• Home
  • E-Submission
  • Sitemap
  • Contact Us
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. Search

CLOSE


Go to Top Go to Bottom
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci > Volume 29(10); 2016 > Article
Kang, Park, and Kim: Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Red Ginseng By-product on Laying Performance, Blood Biochemistry, Serum Immunoglobulin and Microbial Population in Laying Hens

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the effect of dietary supplementation of red ginseng by-product (RGB) on the laying performance, blood biochemistry, and microbial population in laying hens. A total of 120 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (75 weeks old) were randomly allotted to 1 of 3 dietary treatments with 4 replicates per treatment. A commercial-type basal diet was prepared, and 2 additional diets were prepared by supplementing 5.0 or 10.0 g/kg of RGB to the basal diet at the expense of corn. The diets were fed to hens on an ad libitum basis for 4 weeks. There were no differences in feed intake, egg weight, and feed conversion ratio during 4 weeks of the feeding trial. However, hen-day egg production was significantly greater (p<0.05) for the RGB treatment groups than that for the basal treatment group. There were no differences in triglyceride, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase during the 4-week feeding trial. However, RGB supplementation increased (p<0.05) the serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM content compared with basal treatment group. The total cholesterol was lower (p<0.05) in the RGB treatments groups than that in the basal treatment group. The intestinal Lactobacillus population was greater (p<0.05) for the RGB treatments groups than that for the basal treatment group. However, the numbers of Salmonella and Escherichia coli were not different among dietary treatments. During the entire experiment, there was no significant difference in egg quality among all the treatments. In conclusion, in addition to improving hen-day production, there were positive effects of dietary RGB supplementation on serum immunoglobulin and cholesterol levels in laying hens.

INTRODUCTION

Ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) is a traditional medicinal plant, and has been widely used over 2,000 years in Korea, Japan, and China (Szeto et al., 2010). Ginseng contains saponin, ginsenosides, essential oils, polyacetylenic alcohol, peptides, vitamins, and polysaccharides (Cheung et al., 2007; Kang et al., 2007; Jin et al., 2008; Wee et al., 2011). Various beneficial pharmacological effects of ginseng or its components have been reported, including anti-cancer, anti-allergy, anti-inflammatory, anti-fatigue, anti-stress, and immunomodulatory activities (Kim et al., 2002; Park et al, 2004; Sumiyoshi et al., 2010; Lee and Cho, 2011). Red ginseng is produced by steaming fresh ginseng at 95°C to 100°C for a reasonable time (Kim et al., 2009). It is known to have greater pharmaceutical efficacy and functionality than white ginseng, due to its high saponin content (Kim and In, 2010). Also, red ginseng may be useful for the treatment of hypertension and pulmonary vascular obstruction (Han et al., 2005) and has immune stimulatory and antioxidant activity as well as vasorelaxing effects in several arterial vessels (Gillis, 1997; Shin et al., 2000). Previous studies with animals have demonstrated the potential effects of ginseng as an immunization agent against various pathogens (Hu et al., 2003; Rivera et al., 2003). For example, dietary supplementation of red ginseng extracts has been shown to improve egg production of laying hens (Jang et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2015). Many studies have indicated that saponin is a potentially bioactive ingredient of red ginseng (Ao et al., 2011). The extraction of red ginseng creates by-product has a potential bioactive and immunostimulant additive to animal feed. To the best of our knowledge, limited research has been published on the effects of dietary red ginseng marc on immune system and the intestinal microflora of laying hens. Therefore, this study was performed to investigate the effects of dietary red ginseng by-product (RGB) supplementation on egg production, egg quality, blood biochemistry, serum immunoglobulins and microbial population in laying hens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The protocol for this experiment was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Welfare Committee of the National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Korea.

Preparation of red ginseng by-product

The RGB was obtained from Korean Ginseng Nonghyup (Geumsan, Korea). RGB was first dried and ground finely using a Wiley mill (J-NCM, Jisico Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea). RGB saponins were extracted according to the method described in the previous research (Sung and Lee, 2008). The nutrient composition of the RGB was analyzed in duplicate for dry matter (AOAC, 1990; method 934.01), crude ash (AOAC, 1990; method 934.01), crude fat (AOAC, 1990; method 942.05), crude protein (AOAC, 1990; method 988.05), and crude fiber (AOAC, 1990; method; 978.01), and the results are presented in Table 1.

