Go to Top Go to Bottom
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci > Volume 29(5); 2016 > Article
Zhang, Jing, Jia, Qiao, Liu, Liang, and Liu: mRNA Expression of Ovine Angiopoietin-like Protein 4 Gene in Adipose Tissues

Abstract

Angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4) is involved in a variety of functions, including lipoprotein metabolism and angiogenesis. To reveal the role of ANGPTL4 in fat metabolism of sheep, ovine ANGPTL4 mRNA expression was analyzed in seven adipose tissues from two breeds with distinct tail types. Forty-eight animals with the gender ratio of 1:1 for both Guangling Large Tailed (GLT) and Small Tailed Han (STH) sheep were slaughtered at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months of age, respectively. Adipose tissues were collected from greater and lesser omental, subcutaneous, retroperitoneal, perirenal, mesenteric, and tail fats. Ontogenetic mRNA expression of ANGPTL4 in these adipose tissues from GTL and STH was studied by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction. The results showed that ANGPTL4 mRNA expressed in all adipose tissues studied with the highest in subcutaneous and the lowest in mesenteric fat depots. Months of age, tissue and breed are the main factors that significantly influence the mRNA expression. These results provide new insights into ovine ANGPTL4 gene expression and clues for its function mechanism.

INTRODUCTION

ANGPTL4, also known as a fasting-induced adipose factor, which is up-regulated by fasting, is one of the seven members of angiopoietin-like proteins (ANGPTLs). It is involved in angiogenesis and encoded by ANGPTL4 gene. It is secreted by a variety of tissues, mainly by liver and white adipose tissues (WAT), and exists in either native (full-length) form with molecular mass of ~50 kDa (Mandard et al., 2006) or truncated forms both in human and mouse plasma (Mandard et al., 2004; Zhu et al., 2012). Different forms can result from complex processing, including cleavage, glycosylation and oligomerization of the ANGPTL4 protein, which may be inherent to the cell line/type and species (Grootaert et al., 2012). In mice, the native form was physically associated with high density lipoprotein, whereas truncated form was associated with low density lipoprotein. In human both native and truncated forms were associated with high density lipoprotein. The truncated ANGPTL4 was found to be associated with adipocyte differentiation in mice, however, only the native form was detected in adipose tissues in human (Mandard et al., 2004).
ANGPTL4 has been identified as a multifunctional signal protein. Nevertheless, growing evidence indicates that ANGPTL4 mediates the physiological fluctuations of the activity of lipoprotein lipase (LPL), an enzyme responsible for the conversion of triglycerides to monoglycerides and fatty acids from circulating lipoproteins (Dijk and Kersten., 2014). ANGPTL4 can inhibit the activity of LPL (Georgiadi et al., 2012) by disrupting enzyme dimerization to limit extracellular lipolysis. Therefore, higher ANGPTL4 expression results in elevated triglyceride (TG) in plasma (Kadomatsu et al., 2011) and thus can induce obesity, insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia etc. Besides inhibiting LPL, ANGPTL4 also potentiates the actions of catecholamines and glucocorticoids by promoting their effects on cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) dependent TG hydrolysis in mice under short and long term fasting, respectively (Gray et al., 2012). The cAMP dependent TG hydrolysis is characterized by transcriptional effects on many genes, including those encoding adipose triglyceride lipase, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha, uncoupling protein-1 (UCP-1), 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase, diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase homolog 2, hormone sensitive lipase, perilipin, comparative gene identification-58, and ANGPTL4 itself (Mandard et al., 2006; Gray et al., 2012). ANGPTL4 can promote the intracellular lipolysis by increasing the expression of WAT genes involved in TG hydrolysis (Mandard et al., 2006). As a result, ANGPTL4 may regulate both extra- and intracellular lipolysis (Gray et al., 2012).
ANGPTL4 mRNA is expressed in many organs and tissues, highly in WAT, placenta, liver, muscle (Feingold et al., 2012), pancreas and lung, kidney (Ge et al., 2005) in mice and humans, and slightly in brain, heart and hypophysis in humans (Klopper et al., 2008; Lu et al., 2010). High expression of bovine ANGPTL4 was found in adipose tissues and liver. Its expression was also detected in gastrointestinal tract (Mamedova et al., 2010), heart, kidney, hypophysis and skeletal muscle (Mamedova et al., 2010) of cattle. However, no study on expression of ovine ANGPTL4 gene has been reported.
Sheep tails fall into three types: long and short fat-tailed, and lean-tailed. There are significant differences in fat deposition in each type. Our early studies showed that mRNAs of UCP1 (Yuan et al., 2012), leptin (Lep) and its receptor (LEPR) genes (Liu et al., 2013) expressed differentially and spatiotemporally in two breeds with distinct tail types: Guangling Large Tailed (GLT) and Small Tailed Han (STH) sheep. In view of structure differences between species and the essential role in fat metabolism of ANGPTL4 gene, study on the cDNA sequence and expression of ovine ANGPTL4 gene may help us to understand the genetic mechanism of fat metabolism in different sheep breeds. The purpose of this study was to detect the mRNA expression in adipose tissues in the two breeds of GLT and STH based on the full coding sequence of ovine ANGPTL4 submitted to NCBI (GenBank accession number: KF8736131.1) by our research team.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue sample preparation

