter (% FM); NDF, neutral detergent fiber (g/kg DM); ADF, acid detergent fiber (g/kg DM); CP, crude protein (g/kg DM); WSC, water-soluble carbohydrates (g/kg DM).

a–c

Means within columns with different superscript letters differ significantly from each other (p<0.05).

Table 4

Microbial composition of four tropical forage silages during ensiling

Items Microorganism (log cfu/g FM) 30 days 60 days SEM p-value



28°C 40°C 28°C 40°C D T D×T
King grass LAB 6.2b 7.0a 7.4a 5.6c 0.089 0.429 0.013 <0.001
Yeasts ND ND ND ND - - - -
Molds ND ND ND ND - - - -
Paspalum LAB 5.1c 6.6b 7.6a 5.1c 0.102 0.027 0.086 <0.001
Yeasts ND ND ND ND - - - -
Molds ND ND ND ND - - - -
White popinac LAB 5.5c 6.2b 7.5a 4.8d 0.045 0.012 <0.001 <0.001
Yeasts ND ND ND ND - - - -
Molds 2.98 ND ND ND - - - -
Stylo LAB 5.1c 5.3b 6.6a 3.7d 0.056 0.836 <0.001 <0.001
Yeasts ND ND ND ND - - - -
Molds ND ND ND ND - - - -

FM, fresh matter; SEM, standard error of the mean; D, ensiling days; T, storage temperature; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; ND, not detected.

a–d

Means within columns with different superscript letters differ significantly from each other (p<0.05).

Table 5

Diversity statistics of bacterial community and abundances of the most relatively abundant bacterial genera during ensilage process

Sample Diversity statistics Abundance of genus (%)


OTU Chao Coverage Shannon Lactobacillus Enterobacter
K 260 374.43 0.996 2.35 0 0.1
KL30 195 328.00 0.997 2.83 8.2 60.7
KH30 218 327.77 0.996 3.07 20.8 49.3
KL60 172 245.70 0.997 2.64 25.8 53.9
KH60 273 344.08 0.997 2.36 19.8 9.2
P 1055 1801.82 0.978 3.91 0 0
PL30 356 408.98 0.997 4.08 0.2 27.5
PH30 225 341.00 0.996 3.08 5.3 46.9
PL60 246 388.68 0.996 3.04 7.4 49.2
PH60 138 202.69 0.998 1.91 0.4 64.4
W 124 167.33 0.998 0.47 0.3 0.2
WL30 270 460.38 0.996 3.31 26.5 5.1
WH30 291 459.00 0.995 3.03 44.4 9.0
WL60 252 333.00 0.997 3.24 38.4 26.7
WH60 565 631.28 0.997 4.95 14.2 0.9
S 161 196.88 0.998 1.43 0.3 0.2
SL30 163 270.65 0.997 2.57 2.9 63.3
SH30 158 215.12 0.998 2.56 6.8 66.5
SL60 188 287.04 0.997 2.73 3.1 74.6
SH60 192 209.10 0.999 2.64 7.2 66.6

OTU, operational taxonomic units; K, king grass; P, paspalum; W, white popinac; S, stylo; L, low temperature (28°C); H, high temperature (40°C). 30, 30 days; 60, 60 days.