Birds and experimental design

A total of 120, 75-week-old Hy-Line Brown laying hens were randomly allotted to 1 of 3 dietary treatments. Each treatment had 4 replicates with 5 cages and 2 hens per cage (30×37×40 cm = width×length×height). A commercial type basal diet was formulated to meet or exceed nutrient recommendations of the National Research Council (NRC, 1994) for laying hens (Table 2). Two additional diets were prepared by supplementing 5.0 or 10.0 g/kg of RGB to the basal diet at the expense of corn. The experimental period was 4 weeks. During the experiment, hens were provided with feed and water ad libitum and were exposed to a 16-h:8-h light:dark lighting schedule. The temperature and humidity of the laying house was maintained at 18°C±3°C and 65% to 70%, respectively, during the experiment.

Laying performance and egg quality

Hen-day egg production rate and egg weight were recorded daily, whereas feed intake and feed conversion ratio were recorded weekly. Ten eggs per replicate were randomly collected at the end of the each week to measure eggshell strength, eggshell thickness, eggshell color, and Haugh units (HU). Eggshell strength was measured by the Texture Systems compression test cell (model T2100C, Food Technology Co., Ltd., Rockville, MD, USA) and was expressed as units of compression force exposed to units of eggshell surface area (kg/cm2). Eggshell thickness (without the inner and outer shell membrane) was determined at three different points (top, middle, and bottom) using a dial pipe gauge (model 7360, Mitutoyo Co. Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan) without cracking the eggshell. Egg yolk color was evaluated by the Roche color fan (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; 15 = dark orange; 1 = light pale). The HU values were calculated using a micrometer (model S-8400, Ames, Waltham, MA, USA) from the following formula described by Eisen et al. (1965): HU = 100 log (H–1.7W0.37+7.6), where W is egg weight and H is albumen height.

Sample collection

At the end of the 28-day feeding trial, 2 birds/replicate with a body weight close to the average (i.e., 8 birds per treatment) were selected to be euthanized by cervical dislocation. Immediately after death, a 5-mL blood sample was collected from the jugular vein of each bird using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid vacuum tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and stored on ice. Serum samples, obtained by centrifuging the samples for 20 min at 25,000×g and 4°C, were stored at −15°C. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), triglyceride, and total cholesterol in the serum were quantified using an ADVIA 1650 chemistry system (Bayer Diagnostic, Putraux, France). The cecal contents were collected from the euthanized chickens and used for analyzing bacterial populations. The cecum was ligated at both sides and removed from the gastrointestinal tract, and the contents were aseptically collected into a 2-mL Eppendorf tube. The cecal contents were immediately frozen at −80°C before analysis.

Measurement of serum IgG and IgM concentration

The plasma samples were used to measure the concentrations of immunoglobulin (IgG) and IgM isotypes by using chicken IgG, IgA, and IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay quantification kits, respectively (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA). Briefly, flat-bottomed microtiter plates were coated for 60 min with capture antibody (purified goat anti-chicken IgG or IgM) and coating buffer (0.05 M carbonate-bicarbonate, pH 9.6). They were washed 3 times with washing solution (50 mM Tris-buffered saline, 0.14 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 8.0); subsequently, blocking solution (50 mM Tris-buffered saline, 0.14 M NaCl, 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), pH 8.0) was added to the wells for 30 min, and then the wells were rinsed 3 times with washing solution. The calibrator (chicken reference plasma) and sample-conjugate diluent (50 mM Tris-buffered saline, 0.14 mM NaCl, 1% BSA, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 8.0) were used to prepare standards, whereas plasma samples, which were thawed at 4°C overnight, were diluted at 1:1,000 in the sample-conjugate diluent. Subsequently, they were added to the wells for 60 min and washed 5 times with washing solution. The detection antibody horseradish peroxidase (goat anti-chicken IgG, or IgM) diluted in sample-conjugate diluent was added to the wells, incubated for 60 min, and rinsed 5 times with washing solution. Next, the enzyme substrate (3,3′,5,5′-tetramethyl benzidine peroxidase substrate and peroxidase solution B) was added, and the samples were incubated for 15 min (IgM) or 30 min (IgG). Finally, 2 M H2SO4 was used to stop the enzyme substrate reaction. A microtiter plate reader (Spectramax 190; Molecular Device, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) was used to measure the absorbance at 450 nm. The immunoglobulin (IgG or IgM) titers were determined by developing a four-parameter logistic curve fit by using the Hy-line brown laying hen reference plasma absorbance.