Adipose tissues were collected from GLT (Datong, Shanxi, China) and STH (Jining, Shandong, China) after slaughtered at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 months of age, respectively, with four males and four females at each time point for both breeds. The tissues included great and small omental, subcutaneous, retroperitoneal, perirenal, mesenteric and tail fats. All samples were collected within 45 min postmortem, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently stored at −80°C until analysis. The feeding, management and slaughtering were conducted according to the National (GB 13078–2001 and GB/T 17237–1998) and the Agricultural Standards (NY 5148-2002-NY 5151-2002) of the People’s Republic of China. For details and the breed differences see Yuan (2012).

Total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA from each sample was extracted via Trizol Reagent kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the instruction of the manufacturer and detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The ratio of the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (A260/280) was used to assess the purity of nucleic acids (for pure RNA A260/280 is 1.8~2.0).
A Prime Script RT reagent kit (Takara Bio Inc, Takara code: DRR036A, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) was used to synthesize single-stranded cDNA from total RNA. The RT reaction was performed in 10 μL of reaction mixture with 0.5 μg total RNA. Reverse transcription was performed on a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA) by using the following protocol: 37°C for 15 min, and terminated by heating at 85°C for 5 s and cooling at 4°C.

Primer design

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR)

Primers were designed to span an exon-exon boundary based on the coding sequence of ovine ANGPTL4 gene. Ribosomal protein L 13 (RPL13) gene was chosen as house-keeping gene whose primers were designed based on ovine RPL13. All primers were designed by primer 3 plus (http://www.Biowebdb.org/primer3plus/). Primer sequence, PCR product size and annealing temperature are listed in Table 1.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Relative ANGPTL4 expression was quantified by using the 2−ΔΔCt method with an ABI Prism 7500 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems) and SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM kit (Takara, Japan), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The qRT-PCR procedure was 45 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 34 s. Dissociation curves were obtained with following procedures: 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 1 min, then warming up from 60°C to 95°C slowly at the speed of 0.5°C/10 s. All samples and controls were run in tripartite, and the average of tripartite threshold cycle (Ct) values was used in statistical analyses. The Ct values for all samples were normalized against that of RPL13 (Gebhardt et al., 2010).

Statistical analysis

General linear model was fitted and univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted by SPSS17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to analyze factors influencing the mRNA expression. Breed, gender, tissue and age were included in the following model as the main factors:
yijklm=μ+Bi+Gj+Tk+Ml+BGij+BTik+BMil+GTjk+GMjl+TMkl+eijklm
where, yijklm is the mRNA abundance; μ the overall mean; Bi the ith breed effect (i = 1, 2); Gj the jth gender effect (j = 1, 2); Tk the kth tissue effect (k = 1, 2, …, 7); Ml the lth months of age effect (l = 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12); BGij, BTik, BMil, GTjk, GMjl, and TMkl the relevant two-way interactions; eijklm the random residue. Data expressed as + G. Multiple comparisons among levels within factors were performed using the Duncan’s method.
To characterize the temporal expression features of ANGPTL4 mRNA in the two breeds under study, the relative expressions in each and whole adipose tissue were also analyzed by fitting time-series models and conducted by Minitab 16 (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA). For clarifying the possible spatial expression features, Pearson correlation coefficients between expressions in seven depots were computed by using SPSS 17.0 software package.

