Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. Search

CLOSE


Asian-Australas J Anim Sci > Volume 30(4); 2017 > Article
Meng, Wang, Liu, Zhou, Xu, Wang, and Fang: Identification of growth trait related genes in a Yorkshire purebred pig population by genome-wide association studies

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to identify genomic regions or genes controlling growth traits in pigs.

Methods

Using a panel of 54,148 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we performed a genome-wide Association (GWA) study in 562 pure Yorshire pigs with four growth traits: average daily gain from 30 kg to 100 kg or 115 kg, and days to 100 kg or 115 kg. Fixed and random model Circulating Probability Unification method was used to identify the associations between 54,148 SNPs and these four traits. SNP annotations were performed through the Sus scrofa data set from Ensembl. Bioinformatics analysis, including gene ontology analysis, pathway analysis and network analysis, was used to identify the candidate genes.

Results

We detected 6 significant and 12 suggestive SNPs, and identified 9 candidate genes in close proximity to them (suppressor of glucose by autophagy [SOGA1], R-Spondin 2 [RSPO2], mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 6 [MAP2K6], phospholipase C beta 1 [PLCB1], rho GTPASE activating protein 24 [ARHGAP24], cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 4 [CPEB4], GLI family zinc finger 2 [GLI2], neuronal tyrosine-phosphorylated phosphoinositide-3-kinase adaptor 2 [NYAP2], and zinc finger protein multitype 2 [ZFPM2]). Gene ontology analysis and literature mining indicated that the candidate genes are involved in bone, muscle, fat, and lung development. Pathway analysis revealed that PLCB1 and MAP2K6 participate in the gonadotropin signaling pathway and suggests that these two genes contribute to growth at the onset of puberty.

Conclusion

Our results provide new clues for understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying growth traits, and may help improve these traits in future breeding programs.

INTRODUCTION

Growth rate is an important factor in pig breeding programs as it is directly associated with economic benefits [1]. Growth rate is typically represented by traits such as average daily gain (ADG) and days to 100 or 115 kg (D100 or D115). In order to design better breeding programs and to improve production efficiency, it is important to understand the genetic determinants controlling these traits [2]. According to data in the pig quantitative trait locus (QTL) database, 15108 QTLs from 537 publications have been reported to be associated with 600 different traits [3]. Of these, 1315 QTLs are associated with growth traits, including 563 QTLs for ADG and 18 QTLs for days to different body weights (http://www.animalgenome.org/cgi-bin/QTLdb/SS/index, Apr 29, 2016). QTL data suggests that growth traits are controlled by many loci [1], but the causative genes or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are difficult to identify due to the low resolution and complex architecture of most QTLs [4,5].
Because of the availability of high-throughput genotyping platforms for SNPs, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has become a powerful method for dissecting the genetic basis underlying traits in both humans and animals. Since the development of the Illumina PorcineSNP60 Genotyping BeadChip, GWAS has been performed in commercial pig populations, revealing strong associations for economically important traits including body composition [6], meat quality [7], and reproductive performance [8]. Many GWAS have been performed in different pig populations in order to identify genes controlling production traits [1,2,9]. In a previous study, we performed a GWAS to analyze production traits in a Duroc male pig population and identified 14 candidate genes [2]. Two models were used to identify SNPs associated with feed conversion ratio, by which 13 significant SNPs were identified [9]. Another GWAS identified 127 significant SNPs and 102 suggestive SNPs associated with ADG in Italian Large White pigs [1]. When GWAS was used to examine residual feed intake and ADG in two extremely divergent purebred Yorkshire lines, significant SNPs were identified on several chromosomes including Sus scrofa chromosome (SSC)3, SSC5, SSC6, SSC7, SSC13, SSC14, and SSC15 [10].
To identify new candidate genes involved in pig growth, we performed a GWAS in a purebred Yorkshire pig population containing approximately 600 individuals for the growth traits D100, ADG100, ADG115, and D115, using the GeneSeek-Neogen Porcine SNP80 BeadChip.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Source population and phenotypes

Five hundred and sixtytwo commercial American Yorkshire female pigs were raised and performance-tested at the Beijing Breeding Swine Center (Beijing, China). All animals were born at the end of 2013 and raised under identical standard conditions. No open wounds or other signs of illness, injury, or abnormal behavior, were observed at any time. Sample (ear tissue) collection was conducted based on procedures described previously [2]. The protocol for ear tissue collection was approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of the China Agricultural University (Approval number: XK257).
Four traits were recorded for individual pigs: D100 and D115 (days to 100 or 115 kg of body weight), and ADG100 and ADG115 (ADG between 30 and 100 or 115 kg). Phenotypes were collected using the Osborne FIRE Pig Performance Testing System (Osborne, KS, USA) at the Beijing Breeding Swine Center (Beijing, China). D100, D115, ADG100, and ADG115 were used in the subsequent genome-wide association analysis.

