Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. Search

CLOSE


Asian-Australas J Anim Sci > Volume 28(10); 2015 > Article
Zhang, Wu, Jia, Pan, Li, Lei, Chen, and Lan: Novel Nucleotide Variations, Haplotypes Structure and Associations with Growth Related Traits of Goat AT Motif-Binding Factor (ATBF1) Gene

Abstract

The AT motif-binding factor (ATBF1) not only interacts with protein inhibitor of activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) (PIAS3) to suppress STAT3 signaling regulating embryo early development and cell differentiation, but is required for early activation of the pituitary specific transcription factor 1 (Pit1) gene (also known as POU1F1) critically affecting mammalian growth and development. The goal of this study was to detect novel nucleotide variations and haplotypes structure of the ATBF1 gene, as well as to test their associations with growth-related traits in goats. Herein, a total of seven novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (SNP 1-7) within this gene were found in two well-known Chinese native goat breeds. Haplotypes structure analysis demonstrated that there were four haplotypes in Hainan black goat while seventeen haplotypes in Xinong Saanen dairy goat, and both breeds only shared one haplotype (hap1). Association testing revealed that the SNP2, SNP5, SNP6, and SNP7 loci were also found to significantly associate with growth-related traits in goats, respectively. Moreover, one diplotype in Xinong Saanen dairy goats significantly linked to growth related traits. These preliminary findings not only would extend the spectrum of genetic variations of the goat ATBF1 gene, but also would contribute to implementing marker-assisted selection in genetics and breeding in goats.

INTRODUCTION

As the global economy is rapidly expanding, the demand for goat products is increasing in numerous developed and developing countries, such as China, India and South Africa. However, these goat products are experiencing serious shortage in those countries. Therefore, the question of how to improve goat growth and development has aroused interests in goat selection and breeding (Choudhary et al., 2007). The growth-related traits (e.g. body weight, body length, body height) are controlled by multiple genes, so it is difficult to rapidly improve growth traits using traditional methods. Consequently, an effective DNA marker-assisted selection (MAS) would speed up the development and improvement goat products. Besides, it is more realistic to focus on some important genes and explore their nucleotide variations with growth-related traits. Thereby, identifying, mapping, and analyzing novel nucleotide variations of the candidate genes and detecting their associations with economic traits are required for an effective MAS system.
AT motif-binding factor (ATBF1, also known as Zinc finger homeobox 3 [ZFHX3]) gene was firstly isolated as an AT (adenine and thymine)-binding factor of human α-fetoprotein (AFP) and was mapped in human Chr.16q22.3–q23.1 (Morinaga et al., 1991). Human ATBF1 is found to have two different transcripts: ATBF1-A and ATBF1-B. Function experiments show that ATBF1-A inhibits the enhancer of AFP and induces cell differentiation and death, while ATBF1-B promotes AFP expression by activating its enhancer (Ninomiya et al., 2002; Nojiri et al., 2004; Jung et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2007; Cleton-Jansen et al., 2008; Kai et al., 2008). From the available studies, ATBF1 is responsible for suppressing AFP transcription by binding with its enhancer competing with hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 (HNF-1) (Yasuda et al., 1994), thereby it plays an important role in cell differentiation and death (Ishii et al., 2003; Jung et al., 2011; Perea et al., 2013), tumour genesis (Sun et al., 2012; Sun et al., 2014), atrial fibrillation and embryonic development (Benjamin et al., 2009; Gudbjartsson et al., 2009; Perea et al., 2013). Furthermore, ATBF1 interacts with Smads to regulate thyroid-stimulating hormone beta (TSH-β) signaling pathway (Massagué, 2005; Moustakas et al., 2009; Massagué et al., 2012), thus it represses AFP expression (Sakata et al., 2014). Besides, ATBF1 regulates estrogen receptor signaling, functioning mammary gland (Li et al., 2012) and as well as in progesterone receptors signaling signaling (Li et al., 2013).
To date, ATBF1 is described as the biggest anti-transcription factor for regulating expression of many critical genes, such as signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), pituitary specific transcription factor 1 (Pit1) (also known as POU1F1) and prophet of Pit-1 (PROP1) genes. ATBF1 interacts with protein inhibitor of activated STAT3 (PIAS3) by forming ATBF1-PIAS3 complex and combining with active STAT3, thereby inhibiting expression of proliferative genes by reducing STAT3- DNA binding activity (Nojiri et al., 2004; Nishio et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2014). Importantly, ATBF1 not only activates expression of Pit1 gene though interacting with Pit1 enhancer (Qi et al., 2008), but also potentially synergizes with PROP1 that can bind to the enhancer of Pit1 gene and regulate the expression levels of growth hormone, prolactin, and TSH-β (Carvalho et al., 2006; Davis et al., 2010; Araujo et al., 2013). STAT3, Pit1, and PROP1 genes play an important role in embryo early development and cell differentiation (Zhong et al., 1994; Schindler et al., 1995; Darnell, 1997; Heinrich et al., 1998; Shuai et al., 1999; Kamohara et al., 2000; Fang et al., 2012; Godi et al., 2012; Akcay et al., 2013; Pan et al., 2013; Navardauskaite et al., 2014), so ATBF1 gene was hypothesized to produce important effects on early development and cell differentiation, thus it would affect the grow traits in animals.
To date, few studies about the nucleotide variations of goat ATBF1 gene and its effects on growth traits have been reported. To improve understanding of goat ATBF1 gene, this work firstly explored the novel nucleotide variations, haplotypes structure of goat ATBF1 gene, and analyzed its associations with growth related traits. These findings would not only extend the spectrum of genetic variations of the goat ATBF1 gene, but also would contribute to implementing MAS in genetics and breeding in goats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and data collection

In this study, a total of 707 goats from two well-known Chinese native goat breeds (Hainan Black goats [HNBG] = 284; Xinong Saanen dairy goats [XNSN] n = 423) were used. All selected individuals were healthy and unrelated. The HNBG goats were 2 to 3 years old and reared in native breeding farms, in Zanzhou County, Hainan province, China. All XNSN individuals were 2 to 6 years old, among which 21.3%, 50.8%, 8.9%, 12.7%, and 6.3% were 2 years old, 3 years old, 4 years old, 5 years old, and 6 years old, respectively. The XNSN goats were reared on Chinese native dairy goat breeding farm in Qianyang County, Shaanxi Province, China (Zhao et al., 2013).
Body measurement traits for all selected individuals were measured, including body weight (BW), body height, body length (BL), chest circumference (ChC), chest depth, chest width, hucklebone width (HuW), hip width, and cannon circumference (CaC), according to the method of Gilbert et al. (1993). Consequently, body length index (BLI), chest circumference index (ChCI), cannon circumference index (CaCI), hucklebone width index (HuWI) and trunk index (TI) were also calculated on the basis of our reported description (Fang et al., 2010).