RESULTS

Factors influencing ovine ANGPTL4 mRNA expression

ANOVA results showed that breed (p<0.001), month of age (p<0.001) and tissue (p<0.001) were the main effects influencing the ANGPTL4 mRNA expression (Table 2). No significant effect was found for gender. Interaction between breed and month of age had highly significant (p<0.001) effect on the mRNA expression. Significant interactions (p<0.05) were also found for breed×tissue and gender×tissue (Table 2).

Differential mRNA expression within the main factors

Table 3 gives the abundance of ANGPTL4 mRNA within the main factors. Abundance in GLT (4.566) was significantly higher than that in STH (1.753) suggesting that breed difference existed in the mRNA expression. Though there was no significant difference, slightly higher expression in females (3.229) than in males (3.077) was observed.
The highest mRNA expression was in subcutaneous (4.209) and tail (4.003) fats and the lowest expression in mesenteric fat (1.156) with significant differences (p<0.05) from those found in other adipose tissues. Moderate mRNA expression was found in great (2.457) and small omental (3.217), retroperitoneal (3.576) and perirenal (3.499) fats. These results suggested that the ovine ANGPTL4 gene expressed more in shallow than in deep fat depots.
The mRNA expression increased with month of age and reached the maximum at 10 months (4.797), and then decreased slightly at 12 months. Abundance at 10 months was significantly different from those at other five age points, among which there was no significant difference.

Differential mRNA expression between the main factors

Besides the overall higher mRNA expressions in GLT than in STH, the expression trend in GLT was basically consistent with the general trend for main factor of months of age except slightly lower expression at eight months. However, higher mRNA expressions at 2 and 12 months were found in STH (Figure 1A). The differences resulted in the significant interaction (p<0.001) between breed and month of age.
The significant interaction between gender and tissue (p<0.05) can be attributed to the higher mRNA expression in retroperitoneal and lower expressions in perirenal and tail fats in males than females (Figure 1B).
Due to the higher mRNA expression in retroperitoneal and lower expression in perirenal fats in STH than GLT (Figure 1C), significant breed by tissue interaction was observed.

The temporal expression features

Figure 2 lists the observed and predicted relative expressions of ANGPTL4 mRNA in adipose tissues of Small Tailed Han sheep. In all the adipose tissues as a whole, the mRNA expressions from four to eight months of age were lower than that during ten to two months of age. As a result, the mRNA expressed as an inverted parabolic curve for both the observed and predicted (Figure 2A). Similar quadratic curves were fitted to the expressions in small omental (Figure 2C), retroperitoneal (Figure 2D), mesenteric (Figure 2F) and tail fat (Figure 2G). Different from these expression patterns, an approximately linear decrease function for expression in great omental (Figure 2B) and linear increase functions in perirenal (Figure 2E) and subcutaneous fat (Figure 2H) were fitted. These results suggested that the mRNA expressed temporally and spatially in adipose tissues of STH in different manner, although the goodness of fit was not high.
Figure 3 gives the observed and predicted relative expressions of ANGPTL4 mRNA in adipose tissues of Guangling Large Tailed sheep. As a whole, the mRNA expression increased from two month of age, reached the highest at 10 and then decreased rapidly at 12 month of age. Opposite to the trend in STH, the mRNA expressed as a parabolic curve for both the observed and predicted (Figure 3A). Similar linear increase functions were fitted to the expressions in great (Figure 3B) and small omental (Figure 3C), mesenteric (Figure 3F), and subcutaneous (Figure 3H) adipose tissues. Quadratic expressions were found in retroperitoneal (Figure 3D), perirenal (Figure 3E) and tail fat (Figure 3G). These results also revealed the tempospatial differences in mRNA expression in GLT.
Significant breed differences can be reflected by comparing Figure 2 with Figure 3. Opposite expression trends between breeds were found in great omental (linear decrease in STH vs linear increase in GLT), retroperitoneal (inverted parabolic expression in STH vs parabolic expression in GLT) and tail fat (nonlinear increase in STH vs nonlinear decrease in GLT). Similar trends but in a different manner were found in small omental and mesenteric (nonlinear increase in STH vs linear increase in GLT), and perirenal (linear increase in STH vs nonlinear increase in GLT) adipose tissues. Though linear increase functions were fitted for expression in subcutaneous fat from both breeds, the observed expression increased in STH from 10 to 12 months of age, but decreased in GLT. Furthermore, no matter which tissue and what manner, ANGPTL4 mRNA expressed increasingly from 10 to 12 months of age in STH, but decreasingly in GLT.