Genotyping and quality control

DNA was extracted from ear tissue using phenol-chloroform [11]. DNA quality and quantity were assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Genotyping was conducted using the GeneSeek-Neogen Porcine SNP80 BeadChip (Beijing Kangpusen Biological Technology Co., LTD, Beijing, China). Data mining was performed in our laboratory.
To reduce false-positive associations resulting from genotyping, we controlled our SNP analysis with a genotyping call rate ≥90% (individuals and SNP) and a Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium p≥10−6. Considering that rare SNPs have lower statistical power, SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥3% were selected for further analysis. All SNPs located on the chromosome Y were removed.

Genome-wide association studies analysis

The GWAS were performed as described previously, using our Fixed and random model Circulating Probability Unification method (FarmCPU) [12]. Bonferroni multiple testing was used to correct the genome-wide significant (0.05/N) and suggestive (1/N) thresholds, where N is number of SNPs used in the analysis. The quantile–quantile (Q–Q) plot, which is a commonly used tool for scanning the population stratification in GWA studies, was always implemented in the test [13]. Principle component analysis was performed by Plink v1.07 [14].

Functional analysis

To identify functionally plausible candidate genes, we searched for the closest annotated gene within a 1 Mb region centered on each significant or suggestive SNP in the pig reference genome assembly. The gene identifiers were used to identify the orthologous mouse genes in Ensemble BioMart (http://www.ensembl.org/biomart/martview). Using the mouse orthologs, gene ontology (GO) analysis was carried out using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources version 6.7 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) [15]. A gene network analysis, using the names of the candidate genes, was performed in GeneMANIA (http://genemania.org/).

RESULTS

Phenotype and single nucleotide polymorphisms data summary

Phenotype data for the four traits of interest are summarized in Table 1. All traits were approximately normally distributed. After a series of filtering steps, 2,878 SNPs with no physical location, 14 SNPs located on chromosome Y, 342 SNPs with call rate below 90% and 7,146 SNPs with MAF lower than 3% were removed. In total, 54,148 SNPs were available for GWA analysis (Table 2). The average physical distance between two neighboring SNPs on the same chromosome was approximately 45.9 Kb, ranging from 31.2 Kb (SSC12) to 61.5 Kb (SSCX). Based on the length of each chromosome in the USDA-MARC v2 (A) linkage map, the average genetic distance between adjacent SNPs was 0.043 cM, with a maximum of 0.056 cM (SSC17) and a minimum of 0.028 cM (SSC1) (Table 2).

Significant single nucleotide polymorphisms

Based on multidimensional scaling analysis, no obvious population structure was observed in our population. The p-value profiles (−log p-value) of all SNPs associated with the four traits are shown in Figure 1 (analyzed using FarmCPU). The genome-wide significant or suggestive SNPs associated with the four growth traits are shown in Table 3. In total, 6 genome-wide significant and 12 genome-wide suggestive SNPs were associated with the ADG100, ADG115, D100, and D115 traits.
Five of the six significant SNPs associated with multiple traits. SNP ALGA0110960 located on SSC15 associated with four traits. SNPs WU_10.2_17_45522054 and INRA0050471 both associated with the D100 and ADG100 traits. MARC0014829, located on SSC17, associated with D100 and ADG100, whereas MARC0061404, located on SSC15, associated with D115 and ADG115. The suggestive SNP ALGA0093561, located on SSC17, associated with ADG100 and D115. Finally, three suggestive SNPs associated with D100; a significant and two suggestive SNPs associated with D115; four suggestive SNPs and two suggestive SNPs associated with ADG100 and ADG115, respectively (Table 3).