Measurement of microbial populations

The composite cecal material sample (1 g) of each hen was diluted with 9 mL of 0.9% saline solution and mixed using a vortex. Viable counts of bacteria in the cecal samples were then estimated by plating serial 10-fold dilutions (in 1% peptone solution) on lactobacilli de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (Lactobacilli MRS), MacConkey, and Salmonella shigella agar plates (Difco Laboratories, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) in order to isolate Lactobacillus, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella, respectively. The Lactobacilli MRS plates were then incubated for 48 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions, and the MacConkey and Salmonella shigella plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C under aerobic conditions. Lactobacillus, E. coli, and Salmonella colonies were counted immediately after removal from the incubator.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance as a completely randomized design using the PROC MIXED procedure (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Outlier data were identified by the UNIVARIATE procedure of SAS, but no outliers were found. Least squares means were calculated and the means among treatments were compared by the PDIFF option with the Tukey adjustment. Significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There were no differences in feed intake, egg weight, and feed conversion ratio during the 4 weeks of the feeding trial among groups. However, hen-day egg production was greater (p<0.05) for RGB treatment groups than that for basal treatment group, and no significant differences were observed among the RGB treatment groups (Table 3). It was previously suggested that ginseng may improve physiological function and immunity, and exerts various pharmacological effects (Kiefer and Pantuso, 2003). Therefore, a beneficial influence of RGB on performance was expected. Jang et al. (2007) and Kim et al. (2015) reported that fermented wild ginseng culture by-product or red ginseng extracts could increase egg production, which may be attributed to the improvement in the health status of birds fed diets supplemented with ginseng. Jenkins and Atwal (1994) suggested that dietary saponins (main bioactive compounds in ginseng) had adverse effects on growth performance and feed intake of chicks due to their bitter taste. In contrast, no reduction of feed intake due to RGB supplementation was observed in the current experiment. Due to the limited experiments on ginseng in livestock, further studies are needed to be conducted.
In addition, the supplementation of RGB did not have an effect on eggshell strength, eggshell thickness, egg yolk color, and HU during the feeding trial (Table 4). Similar to the present study, Ao et al. (2011) reported that egg qualities were not affected by the supplementation level of red ginseng extracts. However, Jang et al. (2007) observed that supplemented red ginseng could improve egg quality compared to the basal treatment. These conflicting results may be due to different strains, ginseng sources, or methods of their preparation, as reported by Ao et al. (2011). There were no differences in triglyceride, AST, and ALT levels during the 4 weeks of the feeding trial (Table 5). However, the serum IgG and IgM concentrations of the chickens fed RGB supplemented diet were 10.5% and 29.14% higher than those in the basal treatment group respectively, whereas no significant differences were observed among the RGB treatment groups (Table 6). Hu et al. (2003) reported that RGB could have a beneficial effect on immune function. This study also showed that RGB may have positive effect on the immune system of laying hens.
In the current experiment, reduced serum cholesterol by RGB supplementation in the diets is likely caused by the inhibition of cholesterol or bile acid absorption as was observed with ginseng feeding (Oakenfull and Sidhu, 1990). Some saponins form insoluble complexes with cholesterol in the digesta and inhibit the intestinal absorption of endogenous and exogenous cholesterol (Rao and Gurfinkel, 2000). Previous experiments suggested that dietary ginseng impaired avian hepatic cholesterogensis and reduced serum total cholesterol (Qureshi et al., 1983; Muwalla and Abuirmelieh, 1990). Jang et al. (2007) reported that total cholesterol was decreased by supplementation of red ginseng extracts in the diet of laying hens. The concentration of Lactobacillus was greater (p<0.05) in the RGB treatments groups than that in the basal treatment group, whereas no significant differences were observed among the RGB treatment groups (Table 7). The concentrations of Salmonella and E. coli in the ileum were not affected by inclusion of RGB in the diets.
The results of this study indicated that dietary supplementation of RGB improves laying performance and decreases serum cholesterol levels. The results also showed that RGB may be utilized as an immunostimulant for laying hens. Therefore, RGB can be considered as a potential functional ingredient to improve egg production and immune response of laying hens.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was carried out with the support of the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project title: Development of technical skills to improve older laying hens meat quality for export invigoration, Project No. PJ008409)”, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Table 1
Analyzed composition of red ginseng by-product
Items Red ginseng by-product1
Dry matter (g/kg) 966.8
Crude fat (g/kg) 12.0
Crude fiber (g/kg) 153.6
Crude protein (g/kg) 142.5
Crude ash (g/kg) 29.5
Total saponin (mg/g) 0.62