The spatial expression features

Table 4 presents the correlations among ANGPTL4 mRNA abundances in seven adipose tissues under study, aiming to examine the possible spatial expression associations. Generally, more strong positive correlations were found in GLT than that in STH. Specifically, in GLT, the expression in tail fat correlated with that in great omental (0.421), perirenal (0.469) and mesenteric (0.403) adipose tissues at highly significant level (p<0.01), respectively. Significant correlations were also found between expression in subcutaneous fat and that in great omental (0.520, p<0.01) and in retroperitoneal (0.395, p<0.05) fats. These results suggested that there seemed to be some kind of connection between the mRNA expressions in shallow and deep depots. Only one significant correlation was obtained between expressions in deep depots (0.438, between expressions in retroperitoneal and small omental adipose tissues).
In STH, the mRNA expression in tail fat significantly correlated with that in small omental (0.437, p<0.01) and that in subcutaneous (0.310, p<0.05) adipose tissues, respectively. No significant correlation was found between deep depots for both breeds.

DISCUSSION

Expression of ANGPTL4 mRNA

Early studies on the mRNA expression of ANGPTL4 in both humans (Klopper et al., 2008) and rodents (Ge et al., 2005) suggested that the mRNA was highly expressed in adipose tissues and liver. In cattle, ANGPTL4 mRNA abundance was also found substantially higher in adipose than in other tissues (Mamedova et al., 2010). For adipose tissue itself, the mRNA expression varied in different fat depots. In human, the ANGPTL4 expressed in visceral (omental) and had no expression in subcutaneous and breast (mammary) adipose tissues by immunohistochemical staining (Gentil et al., 2006). In mice, Dutton and Trayhurn (2008) found that both the mRNA and protein expressed in five adipose tissues, with expression in subcutaneous non-significantly lower than that in epididymal and perirenal depots. In this study, we detected mRNA expression signals in all seven tested adipose tissues, with the highest in subcutaneous followed by tail fat and the least in mesenteric adipose tissue. Our results indicated that ovine ANGPTL4 expressed higher in shallow than in visceral adipose depots, which seems to be opposite to the results obtained in both humans and mice. This divergence may due to species difference, and more possibly to the directionally artificial selection for meat purpose in sheep.
Breed difference exists in ovine ANGPTL4 mRNA expression with higher expression in GLT than in STH. GLT, one type of long fat-tailed breed, has high meat quality, strong ability of lipid accumulation and weak fertility. STH, one type of short fat-tailed breed, however, has high fertility with precocious trait but weak lipid accumulation (Yuan et al., 2012). ANGPTL4 can cause accumulation of TG by inhibiting activity of LPL, and thus leads to strong ability of lipid accumulation in GLT. Our result was supported by the findings that ANGPTL4 expression in adipose tissue from obese pig breeds was significantly higher than that from lean pig breeds (Feng et al., 2006).
Nutritional condition and seasonal temperatures can affect the expression of ANGPTL4 mRNA. In this study, ages at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months corresponds to Jan, Mar, May, Jul, Sep and Nov, respectively. Two flocks were raised indoors before weaning and during dry seasons in winter and spring seasons from Dec to May, and by grazing on pasture in grass seasons from Jun to Nov (Yuan et al., 2012). The highest and lowest mRNA expressions in adipose tissues were detected in Sep and Jan, respectively. This differential expression depends on the supply of feed and accumulation of fat. When sufficient feed is supplied and animals have good body condition in grass seasons, especially for animals at 10 months of age, the mRNA expressed at higher levels than that in dry seasons. This result was supported by studies, e.g. in mice. Camenisch (2002) reported that the expression level of ANGPTL4 rose clearly when mice had high fat diet.
In view of the complex factors, especially the age effect may be confused by season effect in naturally managed sheep flock. Though time-series analysis was used intensively in gene expression studies, most for microarray gene expression data, the experimental subjects were well-controlled rather than natural, e.g. Wong et al. (2015) and Yang et al. (2012). Moreover, model fitting considered the influence of time on the ANGPTL4 mRNA expression only, ignoring the influence of other factors on the gene expression. So the results by time-series analysis are not quite consistent with those obtained by qRT-PCR. This seems to suggest that time-series gene expression analysis is more suitable for the well-controlled experimental design.
More strong positive correlations between ANGPTL4 mRNA expressions in shallow and in deep adipose tissues were found in GLT than that in STH by spatial correlation analysis. These results further indicated the breed differences. However, why there was no significant association between deep depots for both breeds is difficult to understand and deserves further study.