Growth-related candidate genes

To identify growth-related candidate genes, the annotated genes closest to significant and suggestive SNPs were identified and then evaluated through literature mining to assess their biological functions. The search yielded nine candidate genes potentially associated with D100, ADG100, D115, and ADG115. These genes are: suppressor of glucose by autophagy (SOGA1), GLI family zinc finger 2 (GLI2), neuronal tyrosine-phosphorylated phosphoinositide-3-kinase adaptor 2 (NYAP2), zinc finger protein multitype 2 (ZFPM2), rho GTPASE activating protein 24 (ARHGAP24), R-Spondin 2 (RSPO2), mitogen activated protein kinase kinase (MAP2K6), phospholipase C beta 1 (PLCB1), and cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 4 (CPEB4). The result from a network analysis of the candidate genes is shown in Figure 4. Most of the related genes in the network also exhibit functions associated with growth traits, either directly or indirectly. For example, glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 3 (AGPAT9) plays an important role in adipocyte differentiation and triacylglycerol biosynthesis [16].

DISCUSSION

GWAS is a powerful method to identify the mutations or genes underlying complex traits in domestic animals [4]. In the pig, GWAS has been performed to identify candidate genes for traits related to production [2], body composition [6], reproduction [17], and immunity [18]. In this study, GWAS was performed for four growth traits (ADG100, ADG115, D100, and D115), for which 6 genome-wide significant and 12 genome-wide suggestive SNPs were identified. It is well known that the accuracy of GWAS can be compromised by population stratification [19]. In contrast to humans, the relatively simple genetic background found in domestic animals makes it easier to identify loci that are truly responsible for corresponding traits [4]. The Yorkshire pigs used in this study had a similar genetic structure because they originated from a single farm. In addition, multidimensional scaling and Q-Q plots showed no obvious population structure in our population (Figures 1 and 2). This suggests that GWAS yielded valid results in our study.
Most of the candidate genes we identified function in growth-related pathways, directly or indirectly. For example, SOGA1 participates in glucose production regulated by adiponectin, and was associated with the residual feed intake trait in another GWAS with Yorkshire boars [20,21]. Candidate gene ARHGAP24 is a key regulator of angiogenesis through its effects on endothelial cell migration, proliferation and capillary tube formation [22]. In our previous GWAS with Duroc male pigs, five suggestive SNPs, all associated with both D100 and ADG, were located within the ARHGAP24 gene [2]. This suggests that ARHGP24 is an important gene involved in growth. Furthermore, GO analysis indicates that most of the genes located close to the significant or suggestive SNPs are involved in lung development, respiratory system development, blood vessel morphogenesis, heart development and regulation of transcription (Table 4). Pathway analysis shows that candidate genes PLCB1 and MAP2K6 genes participate in the gonadotropin signaling pathway (GnRH) (Figure 3). A GWAS based on genetic, physiological and metabolomics data suggested that the gonadotropin signaling pathway is associated with divergent growth at the onset of puberty in cattle [23]. GnRH signaling also plays an important role in growth at the onset of puberty in mammals [24,25]. MAP2K6 plays an important role in adipocytes and glucose transporter expression [2628] and PLCB1 is required for 3T3-L1 adipocyte and C2C12 myoblast differentiation [29,30]. These results suggest that the growth trait is affected in puberty through the GnRH signal pathway (MAP2K6 and PLCB1) in Yorkshire gilts. Other candidate genes are involved in the physiology of growth, such as GLI2 in myogenesis and osteoblast differentiation [31], NYAP2 in brain size, neurite elongation and neuronal morphogenesis [32], and ZFPM2 in adipogenesis [33].
Because the ADG and D100 or D115 traits measure similar (although not identical) growth stage periods, it is expected that some significant SNPs will associate with more than one trait [34], while each trait will be associated uniquely with specific SNPs. Our results agree, in part, with previous QTL mapping and GWA studies. For example, a QTL associated with ADG on SSC15 has been located in a region between 135.2 Mb and 149.8 Mb [35]. Our results identified two significant SNPs (INRA0050471 and MARC0061404) located at 140 Mb on the same chromosome. A region on SSC4 at approximately 34 Mb was associated in another GWAS with ADG in a Yorkshire population, in close proximity to the ZFPM2 gene [10]. Our study associated D115 with a significant SNP (ASGA001916) that is also close to this gene. Finally, our previous GWAS identified five suggestive SNPs, associated with both D100 and ADG, located within the ARHGAP24 gene in a Duroc male population [2]. In the present study, we identified a suggestive SNP (ALGA0113286) associated with D100, located close to the ARHGAP24 gene.
It is surprising that our results overlap only partially with our previous study. Possible reasons include: large numbers of causal variants with smaller effects are difficult to identify statistically [2], the pure pig population used in this study excluded many monomorphic SNPs, and incomplete power of different experimental designs [1].
In summary, using a panel of 54,148 SNPs, nine candidate genes were identified for the four growth-related traits D100 and D115 (days to 100 or 115 kg of body weight) and ADG100 and ADG115 (ADG between 30 and 100 or 115 kg). Further analysis revealed six significant and 12 suggestive SNPs, potentially causative mutations, in or near genes whose functions are plausibly growth-related. Further experimentation will be required to confirm the functions of these genes and elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying growth traits.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Beijing San Yuan Breeding Technology CO., LTD Independent Project (SYZYZ20140007), Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant 31372275) and Program for Changjiang Scholar and Innovation Research Team in University (IRT1191).