DNA isolation and DNA pool construction

Extraction of DNA samples from ear tissues and blood leukocytes (Sambrock et al., 2001; Green et al., 2012) were diluted to working concentration (50 ng/μL) according to our previous report (Lan et al., 2013). A total of 50 DNA samples from two breeds were randomly selected to construct DNA pools, which were used as templates for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification to explore SNPs of ATBF1 gene.

Primers design and DNA sequencing

The 5′ UTR, exons, introns and 3′ UTR regions of the goat ATBF1 gene were amplified from the constructed DNA pools. Fourteen pairs of primers were designed to amplify the goat ATBF1 gene using Primer Premier Software (version 5.0) based on the sheep ATBF1 gene sequence (GenBank Accession No. NC_019471) as the goat was not available (Table 1). PCR reactions were performed in 25 μL volume containing 50 ng genomic DNA, 0.5 μM of each primer, 1× Buffer (including 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs and 0.625 units of Taq DNA polymerase [MBI, Vilnius, Lithuania]). The Touch-Down PCR protocol was as follows: denatured at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 68°C to 51°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min, finally extended at 72°C for 10 min. Then to sequence accurately, the products were sequenced only when they had a single objective band of each pair of primers.

Genotyping using PCR-based amplification-created restriction site-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-ACRS-RFLP) and PCR-RFLP

The primers were selected to amplify and genotype the variants of goat ATBF1 gene only if mutations were found after DNA pool sequencing and Blastn analyses. In this work, seven novel SNPs were detected, namely NC_019471:g.25504G>A (SNP1), g.25748G>A (SNP2), g.26902 A>G (SNP3), g.32001 C>G (SNP4), g.32029 A>G (SNP5), g.163442 C>G (SNP6), g.163517A>G (SNP7).
In order to detect these SNPs, the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and PCR- amplification-created restriction site (ACRS)-RFLP were carried out. i) For the NC_019471:g.25504 G>A (SNP1) locus, the endonuclease Thermus aquaticus YT-1 (TaqI) (TCGA) was used to genotype the SNP of g.25504 G, not g.25504 A. ii) For the NC_019471: g.25748 G>A (SNP2) locus, created restriction endonuclease Moraxella species (Msp1) site (CCGG) was formed when the forward primer actual nucleotide “T” was induced to “C” at NC_019471: g.25746 locus. Thus the Msp1 could recognize the SNP of g.25748 G with induced point mutation g.25746 C, not with g.25746 T. iii) For the NC_019471: g.26902 A>G (SNP3) locus, new restriction endonuclease Haemophilus influenzae Rf (HinfI) site (GANTC) was established by changing the reverse primer actual nucleotide “A” to “T” at NC_019471: g.26905 locus. Then the SNP of g.26902 G with induced point mutation g.26905 T could be genotyped by HinfI PCR -ACRS-RFLP, rather than g.26905 A. iv) For the NC_019471: g.32001 C>G (SNP4) locus, the endonuclease Bacillus megaterium T110 (AvaI) site (CYCGRG) was used to genotype the allele of g. 32001 G, not the g. 32001 C. v) Since the NC_019471: g.32029 A>G (SNP5) also could not be genotyped by the natural restriction or economic restriction endonuclease, the other reverse primer was designed to form new restriction endonuclease Streptomyces achromogenes (ScaII) (CCGCGG) point. The actual nucleotide “A” was induced into “G” at the NC_019471: g.32031, so the Streptomyces achromogenes (ScaII) could genotype the SNP of g.32029 G with induced point mutation g.32031G, not with g.32031 A. vi) For the NC_019471: g.163442 C>G (SNP6) locus, the endonuclease pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (PstI) (CTGCAG) was used to genotype the SNP of g. 163442 G, not g. 163442 C. vii) For the NC_019471: g.163517A>G (SNP7) locus, the endonuclease MspI (CCGG) was used to genotype the SNP of g. g.163517 G, not g. g.163517 A.
For the above loci, the 8 μL PCR products were digested with 3 U TaqI, MspI, HinfI, AvaI, ScaII, PstI, MspI, respectively, for 12 h at 37°C except TaqI and HinfI, at 65°C. The digested products were detected by electrophoresis of 1.5% to 3.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.

Statistical analysis

Genotypic frequencies, allelic frequencies and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were analyzed by the SHEsis program (http://analysis.bio-x.cn) (Li et al., 2009), as well as linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure and haplotypes across seven SNPs loci in HNBG and XNSN breeds (Wang et al., 2013). According to PopGene version 1.3.1 (Yeh et al., 2000), population parameters, such as gene heterozygosity (He), effective allele numbers (Ne) and polymorphism information content (PIC) were calculated.
The associations of the genetic variations and growth-related traits were calculated according to the general linear model by the SPSS software (version 18.0) (International Business Machines [IBM] Corporation, New York, USA) for Windows. Statistical testing was carried on the records of growth traits of HNBG and XNSN goats. The mixed statistical of the linear model analysis, not including the effects of farm, sex, season of birth (spring versus fall), age of dam and sire, which had no significant effects on the variation of traits in the mammal populations (Lan et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2013). Therefore, the statistical linear model was: Yijk = μ+Ai+Gj+eijk,, where Yijk is the observation of the body measurement traits, μ is the overall mean of each trait, Ai is the fixed effect of age, Gj is the fixed effect of genotype or combined genotype, and eijk is the random residual error (He et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014). Thus the fixed effect of genotypes and age was a major source of variation and the p-value for the difference between the least squares means was less than 0.05. Diplotypes of combined haplotypes of SNPs with growth traits correlation analysis were carried out to explore the possible interactions between the SNPs. The model was similar to above model analysis, except that the interaction between two SNPs was treated as a fixed effect.