CONCLUSION

Ontogenetic mRNA expression of ANGPTL4 in seven adipose tissues from two different sheep breeds was studied by quantitative real time PCR and analyzed by ANOVA and time series analysis. The ANGPTL4 mRNA expresses spatiotemporally and differentially in adipose tissues of both breeds. Breed, month of age and adipose tissues from different depots influence the mRNA expression significantly. The season effect on the mRNA expression can to a certain degree confuse the age effect for naturally managed sheep flocks.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the staff in the Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Shanxi Agricultural University for providing the research laboratories. We thank the guidance of Li Baojun in manuscript preparation. This work was supported by the project of the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (No. 30972084), the project of Young Academic Leaders of Shanxi Agricultural University (No. XD201205), and the Key Scientific and Technological Projects of Shanxi Province (011029).

Figure 1
Effects of two-way interactions on the mRNA expression of ovine ANGPTL4 gene. (A) Breed×months of age, (B) Gender×tissue, (C) Breed×tissue. Breed: STH, Small Tailed Han sheep; GLT, Guangling Large Tailed sheep. Tissue: 1, great omental (GO); 2, small omental (SO); 3, subcutaneous (SC); 4, retroperitoneal (RP); 5, perirenal (PR); 6, mesenteric (MT); 7, Tail (TA).
ajas-29-5-615f1.gif
Figure 2
Observed (solid line) and predicted (dashed line) relative expressions of angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4) mRNA in adipose tissues of Small Tailed Han sheep. (A) whole adipose tissues, (B) great omental, (C) small omental, (D) retroperitoneal, (E) perirenal, (F) mesenteric, (G) tail fat, (H) subcutaneous.
ajas-29-5-615f2.gif
Figure 3
Observed (solid line) and predicted (dashed line) relative expressions of angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4) mRNA in adipose tissues of Guangling Large Tailed sheep. (A) whole adipose tissues, (B) great omental, (C) small omental, (D) retroperitoneal, (E) perirenal, (F) mesenteric, (G) tail fat, (H) subcutaneous.
ajas-29-5-615f3.gif
Table 1
Primers used in qRT-PCR
Gene Primer sequence Length (bp) Annealing temperature (°C) Usage
ANGPTL4 QForward: ATTCCCCACCTTTCCTGGTT
QReverse: TCCGAAGCCATCTTTGTAGG
124 60 mRNA expression
RPL13 QForward: CTCAAGGTTGTGCGTCTGAA
QReverse: TTTCCGGTAGTGGATCTTGG
141 60

qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; ANGPTL4, angiopoietin-like protein 4; RPL13, ribosomal protein L 13.