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Figure 1
Manhattan plots for the four growth traits examined in the genome-wide association study using Yorkshire pigs. The quantile-quantile plots on the right show the observed versus expected log p-values.
ajas-30-4-462f1.gif
Figure 2
Principle component analysis (PCA) plot of population structure showing the top two principle components. C1: principle component 1; C2: principle component 2.
ajas-30-4-462f2.gif
Figure 3
GnRH signaling pathway containing PLCB1 and MAP2K6. GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; PLCB1, phospholipase C beta 1; MAP2K6, mitogen activated protein kinase kinas.
ajas-30-4-462f3.gif
Figure 4
Gene network showing the 9 candidate genes and their potential interactions.
ajas-30-4-462f4.gif
Table 1
Descriptive statistics for growth traits in a Yorkshire pig population
Traits Units N Mean SD Min Max
ADG100 g 562 617.64 44.29 428.19 745.53
D100 day 562 161.15 11.91 131.86 230.06
ADG115 g 562 645.94 53.15 455.86 795.59
D115 day 562 177.73 15.09 142.31 249.00

Mean, standard deviation (SD), minimum (Min), and maximum (Max) values are presented for all phenotypes included in the association study (N).

Table 2
Distribution of SNPs after quality control and average distance between adjacent SNPs on each chromosome
SSC SNP no. Physical size1) (Mb) Mb/SNP Linkage map2) (cM) cM/SNP
1 5169 315.32 0.0610 144.0 0.0279
2 3451 162.57 0.0471 132.1 0.0383
3 3012 144.79 0.0481 129.3 0.0429
4 3192 143.47 0.0449 130.1 0.0408
5 2427 111.51 0.0459 114.4 0.0471
6 3685 157.77 0.0428 165.7 0.0450
7 3288 134.76 0.0410 156.6 0.0476
8 2925 148.49 0.0508 127.7 0.0437
9 3251 153.67 0.0473 138.5 0.0426
10 2283 79.10 0.0346 124.1 0.0544
11 1872 87.69 0.0468 84.9 0.0454
12 2039 63.59 0.0312 113.1 0.0555
13 3683 218.64 0.0594 126.2 0.0343
14 3440 153.85 0.0447 111.5 0.0324
15 2966 157.68 0.0532 111.8 0.0377
16 1959 86.90 0.0444 93.2 0.0476
17 1732 69.70 0.0402 97.0 0.0560
18 1427 61.22 0.0429 57.6 0.0404
X 2347 144.29 0.0615 128.4 0.0547
Total 54148 - - - -

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphisms; SSC, Sus scrofa chromosome.

1) The physical size is based on Sus scrofa Build 10.2 (http://www.ensembl.org/Sus_scrofa/Info/Index).

2) The linkage map is based on USDA-MARC v2 (A) (http://www.thearkdb.org/).

Table 3
Significant and suggestive SNPs associated with growth traits
SNP Traits SSC Location1) (bp) p-value Nearest gene Distance/bp
WU_10.2_17_45522054 D100*; ADG100* 17 45522054 5.78E-08; 4.37E-07 SOGA1 within
ALGA0110960 D100*; ADG100#; D115*; ADG115* 15 35228926 7.79E-08; 3.47E-06; 2.70E-07; 7.67E-07 GLI2 38777
MARC0014829 D100*; ADG100# 17 51033200 1.19E-07; 1.77E-06; SRSF6 479795
INRA0050471 D100*; ADG100* 15 140897463 3.83E-07; 4.68E-07 NYAP2 256423
MARC0061404 D115*; ADG115* 15 140308646 1.02E-07; 2.03E-07 NYAP2 225833
ASGA0019176 D115* 4 33852153 3.01E-07 ZFPM2 380829
ALGA0003158 D100# 1 53964692 1.73E-06 NA -
ALGA0113286 D100# 8 142733110 1.93E-06 ARHGAP24 85941
MARC0111602 D100# 4 32117997 3.26E-06 RSPO2 151369
WU_10.2_12_10905724 ADG100# 12 10905724 1.86E-06 MAP2K6 233768
ALGA0093561 ADG100#; D115# 17 20006406 4.65E-06; 6.00E-06 PLCB1 145494
ALGA0053672 ADG100# 9 75482434 6.03E-06 C7orf62 68647
ALGA0003143 ADG100# 1 53604351 8.93E-06 NA -
WU_10.2_16_54456039 ADG100# 16 54456039 1.38E-05 CPEB4 357499
WU_10.2_8_970500 D115# 8 970500 2.56E-06 NA -
ASGA0105121 D115# 8 19299981 4.90E-06 NA -
WU_10.2_1_11220855 ADG115# 1 11220855 6.60E-06 SNX9 32725
H3GA0004299 ADG115# 1 283645137 1.07E-05 SUSD1 within