RESULTS

Novel nucleotide variations within goat ATBF1 gene

After DNA sequencing and alignment analysis, seven SNPs loci were firstly found, namely, SNP1-7 (Figure 1). The SNP1-TaqI locus (25504 G>A) was located at exon 2 and mutated from G to A, resulting in a missense mutation, CGA (372 R) to CAA (372 Q), which could be genotyped by the TaqI PCR-RFP method (Figure 2a). The SNP2-MspI locus (25748 G>A) was located at exon 2 and mutated from G to A, resulting in a synonymous change, TCG (453 Ser) to TCA (453 Ser), which could be genotyped by the MspI PCR-ACRS-RFP method (Figure 2b). The SNP3-HinfI locus (26902 A>G) was located at exon3 and mutated from A to G, resulting in a missense change, AAA (453 K) to TCA (453 E), which could be genotyped by the HinfI PCR-ACRS-RFP method (Figure 2c). The SNP4-AvaI locus (32001 C>G) was located at intron 3 and mutated from C to G, which could be genotyped by the AvaI PCR-RFP method (Figure 2d). The SNP5-ScaII locus (32029 A>G) was located at intron 3 and mutated from A to G, which could be genotyped by the ScaII PCR-ACRS-RFP method (Figure 2e). The SNP6-PstI locus (163442 C>G) was located at exon 8 and mutated from C to G, which could be genotyped by the PstI PCR-RFP method (Figure 2f). The SNP7-MspI locus (163517A>G) was located at intron 8 and mutated from A to G, which could be genotyped by the MspI PCR-RFP method (Figure 2g).

Frequencies of genotypes and alleles within goat ATBF1 gene

Statistics analysis showed that the frequencies of genotypes and main alleles are different at different SNP loci in two goat breeds (Table 2). For example, only one genotype of SNP4-AvaI, SNP5-SacII, and SNP6-PstI was found in HNBG, but three genotypes were found in XNSN dairy goat. The frequencies of two alleles of each SNP locus in XNSN dairy goat, SNP4-AvaI and SNP5-SacII loci were approximately same except the SNP6-PstI locus. As shown in Table 2, the frequencies of the two alleles of SNP2-MspI were similar in both HNBG and XNSN dairy goats, as well as SNP7-MspI locus. The classification of PIC values demonstrated that all SNPs loci were medium genetic diversity except those that had only one kind of genotype and most SNPs loci were at HWE except SNP2-MspI and SNP5-SacII loci in XNSN dairy goat and SNP7-MspI locus in HNBG.

Haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium analysis

Four haplotypes were found in HNBG while seventeen haplotypes in XNSN dairy goat (Table 3). Only 1 haplotype (hap 1) was simultaneously found in both breeds, but the frequency was low (8.5%). The frequency of the hap 4 (27.5%) was highest in HNBG, and the hap 13 (14.1%) was the highest in XNSN dairy goat.
The LD of seven SNPs in two populations was analyzed. As shown in Table 4 and Figure 3, the D′ and r2 values of HNBG were very low (approximately zero), except the D′ values (0.861) and r2 values (0.02) between SNP6 and SNP7 loci. As shown in Table 5 and Figure 4, the r2 values of XNSN were very low as well as the D′ values, except the D′ values between SNP4 and SNP5 (0.670), SNP4 and SNP6 (0.574), SNP4 and SNP7 (0.642), SNP6 and SNP7 (0.737).

Relationships between the genetic variations and related-growth traits

The associations of the genetic variations with growth related traits except SNP1 and SNP3 loci were determined (Table 6). In the SNP2-MspI locus, the genotype of AG had demonstrated significantly superior HuWI traits than genotype GG in HNBG, while genotype GG was found to have significantly superior BL, ChC, and ChCI traits when compared with genotype AA, as well as genotype GG and AG had significantly superior BLI traits in XNSN dairy goat. The different genotypes of SNP5-ScaII locus had significantly associated with BW, demonstrating that the genotype AA and GG was superior to AG in XNSN dairy goat. The different genotypes of SNP6-PstI locus had significant associate with BL, which demonstrated that the genotype CC and GG was superior to CG in XNSN dairy goat. In SNP7-MspI locus, the different genotypes were found to be significantly associate with CaC and CaCI traits in HNBG and TI trait in XNSN dairy goat. For the locus, the genotype GG was superior in HNBG and genotype AA and AG in XNSN dairy goat.

Effects of the interaction of each two single nucleotide polymorphisms to growth traits

Though the r2 values of HNBG between SNP6 and SNP7 were low, but at the same time, the D′ values were high (0.861), so we analyzed the effects of the interaction between SNP6 and SNP7 of HNBG with growth traits as well as between SNP4 and SNP5 (0.670), SNP4 and SNP6 (0.574), SNP4 and SNP7 (0.642), SNP6 and SNP7 (0.737) of XNSN. As shown in Table 7, the diplotypes of SNP6 and SNP7 were found to have significant effects on ChC (p = 0.025). The phenotype ChC trait of combined genotypes CC-AA, CC-AG, CC-GG, CG-AG, and GG-GG was greater than CG-GG in XNSN.