Table 2
Analysis of variance for the mRNA abundance of ovine ANGPTL4
Source of variation Sum of squares Degree of freedom F-value Significance
Model 3,355.259 65 6.292 ***
Intercept 5,368.531 1 654.182 ***
Breed 797.801 1 97.216 ***
Gender 2.916 1 0.355 NS
Month of age (MOA) 408.555 5 9.957 ***
Tissue 512.817 6 10.415 ***
Breed×MOA 491.842 5 11.987 ***
Gender×MOA 74.654 4 2.274 NS
Tissue×MOA 301.241 30 1.224 NS
Breed×gender 1.471 1 0.179 NS
Breed×tissue 113.715 6 2.309 *
Gender×tissue 106.109 6 2.155 *
Error 4,390.469 535
Total 13,740.535 601
Corrected total 7,746.728 600

ANGPTL4, angiopoietin-like protein 4; NS, not significant.

* p<0.05,

** p<0.01,

*** p<0.001.

Table 3
Abundance of ovine ANGPTL4 mRNA within the main factors
Factor Level Abundance of mRNA* Factor Level Abundance of mRNA*
Breed Small Tailed Han (STH) 1.753±0.166b Gender Male 3.077±0.169a
Guangling Large Tailed (GLT) 4.566±0.170a Female 3.229±0.167a
Adipose tissue Great omental fat (GO) 2.457±0.311b Month of age 2 2.402±0.263b
Small omental fat (SO)) 3.217±0.311b 4 2.549±0.281b
Subcutaneous fat (SC) 4.209±0.311a 6 2.911±0.273b
Retroperitoneal fat (RP) 3.576±0.313b 8 3.088±0.272b
Perirenal fat (PR) 3.499±0.311b 10 4.797±0.273a
Mesenteric fat (MT) 1.156±0.311bc 12 3.260±0.469b
Tail fat (TA) 4.003±0.311a

ANGPTL4, angiopoietin-like protein 4.

* Values with different superscripts within the same factor differ significantly (p<0.05).

Table 4
Spatial correlation between expressions of adipose tissues in STH (upper triangle) and GLT (lower triangle)
ANGPTL4 mRNA abundance

GO SO RE PE ME TA SU
GO −0.085 0.259 0.096 −0.143 −0.161 −0.007
SO 0.201 0.070 0.129 0.204 0.437** 0.008
RE 0.140 0.438** −0.259 0.149 0.024 0.181
PE 0.251 −0.090 0.014 0.282 0.232 0.140
ME 0.299 0.086 −0.050 0.134 0.025 −0.122
TA 0.421** −0.100 −0.024 0.469** 0.403** 0.310*
SU 0.520** 0.261 0.395* −0.015 0.245 0.131

STH, Small Tailed Han; GLT, Guangling Large Tailed; ANGPTL4, angiopoietin-like protein 4; GO, great omental; SO, small omental; RE, retroperitoneal; PE, perirenal; ME, mesenterium; TA, tail fat; SU, subcutaneous.

** p<0.01,

* p<0.05.