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphisms; SSC, Sus scrofa chromosome.

1) Derived from the current porcine genome sequence assembly (Sscrofa10.2) (http://www.ensembl.org/Susscrofa/Info/Index).

NA, the physical distance to gene closest to SNP>1 Mb;

* genome-wide significant;

# genome-wide suggestive.

Table 4
Gene ontology analysis of nearest genes
Category Term Count p-value Genes
GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0030324~lung development 2 0.048 ZFPM2, GLI2
GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0030323~respiratory tube development 2 0.049 ZFPM2, GLI2
GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0060541~respiratory system development 2 0.054 ZFPM2, GLI2
GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0048514~blood vessel morphogenesis 2 0.084 ARHGAP24, ZFPM2
GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0007507~heart development 2 0.095 ZFPM2, GLI2
GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0000122~negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter 2 0.098 ZFPM2, GLI2

REFERENCES

1. Fontanesi L, Schiavo G, Galimberti G, Calo DG., & Russo V. A genomewide association study for average daily gain in Italian Large White pigs. J Anim Sci. 2014; 92:1385–94.
crossref pmid
2. Wang K, Liu D., & Hernandez-Sanchez J. , et alGenome wide association analysis reveals new production trait genes in a male duroc population. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10:e0139207
crossref pmid pmc
3. Hu ZL, Park CA., & Reecy JM. Developmental progress and current status of the animal QTLdb. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44:D827–33.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Andersson L. Genome-wide association analysis in domestic animals: a powerful approach for genetic dissection of trait loci. Genetica. 2009; 136:341–9.
crossref pmid
5. Sanchez MP, Tribout T., & Iannuccelli N. , et alA genome-wide association study of production traits in a commercial population of Large White pigs: evidence of haplotypes affecting meat quality. Genet Sel Evol. 2014; 46:12
crossref pmid pmc
6. Fan B, Onteru SK., & Du ZQ. , et alGenome-wide association study identifies Loci for body composition and structural soundness traits in pigs. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6:e14726
crossref pmid pmc
7. Luo W, Cheng D., & Chen S. , et alGenome-wide association analysis of meat quality traits in a porcine Large White x Minzhu intercross population. Int J Biol Sci. 2012; 8:580–95.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Onteru SK, Fan B., & Nikkila MT. , et alWhole-genome association analyses for lifetime reproductive traits in the pig. J Anim Sci. 2011; 89:988–95.
crossref pmid
9. Sahana G, Kadlecova V, Hornshoj H, Nielsen B., & Christensen OF. A genome-wide association scan in pig identifies novel regions associated with feed efficiency trait. J Anim Sci. 2013; 91:1041–50.
crossref pmid
10. Onteru SK, Gorbach DM., & Young JM. , et alWhole genome association studies of residual feed intake and related traits in the pig. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8:e61756
crossref pmid pmc
11. Bai Y, Zhang JB., & Xue Y. , et alDifferential expression of CYB5A in Chinese and European pig breeds due to genetic variations in the promoter region. Anim Genet. 2015; 46:16–22.
crossref pmid
12. Liu X, Huang M, Fan B, Buckler ES., & Zhang Z. Iterative usage of fixed and random effect models for powerful and efficient genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 2016; 12:e1005767
crossref pmid pmc
13. Pearson TA., & Manolio TA. How to interpret a genome-wide association study. JAMA. 2008; 299:1335–44.
crossref pmid
14. Purcell S, Neale B., & Todd-Brown K. , et alPLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 81:559–75.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Huang da W, Sherman BT., & Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009; 4:44–57.
crossref pmid
16. Shan D, Li JL., & Wu L. , et alGPAT3 and GPAT4 are regulated by insulin-stimulated phosphorylation and play distinct roles in adipogenesis. J Lipid Res. 2010; 51:1971–81.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Onteru SK, Fan B., & Du ZQ. , et alA whole-genome association study for pig reproductive traits. Anim Genet. 2012; 43:18–26.