DISCUSSION

As a cancer suppressor gene, ATBF1 gene not only regulates cell proliferation and differentiation (Ninomiya et al., 2002; Ishii et al., 2003; Jung et al., 2011), but also interacts with PIAS3 to suppress STAT3 signaling way (Nishio et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2014). Most importantly, ATBF1 is necessary for the Pit1 gene activation, indicating that ATBF1 could indirectly participate in the regulative roles of Pit1 gene, including regulating Wnt/beta-catenin pathway and POU1F1 pathway (Carvalho et al., 2006; Qi et al., 2008; Davis et al., 2010). All these functional experiments suggested that the ATBF1 gene would affect growth traits of livestock. Therefore, this work studied the relationship between the nucleotide variations of this gene and growth related traits in goats.
We found seven novel SNPs, of which two were missense mutations (SNP1 and SNP3), two were synonymous changes (SNP2 and SNP6) and three SNPs loci (SNP4, SNP5, and SNP7) were located at several introns. The missense mutation loci (SNP1 and SNP3) only had one kind of genotype of each locus, meaning that the mutation frequency was very low. The missense mutation with amino acid change could affect protein structure, resulting in loss of normal function, which might cause embryonic lethality. We detected haplotypes structure and found the common haplotype (hap1) had a relatively high frequency in two breeds, for the haplotype was present in the population for a long time. The haplotypes of highest frequencies in HNBG and XNSN dairy goat were different, probably caused by variety distinctiveness.
Association testing revealed that the SNP2, SNP5, SNP6 and SNP7 loci were also found to significantly associate with growth-related traits in goats. Among them, although SNP2 and SNP6 were synonymous mutations, they might affect transcriptional efficiency for codon preference and stability of mRNA (Chamary et al., 2005). Many studies have shown that no change of amino acid sequence could still affect gene performance, for example, two synonymous SNPs of bovine NUCB2 gene were significantly associated with growth traits (Li et al., 2010). Although SNP5 and SNP7 were intronic mutations, they also might affect alternatively spliced transcripts of mRNA or transcription factor binding, thus affecting phenotype. A famous example of intronic mutation was located at intron 3 of the porcine IGF2 gene. This mutation lead to a significant effect in skeletal muscle (Van et al., 2003). Besides, the combined genotypes of SNP6 and SNP7 in Xinong Saanen dairy goats was significantly linked to growth related traits. Therefore, this association data reflected that these nucleotide variations within ATBF1 gene produced significant effects on growth related traits, suggesting that this gene can be used as a marker gene in improving goat growth traits.
Briefly, seven novel SNPs mutations were firstly found, and four of them significantly affected goat growth related traits, which extends the known genetic variations spectrum of goat ATBF1 gene and is a benefit towards implementing MAS in genetics and breeding of goats.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31172184), the Young New Star Project on Science & Technology of Shaanxi Province (No.2011kjxx64) and Technology Foundation for Selected Overseas Chinese Scholar of Shaanxi Province (Xianyong Lan, 2014). We greatly thank the staff of the dairy goat breeding farm, Sanyuan country, Shaanxi province, P.R. China, the meat goat breeding farm, Zanzhou, Hainan province, P.R. China, for their collecting dairy goat samples and meat goat samples.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Figure 1
Sequence chromas of seven novel SNPs loci of the goat ATBF1 gene. a to g represented the pooling sequence chromas of NC_019471:g.25504G>A (SNP1), g.25748G>A (SNP2), g.26902 A>G (SNP3), g.32001 C>G (SNP4), g.32029 A>G (SNP5), g.163442 C>G (SNP6), g.163517A>G (SNP7), respectively. SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; ATBF1, AT motif-binding factor 1.
ajas-28-10-1394f1.gif
Figure 2
Electrophoresis pattern of seven novel genetic variations of goat ATBF1 gene. a to g represented the electrophoresis pattern of the SNP1-7 loci, respectively. ATBF1, AT motif-binding factor 1; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
ajas-28-10-1394f2.gif
Figure 3
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot of ATBF1 gene in HNBG. ATBF1, AT motif-binding factor 1; HNBG, Hainan Black goat.
ajas-28-10-1394f3.gif
Figure 4
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot of ATBF1 gene in XNSN. ATBF1, AT motif-binding factor 1; XNSN, Xinong Saanen dairy goat.
ajas-28-10-1394f4.gif
Table 1
PCR primer sequences of the goat ATBF1 gene for amplification
Loci Primer sequences (5′→3′) Tm (°C) Sizes (bp) Detection methods
P1 Forward: AAGGACAATGGGTGCGGTAT (nt24226-24245)
Reverse: AGCGGTGGAAACTAAAGGGA (nt25435-25454)
60 1,229 Pool DNA sequencing
P2 (SNP1) Forward: CTTTCCACATAGCCTCATCCTT(nt24979-25000)
Reverse: TTTATTGGCACTTTCATCAGCA (nt26159-26180)
62.5 1,202 TaqI PCR-RFLP (AA = 824+159+112+105 bp; AG = 824+517+307+159+112+105 bp; GG = 517+307+159+112+105+ bp)
P2 (mis-match-SNP2) ajas-28-10-1394f5.gif
Reverse: TCGCACCATCAAAGACAAC(nt26064-26082)
55 MspI PCR-RFLP (AA = 365 bp; AG = 365+337+28 bp; GG = 337+28 bp)
P3 Forward: TGCTGATGAAAGTGCCAATA (nt26159-26178)
Reverse: TTGACGAAACCCGAAAGTAG (nt27525-27564)
62.5 1,406 Pool DNA sequencing
P3 (mis-match-SNP3) Forward: ATGCGACACGGTCCTGG(nt26321-26337)
ajas-28-10-1394f6.gif
61.3 HinfI PCR-RFLP (AA = 533 bp; AG = 533+503+30 bp; GG = 503+30 bp)
P4 (SNP4) Forward: GTGTCAGGTGTCCCATAGCC (nt31489-31508):
Reverse: AATGCCAGTCCCTCCAGTTA (nt32615-32634)
62.8 1,146 AvaI PCR-RFLP (CC = 1082+71 bp; CG = 1082+574+508+71 bp; GG = 574+508+71 bp)
P4 (mis-match-SNP5) Forward: AGCAGTGGATAGCACCTTG(nt31888-31905)
ajas-28-10-1394f7.gif
58.3 172 ScaII PCR-RFLP (AA = 172 bp; AG = 172+140+32 bp; GG = 140+32 bp)
P5 Forward: ATGGACGATGCACGAACC (nt88882-88899)
Reverse: GATCTGAACCCAAAGACTGAA (nt89740-89760)
59.5 879 Pool DNA sequencing
P6 Forward: GCTCAGGCACCACGAAG (nt144646-144662)
Reverse: CAGGACACCAGGGATACAAA (nt145712-145731)
59.5 1,086 Pool DNA sequencing
P7 (SNP6, SNP7) Forward: GACTCTTACCCAGCACGTACCCT(nt162942-162964)
Reverse: TAACAGAAACCCACCATCCACAA(nt164391-164413)
55.9 1,472 PstI PCR-RFLP
(CC = 1,260+212 bp; CG = 1,260+757+503+212 bp; GG = 757+503+212 bp) MspI PCR-RFLP
(AA = 1064+203+135+70 bp; AG = 1064+898+203+166+135+70 bp; GG = 898+203+166+135+70 bp)
P8 Forward: TGTTAGTTCAGGGTCAGTTC(nt172005-172022)
Reverse: ATGGAGACATCATAAGGGAG(nt173796-173815)
58 1,811 Pool DNA sequencing
P9 Forward: TCCTCCCTTATGATGTCTCCA(nt173794-173814)
Reverse: GGTAGTTCAAGTTGCTCGTTC(nt177384-177404)
50 3,611 Pool DNA sSequencing
P10 Forward: GTACCGCGAGCACTACGACA(nt176420-176439):
Reverse: GGACCTCAGGGAACAGCAAA(nt180298-180317)
64 3,898 Pool DNA sequencing
P11 Forward: AACCGTCCTCAGCATCGC (nt184007-184024)
Reverse: CGTGTCAGACTCCTCCGAAT (nt185402-185421)
60 1,415 Pool DNA sequencing

PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ATBF1, AT motif-binding factor 1; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; TaqI, Thermus aquaticus YT-1; MspI, Moraxella species; HinfI, Haemophilus influenzae Rf; AvaI, Bacillus megaterium T110; ScaII, Streptomyces achromogenes; PstI, pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor; PCR-RFLP, PCR- restriction fragment length polymorphism.

1 ajas-28-10-1394f8.gif showed a mismatch of forward or reverse primer for creating a restriction site.

Table 2
Genotypes, alleles, He, Ne, and PIC for the SNPs of the goat ATBF1 gene
Breeds/loci Sizes (N) Genotype numbers and frequencies (%) Allele frequencies (%) HWE p values Population parameters

He Ne PIC



SNP1- TaqI AA AG GG A G
 HNBG 284 0 0 284(100) 0 100 >0.05 0 1 0
 XNSN 423 0 0 423(100) 0 100 >0.05 0 1 0
SNP2-MspI AA AG GG A G
 HNBG 284 70(24.6) 144(50.7) 70(24.6) 50 50 >0.05 0.500 2.000 0.375
 XNSN 423 136(32.2) 83(19.6) 204(48.2) 41.9 58.1 <0.01 0.487 1.950 0.368
SNP3-HinfI AA AG GG A G
 HNBG 284 284(100) 0 0 100 0 >0.05 0 1 0
 XNSN 423 423(100) 0 0 100 0 >0.05 0 1 0
SNP4-AvaI CC CG GG C G
 HNBG 284 284(100) 0 0 100 0 >0.05 0 1 0
 XNSN 423 102(24.2) 183(43.3) 138(32.5) 45.8 54.2 <0.05 0.496 1.986 0.373
SNP5-SacII AA AG GG A G
 HNBG 284 284(100) 0 0 100 0 >0.05 0 1 0
 XNSN 423 171(40.4) 153(36.2) 99(23.4) 58.5 41.5 <0.01 0.492 1.968 0.371
SNP6-PstI CC CG GG C G
 HNBG 284 283(99.6) 1(0.4) 0 99.8 0.2 >0.05 0.500 2.000 0.375
 XNSN 423 263(62.2) 140(33.1) 20(4.7) 78.6 21.4 >0.05 0.460 1.851 0.354
SNP7-MspI AA AG GG A G
 HNBG 284 72(25.4) 102(35.9) 110(38.7) 43.3 56.7 <0.01 0.491 1.965 0.370
 XNSN 423 137(32.5) 188(44.4) 98(23.1) 54.7 45.3 >0.05 0.496 1.983 0.373

He, gene heterozygosity; Ne, effective allele numbers; PIC, polymorphism information content; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; ATBF1, AT motif-binding factor 1; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; HNBG, Hainan Black goat; XNSN, Xinong Saanen dairy goat.

Table 3
Haplotype frequency within the ATBF1 gene in goat breeds
Different haplotypes SNP1-SNP2-SNP3-SNP4- SNP5-SNP6-SNP7 Haplotype frequency

HNBG XNSN
Hap1 G A A C A C A 0.225 0.085
Hap2 G A A C A C G 0.272 0
Hap3 G G A C A C A 0.228 0
Hap4 G G A C A C G 0.275 0
Hap5 G A A C A G G 0 0.015
Hap6 G A A C G C A 0 0.134
Hap7 G A A G A C A 0 0.046
Hap8 G A A G A C G 0 0.020
Hap9 G A A G A G G 0 0.027
Hap10 G A A G G C G 0 0.139
Hap11 G A A G G G A 0 0.016
Hap12 G A A G G G G 0 0.077
Hap13 G G A C A C A 0 0.141
Hap14 G G A C A C G 0 0.027
Hap15 G G A C A G G 0 0.020
Hap16 G G A C G C A 0 0.019
Hap17 G G A G A C A 0 0.016
Hap18 G G A G G C A 0 0.058
Hap19 G G A G G C G 0 0.036
Hap20 G G A G G G G 0 0.124

ATBF1, AT motif-binding factor 1; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; HNBG, Hainan Black goat; XNSN, Xinong Saanen dairy goat; Hap, haplotype.