1 Nutrient composition was analyzed in duplicate for dry matter (AOAC, 1990; method 934.01), crude fat (AOAC, 1990; method 920.39), crude fiber (AOAC, 1990; method 978.10), crude protein (AOAC 1990; method 988.05).

Table 2
Composition and nutrient content of experimental diets
Items RGB 0.0 RGB 5.0 RGB 10.0
Ingredients (g/kg)
 Corn 411.5 406.5 401.5
 Wheat 150.0 150.0 150.0
 Soybean meal 250.0 250.0 250.0
 DDGS 50.0 50.0 50.0
 Canola meal 20.0 20.0 20.0
 Tallow 5.0 5.0 5.0
 Molasses 5.0 5.0 5.0
 Dicalcium phosphate 7.0 7.0 7.0
 Limestone 97.0 97.0 97.0
 Sodium chloride 2.0 2.0 2.0
 Red ginseng by-product - 5.0 10.0
 Vitamin premix1 1.5 1.5 1.5
 Mineral premix2 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Total 1,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0
Energy and nutrient content3
 MEn (MJ/kg) 11.4 11.4 11.4
 Crude protein (g/kg) 142.0 142.0 142.0
 Calcium (g/kg) 45.0 45.0 45.0
 Available P (g/kg) 3.3 3.3 3.3
 Lysine (g/kg) 7.5 7.5 7.5
 Methionine (g/kg) 3.6 3.6 3.6

RGB, red ginseng by-product; DDGS, distillers dried grains with soluble; MEn, nitrogen-corrected metabolizable energy.

1 Provided per kilogram of the complete diet: vitamin A (vitamin A acetate), 12,500 IU; vitamin D3, 2,500 IU; vitamin E (DL-α-tocopheryl acetate), 20 IU; vitamin K3, 2 mg; vitamin B1, 2 mg; vitamin B2, 5 mg; vitamin B6, 3 mg; vitamin B12, 18 μg; calcium pantothenate, 8 mg; folic acid, 1 mg; biotin, 50 μg; niacin, 24 mg.

2 Provided per kilogram of complete diet: Fe (FeSO4·7H2O), 40 mg; Cu (CuSO4·H2O), 8 mg; Zn (ZnSO4·H2O), 60 mg; Mn (MnSO4·H2O) 90 mg; Mg (MgO) as 1,500 mg.

3 Nutrient contents in all diet were calculated.

Table 3
Laying performance of layers fed the diet containing red ginseng by-product1
Items Dietary treatment2 SEM p-value

RGB 0.0 RGB 5.0 RGB 10.0
Hen-day egg production (%) 75.9b 82.1a 82.6a 0.30 0.04
Feed intake (g/d/hen) 150.3 151.8 156.6 1.69 0.82
Egg weight (g) 64.4 63.7 66.1 0.32 0.59
Feed conversion ratio (g/g) 3.07 3.03 3.01 0.04 0.49

RGB, red ginseng by-product; SEM, pooled standard error of means.

1 Data are least squares means of 4 observations per treatments.

2 Basal diet was supplemented at the level of red ginseng by-product 5.0 or 10.0 g/kg to the diets, respectively.

a,b Values with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).

Table 4
Eggshell quality of layers fed the diet containing red ginseng by-product (RGB)1
Items Dietary treatment2 SEM p-value

RGB 0.0 RGB 5.0 RGB 10.0
Eggshell strength (kg/cm2) 3.40 3.30 3.40 0.11 0.25
Eggshell thickness (μm) 351.0 352.0 360.9 4.35 0.45
Egg yolk color 8.0 8.8 8.6 0.10 0.68
Haugh unit 83.5 83.8 82.9 0.84 0.50

SEM, pooled standard error of means.