crossref pmid
18. Wang JY, Luo YR., & Fu WX. , et alGenome-wide association studies for hematological traits in swine. Anim Genet. 2013; 44:34–43.
crossref pmid
19. Bouaziz M, Ambroise C., & Guedj M. Accounting for population stratification in practice: a comparison of the main strategies dedicated to genome-wide association studies. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6:e28845
crossref pmid pmc
20. Cowherd RB, Asmar MM., & Alderman JM. , et alAdiponectin lowers glucose production by increasing SOGA. Am J Pathol. 2010; 177:1936–45.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Do DN, Strathe AB, Ostersen T, Pant SD., & Kadarmideen HN. Genome-wide association and pathway analysis of feed efficiency in pigs reveal candidate genes and pathways for residual feed intake. Front Genet. 2014; 5:307
crossref pmid pmc
22. Su ZJ, Hahn CN., & Goodall GJ. , et alA vascular cell-restricted RhoGAP, p73RhoGAP, is a key regulator of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101:12212–7.
crossref pmid pmc
23. Widmann P, Reverter A., & Fortes MR. , et alA systems biology approach using metabolomic data reveals genes and pathways interacting to modulate divergent growth in cattle. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14:798
crossref pmid pmc
24. Yingling VR. A delay in pubertal onset affects the covariation of body weight, estradiol, and bone size. Calcif Tissue Int. 2009; 84:286–96.
crossref pmid pmc
25. Yingling VR., & Khaneja A. Short-term delay of puberty causes a transient reduction in bone strength in growing female rats. Bone. 2006; 38:67–73.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Fujishiro M, Gotoh Y., & Katagiri H. , et alThree mitogen-activated protein kinases inhibit insulin signaling by different mechanisms in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Mol Endocrinol. 2003; 17:487–97.
crossref pmid
27. Engelman JA, Berg AH., & Lewis RY. , et alConstitutively active mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 6 (MKK6) or salicylate induces spontaneous 3T3-L1 adipogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274:35630–8.
crossref pmid
28. Fujishiro M, Gotoh Y., & Katagiri H. , et alMKK6/3 and p38 MAPK pathway activation is not necessary for insulin-induced glucose uptake but regulates glucose transporter expression. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:19800–6.
crossref pmid
29. O’Carroll SJ, Mitchell MD, Faenza I, Cocco L., & Gilmour RS. Nuclear PLCbeta1 is required for 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation and regulates expression of the cyclin D3-cdk4 complex. Cell Signal. 2009; 21:926–35.
crossref pmid
30. Faenza I, Bavelloni A., & Fiume R. , et alExpression of phospholipase C beta family isoenzymes in C2C12 myoblasts during terminal differentiation. J Cell Physiol. 2004; 200:291–6.
crossref pmid
31. Gerber AN, Wilson CW, Li YJ., & Chuang PT. The hedgehog regulated oncogenes Gli1 and Gli2 block myoblast differentiation by inhibiting MyoD-mediated transcriptional activation. Oncogene. 2007; 26:1122–36.
crossref pmid pmc
32. Yokoyama K, Tezuka T., & Kotani M. , et alNYAP: a phosphoprotein family that links PI3K to WAVE1 signalling in neurons. EMBO J. 2011; 30:4739–54.
crossref pmid pmc
33. Jack BH., & Crossley M. GATA proteins work together with friend of GATA (FOG) and C-terminal binding protein (CTBP) co-regulators to control adipogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285:32405–14.
crossref pmid pmc
34. Zhang Z, Zhang H., & Pan RY. , et alGenetic parameters and trends for production and reproduction traits of a Landrace herd in China. J Integr Agric. 2016; 15:1069–75.
crossref
35. Liu G, Kim JJ., & Jonas E. , et alCombined line-cross and half-sib QTL analysis in Duroc-Pietrain population. Mamm Genome. 2008; 19:429–38.
crossref pmid


ABOUT
SPECIALTIES
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS
Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul
08776, Korea   TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : jongkha@hotmail.com               

Copyright © 2017 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next