Table 4
D′ and r2 values of pairwise linkage disequilibrium of the ATBF1 gene in HNBG goat
HNBG-locus/D′ SNP1 SNP2 SNP3 SNP4 SNP5 SNP6 SNP7
 SNP1 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 SNP2 - - 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001
 SNP3 - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 SNP4 - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00
 SNP5 - - - - - 0.00 0.00
 SNP6 - - - - - - 0.861
 SNP7 - - - - - - -
HNBG-locus/r2
 SNP1 - 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00
 SNP2 - - 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00
 SNP3 - - - 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00
 SNP4 - - - - 0.000 0.00 0.00
 SNP5 - - - - - 0.00 0.00
 SNP6 - - - - - - 0.02
 SNP7 - - - - - - -

ATBF1, AT motif-binding factor 1; HNBG, Hainan Black goat; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

Table 5
D′ and r2 values of pairwise linkage disequilibrium of the ATBF1 gene in XNSN goat
Locus/D′ SNP1 SNP2 SNP3 SNP4 SNP5 SNP6 SNP7
 SNP1 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 SNP2 - - 0.00 0.026 0.190 0.073 0.005
 SNP3 - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 SNP4 - - - - 0.670 0.574 0.642
 SNP5 - - - - - 0.461 0.306
 SNP6 - - - - - - 0.737
 SNP7 - - - - - - -
Locus/r2
 SNP1 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 SNP2 - - 0.00 0.00 0.029 0.002 0.00
 SNP3 - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 SNP4 - - - - 0.256 0.086 0.301
 SNP5 - - - - - 0.077 0.081
 SNP6 - - - - - - 0.186
 SNP7 - - - - - - -

ATBF1, AT motif-binding factor 1; XNSN, Xinong Saanen dairy goat; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

Table 6
Relationship between the novel SNPs of the goat ATBF1 gene and growth traits
Locus/growth traits Observed genotypes (LSM±SE) p value
SNP2-MspI
 XNSN breed AA AG GG
 BL 75.21±0.79 b 77.50±0.90a b 77.58±0.61 a 0. 039
 ChC 87.58±0.91 b 89.57±0.90 a b 90.35±0.71 a 0. 045
 BLI 111.01±1.34 b 114.98±0.97a 115.14±0.99 a 0. 021
 ChCI 129.22±1.46 b 132.96±1.23ab 134.12±1.23 a 0. 027
 HNBG breed AA AG GG
 HuWI 109.40±1.80 ab 111.72±1.20 a 105.39±1.25b 0.007
SNP5-ScaII
 XNSN breed AA AG GG
 BW 68.25±0. 47 a 66.82±0.45b 69.33±0. 59a 0. 004
 SNP6-PstI
 XNSN breed CC CG GG
 BL 77.66±0.43 a 76.23±0.63b 80.65±1.42 a 0. 016
SNP7-MspI
 XNSN breed AA AG GG
 TI 116.20±0.75 a 116.92±0.69a 113.84±0.68 b 0. 018
 HNBG breed AA AG GG
 CaC 7.70±0. 09 b 7.65±0. 08 b 7.96±0. 07 a 0. 009
 CaCI 14.59±0.19a b 14.51±0.21b 15.06±0.13 a 0. 046

SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; ATBF1, AT motif-binding factor 1; LSM, lease squares means; SE, standard error; MspI, Moraxella species; XNSN, Xinong Saanen dairy goat; BL, body length; ChC, chest circumference; BLI, body length index; ChCI, chest circumference index; HNBG, Hainan Black goat; HuWI, hucklebone width index; ScaII, Streptomyces achromogenes; BW, body weight; MspI, Moraxella species; TI, trunk index; CaC, cannon circumference; CaCI, cannon circumference index.

The values with different letters (a and b) within the same row differ significantly at p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively.

Table 7
Associations between diplotypes (combined genotypes and haplotype) of SNPs and growth traits in XNSN
Growth traits Diplotype loci (SNP6+SNP7) p value
ChC (cm) CC-AA (n = 53) CC-AG (n = 50) CC-GG (n = 13) CG-AG (n = 36) CG-GG (n = 20) GG-GG (n = 8)
89.04±0.80a 89.96±0.74a 91.00±1.03a 89.94±1.05a 85.85±1.17b 92.62±1.51a 0.025

SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; XNSN, Xinong Saanen dairy goat; ChCI, chest circumference index.

The values with different letters (a and b) within the same row differ significantly at p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively.