REFERENCES

Camenisch G, Pisabarro MT, Sherman D, Kowalski J, Nagel M, Hass P, Xie MH, Gurney A, Bodary S, Liang XH, Clark K, Beresini M, Ferrara N, Gerber HP. 2002. ANGPTL3 stimulates endothelial cell adhesion and migration via integrin avβ3 and induces blood veddel formation in vivo. J Biol Chem 277:17281–17290.
crossref pmid
Dijk W, Kersten S. 2014. Regulation of lipoprotein lipase by Angptl4. Trends Endocrinol Metab 25:146–155.
crossref pmid
Dutton S, Trayhurn P. 2008. Regulation of angiopoietin-like protein 4/fasting-induced adipose factor (Angptl4/FIAF) expression in mouse white adipose tissue and 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Br J Nutr 100:18–26.
crossref pmid
Feng SQ, Chen XD, Xia T, Gan L, Qiu H, Dai MH, Zhou L, Peng Y, Yang ZQ. 2006. Cloning, chromosome mapping and expression characteristics of porcine ANGPTL3 and −4. Cytogenet Genome Res 114:44–49.
crossref pmid
Feingold KR, Shigenaga JK, Cross AS, Moser A, Grunfeld C. 2012. Angiopoietin like protein 4 expression is decreased in activated macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 421:612–615.
crossref pmid
Ge H, Cha JY, Gopal H, Harp C, Yu X, Repa JJ, Li C. 2005. Differential regulation and properties of angiopoietin-like proteins 3 and 4. J Lipid Res 46:1484–1490.
crossref pmid
Gebhardt FM, Scott HA, Dodd PR. 2010. Housekeepers for accurate transcript expression analysis in Alzheimer’s disease autopsy brain tissue. Alzheimers Dement 6:465–474.
crossref pmid
Gentil C, Le Jan S, Philippe J, Leibowith J, Sonigo P, Germain S, Piétri-Rouxel F. 2006. Is oxygen a key factor in the lipodystrophy phenotype? Lipids Health Dis 5:27
crossref pmid pmc
Georgiadi A, Kersten S. 2012. Mechanisms of gene regulation by fatty acids. Adv Nutr 3:127–134.
crossref pmid pmc
Gray NE, Lam LN, Yang K, Zhou AY, Koliwad S, Wang JC. 2012. Angiopoietin-like 4 (Angptl4) protein is a physiological mediator of intracellular lipolysis in murine adipocytes. J Biol Chem 287:8444–8456.
crossref pmid pmc
Grootaert C, Van de Wiele T, Verstraete W, Bracke M, Vanhoecke B. 2012. Angiopoietin-like protein 4: health effects, modulating agents and structure-function relationships. Expert Rev Proteomics 9:181–199.
crossref pmid
Kadomatsu T, Tabata M, Oike Y. 2011. Angiopoietin-like proteins: emerging targets for treatment of obesity and related metabolic diseases. FEBS J 278:559–564.
crossref pmid
Klopper JP, Berenz A, Hays WR, Sharma V, Pugazhenthi U, Janssen J, Singh M, Bissonnette RP, Haugen BR. 2008. In vivo and microarray analysis of rexinoid-responsive anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 14:589–596.
crossref pmid
Liu BF, Zhou SS, Wang JL, Wei LL, Qiao LY, Liu JH, Liang C, Liu WZ. 2013. Differential expression of Lep and LEPR mRNA in adipose tissues of sheep with divergent fat-tails[in Chinese]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica 44:1014–1022.

Lu B, Moser A, Shigenaga JK, Grunfeld C, Feingold KR. 2010. The acute phase response stimulates the expression of angiopoietin like protein 4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 391:1737–1741.
crossref pmid
Mandard S, Zandbergen F, Tan NS, Escher P, Patsouris D, Koenig W, Kleemann R, Bakker A, Veenman F, Wahli W, Müller M, Kersten S. 2004. The direct peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor target fasting-induced adipose factor (FIAF/PGAR/ANGPTL4) is present in blood plasma as a truncated protein that is increased by fenofibrate treatment. J Biol Chem 279:34411–34420.
crossref pmid
Mandard S, Zandbergen F, Van Straten EW, Wahli W, Kuipers F, Müller M, Kersten S. 2006. The fasting-induced adipose factor/angiopoietin-like protein 4 is physically associated with lipoproteins and governs plasma lipid levels and adiposity. J Biol Chem 281:934–944.
crossref pmid
Mamedova LK, Robbins K, Johnson BJ, Bradford BJ. 2010. Tissue expression of angiopoietin-like protein 4 in cattle. J Anim Sci 88:124–130.
crossref pmid
Wong K, Sun F, Trudel G, Sebastiani P, Laneuville O. 2015. Temporal gene expression profiling of the rat knee joint capsule during immobilization-induced joint contractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:125
crossref pmid pmc
Yang Q, Mattick JS, Orman MA, Nguyen TT, Ierapetritou MG, Berthiaume F, Androulakis IP. 2012. Dynamics of hepatic gene expression profile in a rat cecal ligation and puncture model. J Surg Res 176:583–600.
crossref pmid pmc
Yuan YN, Liu WZ, Liu JH, Qiao LY, Wu JL. 2012. Cloning and ontogenetic expression of the uncoupling protein 1 gene UCP1 in sheep. J Appl Genet 53:203–212.
crossref pmid
Zhu P, Goh YY, Chin HF, Kersten S, Tan NS. 2012. Angiopoietin-like 4: A decade of research. Biosci Rep 32:211–219.
crossref pmid


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : jongkha@hotmail.com               

Copyright © 2019 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. All rights reserved.

Close layer
prev next