1 Data are least squares means of 4 observations per treatments.

2 Basal diet was supplemented at the level of red ginseng by-product 5.0 or 10.0 g/kg to the diets, respectively.

Table 5
Blood biochemical parameters of layers fed the diet containing red ginseng by-product (RGB)1
Items Dietary treatment2 SEM p-value

RGB 0.0 RGB 5.0 RGB 10.0
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 251.3a 238.7b 235.1b 1.35 0.04
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 266.7 265.1 258.5 1.02 0.19
AST (U/L) 141.7 142.5 140.8 0.59 0.31
ALT (U/L) 14.7 14.7 14.1 0.39 0.28

SEM, pooled standard error of means.

1 Data are least squares means of 4 observations per treatments.

2 Basal diet was supplemented at the level of red ginseng by-product 5.0 or 10.0 g/kg to the diets, respectively.

a,b Values with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).

Table 6
Serum immunoglobulin (Ig) of layers fed the diets containing red ginseng by-product (RGB)1
Items Dietary treatment2 SEM p-value

RGB 0.0 RGB 5.0 RGB 10.0
IgM (μg/mL) 173.75b 190.28a 192.13a 10.25 0.41
IgG (μg/mL) 78.34b 100.16a 101.17a 8.13 0.32

SEM, pooled standard error of means.

1 Data are least squares means of 4 observations per treatments.

2 Basal diet was supplemented at the level of red ginseng by-product 5.0 or 10.0 g/kg to the diets, respectively.

a,b Values with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).

Table 7
Intestinal microflora of layers fed the diets containing red ginseng by-product (RGB)1
Items Dietary treatment2 SEM p-value

RGB 0.0 RGB 5.0 RGB 10.0
———log 10 cfu/g———
Lactobacillus 5.17b 5.49a 5.63a 0.13 0.04
Salmonella 4.66 4.55 4.56 0.45 0.56
Escherichia coli 4.23 4.25 4.30 0.35 0.19

SEM, pooled standard error of means.

1 Data are least squares means of 4 observations per treatments.

2 Basal diet was supplemented at the level of red ginseng by-product 5.0 or 10.0 g/kg to the diets, respectively.

a,b Values with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).

REFERENCES

AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ednAssociation of Official Analytical Chemists; Aarlington, VA, USA:

Ao X, Zhou TX, Kim HJ, Hong SM, Kim IH. 2011. Influence of fermented red ginseng extract on broilers and laying hens. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 24:993–1000.
crossref pdf
Cheung SCM, Szeto YT, Benzie IFF. 2007. Antioxidant protection of edible oils. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 62:39–42.
crossref pmid
Eisen EJ, Bohren BB, McKean HE. 1965. The haugh unit as a measure of egg albumen quality. Poult Sci 41:1461–1468.
crossref
Ernst E. 2010. Panax ginseng: An overview of the clinical evidence. J Ginseng Res 34:259–263.
crossref
Gillis C. 1997Panax ginseng pharmacology: A nitric oxide link? Biochem Pharmacol 54:1–8.
crossref pmid
Han K, Shin IC, Choi KJ, Yun YP, Hong JT, Oh KW. 2005. Korea red ginseng water extract increases nitric oxide concentrations in exhaled breath. Nitric Oxide 12:159–162.
crossref pmid
Hu YJ, Lin YC, Zhou GL, Yu DQ. 2003. Effect of Chinese extracts on performance and T lymphocyte cell subset of yellow broilers. China Poult 12:14–17.