REFERENCES

Akcay A., Ulucan K., Taskin N., Boyraz M., Akcay T., Zurita O., Gomez A., Heath KE., & Campos-Barros A. 2013. Suprasellar mass mimicking a hypothalamic glioma in a patient with a complete PROP1 deletion. Eur J Med Genet. 56:445–451.
crossref pmid
Araujo RV., Chang CV., Cescato VAS., Fragoso MCBV., Bronstein MD., Mendonca BB., Arnhold IJP., & Carvalho LRS. 2013. PROP1 overexpression in corticotrophinomas: evidence for the role of PROP1 in the maintenance of cells committed to corticotrophic differentiation. Clinics. 68:887–891.
crossref pmid pmc
Bastos E., Ávila S., Cravador A., Renaville R., Guedes PH., & Luis CJ. 2006. Identification and characterization of four splicing variants of ovine POU1F1 gene. Gene. 382:12–19.
crossref pmid
Benjamin EJ., Rice KM., Arking DE., Pfeufer A., van Noord C., Smith AV., Schnabel RB., Bis JC., Boerwinkle E., & Sinner MF. , et al2009. Variants in ZFHX3 are associated with atrial fibrillation in individuals of European ancestry. Nat Genet. 41:879–881.
crossref pmid pmc
Carvalho L., Ward RD., Brinkmeier ML., Potok MA., Vesper AH., & Camper SA. 2006. Molecular basis for pituitary dysfunction: Comparison of Prop1 and Pit1 mutant mice. Dev Biol. 295:340
crossref
Chamary JV., & Hurst LD. 2005. Evidence for selection on synonymous mutations affecting stability of mRNA secondary structure in mammals. Genome Biol. 6:R75
crossref pmid pmc
Choudhary V., Kumar P., Bhattacharya TK., Bhushan B., Sharma A., & Shukla A. 2007. DNA polymorphism of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 gene and its association with birth weight and body weight in cattle. J Anim Breed Genet. 124:29–34.
crossref pmid
Cleton-Jansen AM., van Eijk R., Lombaerts M., Schmidt MK., Van’t Veer LJ., Philippo K., Zimmerman RME., Peterse JL., Smit VTBHM., van Wezel T., Cornelisse CJ., Cleton-Jansen AM., Van Eijk R., & Lombaerts M. 2008. ATBF1 and NQO1 as candidate targets for allelic loss at chromosome arm 16q in breast cancer: Absence of somatic ATBF1 mutations and no role for the C609T NQO1 polymorphism. BMC Cancer. 8:105
crossref pmid pmc
Darnell JE. 1997. STATs and gene regulation. Science. 277:53321630–1635.
crossref pmid
Davis SW., Castinetti F., Carvalho LR., Ellsworth BS., Potok MA., Lyons RH., Brinkmeier ML., Raetzman LT., Carninci P., Mortensen AH., Hayashizaki Y., Arnhold IJP., Mendonca BB., Brue T., & Camper SA. 2010. Molecular mechanisms of pituitary organogenesis: In search of novel regulatory genes. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 323:4–19.
crossref pmid pmc
Fang Q., Giordimaina AM., Dolan DF., Camper SA., & Mustapha M. 2012. Genetic Background of Prop1(df) mutants provides remarkable protection against hypothyroidism-induced hearing impairment. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 13:173–184.
crossref pmid pmc
Fang XT., Xu HX., Zhang CL., Zhang JM., Lan XY., Gu CW., & Chen H. 2010. Polymorphisms in BMP-2 gene and their associations with growth traits in goats. Genes Genomics. 32:29–35.
crossref
Gilbert RP., Bailey DR., & Shannon NH. 1993. Linear body measurements of cattle before and after twenty years of selection for post weaning gain when fed two different diets. J Anim Sci. 71:1712–1720.
crossref pmid
Godi M., Mellone S., Tiradani L., Marabese R., Bardelli C., Salerno M., Prodam F., Bellone S., Petri A., Momigliano-Richiardi P., Bona G., & Giordano M. 2012. Functional SNPs within the intron 1 of the PROP1 gene contribute to combined growth hormone deficiency (CPHD). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 97:E1791–E1797.
crossref pmid
Green MR., & Sambrook J. 2012. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press;New York, USA: p. 65–73.