Jang HD, Kim HJ, Cho JH, Chen YJ, Yoo JS, Min BJ, Park JC, Kim IH. 2007. Effect of dietary supplementation of fermented wild-ginseng culture byproducts on egg productivity, egg quality, blood characteristics and ginsenoside concentration of yolk in laying hen. Korean J Poult Sci 34:271–278.
crossref
Jenkins KJ, Atwal AS. 1994. Effects of dietary saponins on fecal bile acids and neutral sterols, and availability of vitamins A and E in the chick. J Nutr Biochem 5:134–137.
crossref
Jin Y, Kotakadi VS, Ying L, Hofseth AB, Cui X, Wood PA, Windust A, Matesic LE, Pena EA, Chiuzan C, Singh NP, Nagarkatti M, Naharkatti PS, Wargovich MJ, Hofseth LJ. 2008. American ginseng suppresses inflammation and DNA damage associated with mouse colitis. Carcinogenesis 29:2351–2359.
crossref pmid pmc
Kang KS, Yokozawa T, Yambe N, Kim HY, Park JH. 2007. ESR study on the structure and hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity relationships of ginsenosides isolate from Panax Ginseng C. A. Meyer. Biol Pharm Bull 30:917–921.
crossref pmid
Kiefer D, Pantuso T. 2003. Panax ginseng. Am Fam Physician 68:1539–1542.
pmid
Kim CS, Park JB, Kim KJ, Chang SJ, Ryoo SW, Jeon BH. 2002. Effect of Korea red ginseng on cerebral blood flow and superoxide production. Acta Pharmacol Sin 23:1152–1156.
pmid
Kim DC, In MJ. 2010. Production of hydrolyzed red ginseng residue and its application to lactic acid bacteria cultivation. J Ginseng Res 34:321–326.
crossref
Kim H, Oh I, Park KH, Kim NM, Do JH, Cho Y. 2009. Stimulatory effect of dietary red ginseng on epidermal hydration and ceramide levels in ultraviolet-irradiated hairless mice. J Med Food 12:746–754.
crossref pmid
Kim YJ, Lee GD, Choi IH. 2015. Effects of dietary red ginseng marc on egg production, egg quality and blood characteristics of laying hens. J Appl Anim Res 43:242–246.
crossref
Lee JH, Cho SH. 2011. Korean red ginseng extract ameliorates skin lesions in NC/N ga mice: an atopic dermatitis model. J Ethnopharmacol 133:810–817.
crossref pmid
Muwalla MM, Abuirmeileh NM. 1990. Suppression of avian hepatic cholesterogenesis by dietary ginseng. J Nutr Biochem 1:518–521.
crossref pmid
NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev ednNational Academy Press; Washington, DC, USA:

Oakenfull DG, Sidhu GS. 1990. Could saponins be a useful treatment for hypercholesterolaemia? Eur J Clin Nutr 44:79–88.

Park EK, Choo MK, Han MJ, Kim DH. 2004. Ginsenoside Rh 1 possesses antiallergic and anti-inflammatory activities. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 133:113–120.
crossref pmid
Qureshi AA, Din ZZ, Abuirmeleh N, Burger WC, Ahmad Y, Elson CE. 1983. Suppression of avian hepatic lipid metabolism by solvent extracts of garlic: Impact on serum lipids. J Nutr 113:1746–1755.
crossref pmid
Rao AV, Gurfinkel DM. 2000. The bioactivity of saponins: Triterpenoid and steroidal glycosides. Durg Metabol Drug Interact 17:211–235.
crossref
Rivera E, Hu S, Concha C. 2003. Ginseng and aluminum hydroxide act synergistically as vaccine adjuvants. Vaccine 21:1149–1157.
crossref pmid
Shin HR, Kim JY, Yun TK, Morgan G, Vainio H. 2000. The cancer-preventive potential of Panax ginseng: A review of human and experimental evidence. Cancer Causes Control 11:565–576.
crossref pmid
Sumiyoshi M, Sakanaka M, Kimura Y. 2010. Effects of red ginseng extract on allergic reactions to food in balb/c mice. J Ethnopharmacol 132:206–212.
crossref pmid
Sung WS, Lee DG. 2008. The combination effect of Korean Red Ginseng Saponins with Kanamycin and Cefotaxime against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Biol Pharm Bull 31:1614–1617.
crossref pmid
Szeto YT, Wong JWM, Wong SCY, Park SC, Benzie IFF. 2011. DNA protective effect of ginseng and the antagonistic effect of Chinese turnip: A preliminary study. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 66:97–100.
crossref pmid
Thomas DV, Molan AL, Ravindran AV. 2010. The ability of green tea to positively modify the gut microflora in broiler chickens. Aust Poult Sci Symp 21:203–206.

Wee JJ, Park MK, Chung AS. 2011. Biological activities of ginseng and its application to human health. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. Benzie IFF, Wachel-Galor S, editorsCRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: p. 157–174.
crossref


ABOUT
SPECIALTIES
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS
Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul
08776, Korea   TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : jongkha@hotmail.com               

Copyright © 2019 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next