Gudbjartsson DF., Holm H., Gretarsdottir S., Thorleifsson G., Walters GB., Thorgeirsson G., Gulcher J., Mathiesen EB., Njølstad I., & Nyrnes A. , et al2009. A sequence variant in ZFHX3 on 16q22 associates with atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke. Nat Genet. 41:876–878.
crossref pmid pmc
Guy JC., Hunter CS., Showalter AD., Smith TPL., Charoonpatrapong K., Sloop KW., Bidwell JP., & Rhodes SJ. 2004. Conserved amino acid sequences confer nuclear localization upon the Prophet of Pit-1 pituitary transcription factor protein. Gene. 336:263–273.
crossref pmid
He H., Zhang HL., Li ZX., Liu Y., & Liu XL. 2014. Expression, SNV identification, linkage disequilibrium, and combined genotype association analysis of the muscle-specific gene CSRP3 in Chinese cattle. Gene. 535:17–23.
crossref pmid
Heinrich PC., Behrmann I., Muller-Newen G., Schaper F., & Graeve L. 1998. Interleukin-6-type cytokine signalling through the gp130/Jak/STAT pathway. Biochem J. 334:297–314.
crossref pmid pmc
Ishii Y., Kawaguchi M., Takagawa K., Oya T., Nogami S., Tamura A., Miura Y., Ido A., Sakata N., Hashimoto-Tamaoki T., Kimura T., Saito T., Tamaoki T., & Sasahara M. 2003. ATBF1-A protein, but not ATBF1-B, is preferentially expressed in developing rat brain. J Comp Neurol. 465:57–71.
crossref pmid
Jiang Q., Ni B., Shi J., Han ZL., Qi RD., Xu WH., Wang D., Wang DW., & Chen ML. 2014. Down-regulation of ATBF1 activates STAT3 signaling via PIAS3 in pacing-induced HL-1 atrial myocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 449:278–283.
crossref pmid
Jung CG., Kim HJ., Kawaguchi M., Khanna KK., Hida H., Asai K., Nishino H., & Miura Y. 2005. Homeotic factor ATBF1 induces the cell cycle arrest associated with neuronal differentiation. Development. 132:5137–5145.
crossref pmid
Jung CG., Uhm KO., Miura Y., Hosono T., Horike H., Khanna KK., Kim MJ., & Michikawa M. 2011. Beta-amyloid increases the expression level of ATBF1 responsible for death in cultured cortical neurons. Mol Neurodegener. 6:47
crossref pmid pmc
Kai K., Zhang Z., Yamashita H., Yamamoto Y., Miura Y., & Iwase H. 2008. Loss of heterozygosity at the ATBF1-A locus located in the 16q22 minimal region in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 8:262
crossref pmid pmc
Kamohara Y., Sugiyama N., Mizuguchi T., Inderbitzin D., Lilja H., Middleton Y., Neuman T., Demetriou AA., & Rozga J. 2000. Inhibition of signal transducer and activator transcription factor 3 in rats with acute hepatic failure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 273:129–135.
crossref pmid
Lan XY., Pan CY., Chen H., Zhang CL., Li JY., Zhao M., Lei CZ., Zhang AL., & Zhang L. 2007. An AluI PCR-RFLP detecting a silent allele at the goat POU1F1 locus and its association with production traits. Small Rumin Res. 73:8–12.
crossref
Lan XY., Zhao HY., Li ZJ., Zhou R., Pan CY., Lei CZ., & Chen H. 2013. Exploring the novel genetic variant of PITX1 gene and its effect on milk performance in dairy goats. J Integr Agric. 12:118–126.
crossref
Li M., Fu X., Ma G., Sun XD., Dong XY., Nagy T., Xing CS., Li J., & Dong JT. 2012. Atbf1 regulates pubertal mammary gland development likely by inhibiting the pro-proliferative function of estrogen-ER signaling. PLoS One. 7:12e51283
crossref pmid pmc
Li M., Zhao D., Ma G., Zhang B., Fu X., Zhu Z., Fu L., Sun X., & Dong JT. 2013. Upregulation of ATBF1 by progesterone-PR signaling and its functional implication in mammary epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 430:358–363.
crossref pmid
Li F., Chen H., Lei CZ., Ren G., Wang J., Li ZJ., & Wang JQ. 2010. Novel SNPs of the bovine NUCB2 gene and their association with growth traits in three native Chinese cattle breeds. Mol Biol Rep. 37:541–546.
crossref pmid
Li ZQ., Zhang Z., He Z., Tang W., Li T., Zeng Z., He L., & Shi YY. 2009. A partition-ligation-combination-subdivision EM algorithm for haplotype inference with multiallelic markers: update of the SHEsis. Cell Res. 19:519–523.
crossref pmid
Massagué J. 2012. TGF-β signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 13:616–630.
crossref pmid pmc
Massagué J., Seoane J., & Wotton D. 2005. Smad transcription factors. Genes Dev. 19:2783–2810.
crossref pmid
Morinaga T., Yasuda H., Hashimoto T., Higashio K., & Tamaoki T. 1991. A human alpha-fetoprotein enhancer-binding protein, ATBF1, contains four homeodomains and seventeen zinc fingers. Mol Cell Biol. 11:6041–6049.
crossref pmid pmc
Moustakas A., & Heldin CH. 2009. The regulation of TGF-β signal transduction. Development. 136:3699–3714.
crossref pmid
Navardauskaite R., Dusatkova P., Obermannova B., Pfaeffle RW., Blum WF., Adukauskiene D., Smetanina N., Cinek O., Verkauskiene R., & Lebl J. 2014. High prevalence of PROP1 defects in Lithuania: Phenotypic findings in an ethnically homogenous cohort of patients with multiple pituitary hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 99:299–306.
crossref pmid
Ninomiya T., Mihara K., Fushimi K., Hayashi Y., Hashimoto-Tamaoki T., & Tamaoki T. 2002. Regulation of the alpha-fetoprotein gene by the isoforms of ATBF1 transcription factor in human hepatoma. Hepatology. 35:82–87.
crossref pmid
Nishio E., Miura Y., Kawaguchi M., & Morita A. 2012. Nuclear translocation of ATBF1 is a potential prognostic marker for skin cancer. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 20:239–245.
pmid
Nojiri S., Joh T., Miura Y., Sakata N., Nomura T., Nakao H., Sobue S., Oharra H., Asai K., & Ito M. 2004. ATBF1 enhances the suppression of STAT3 signaling by interaction with PIAS3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 314:97–103.
crossref pmid
Pan CY., Wu CY., Jia WC., Xu Y., Lei CZ., Hu SR., Lan XY., & Chen H. 2013. A critical functional missense mutation (H173R) in the bovine PROP1 gene significantly affects growth traits in cattle. Gene. 531:398–402.
crossref pmid
Perea D., Molohon K., Edwards K., & Diaz-Benjumea FJ. 2013. Multiple roles of the gene zinc finger homeodomain-2 in the development of the Drosophila wing. Mech Dev. 130:467–481.
crossref pmid
Qi YC., Ranish JA., Zhu XY., Krones A., Zhang J., Aebersold R., Rose DW., Rosenfeld MG., & Carriere C. 2008. Atbf1 is required for the Pit1 gene early activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:2481–2486.
crossref pmid pmc
Sakata N., Kaneko S., Ikeno S., Miura Y., Nakabayashi H., Dong XY., Dong JT., Tamaoki T., Nakano N., & Itoh S. 2014. TGF-β Signaling Cooperates with AT Motif-Binding Factor-1 for Repression of the α-Fetoprotein Promoter. J Signal Transduct Article ID. 970346.

Sambrock J., & Russell DW. 2001. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press;NY, USA:

Schindler C., & Darnell JE. 1995. Transcriptional responses to polypeptide ligands: The JAK-STAT pathway. Annu Rev Biochem. 64:621–652.
crossref pmid
Shuai K. 1999. The STAT family of proteins in cytokine signaling. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 71:405–422.
crossref pmid
Sun X., Fu X., Li J., Xing CS., Martin DW., Zhang HH., Chen ZJ., & Dong JT. 2012. Heterozygous deletion of Atbf1 by the Cre-loxP system in mice causes preweaning mortality. Genesis. 50:819–827.
crossref pmid pmc
Sun XD., Fu XY., Li J., Xing CS., Frierson HF., Wu H., Ding XK., Ju TZ., Cummings RD., & Dong JT. 2014. Deletion of Atbf1/Zfhx3 in mouse prostate causes neoplastic lesions, likely by attenuation of membrane and secretory proteins and multiple signaling pathways. Neoplasia. 16:377–389.
crossref pmid pmc
Sun XD., Zhou YF., Otto KB., Wang MR., Chen CS., Zhou W., Subramanian K., Vertino PM., & Dong JT. 2007. Infrequent mutation of ATBF1 in human breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin. 133:103–105.
crossref
Van Laere AS., Nguyen M., Braunschweig M., Nezer C., Collette C., Moreau L., Archibald AL., Haley CS., Buys N., & Tally M. , et al2003. A regulatory mutation in IGF2 causes a major QTL effect on muscle growth in the pig. Nature. 425:832–836.
crossref pmid
Wang AL., Zhang Y., Li MJ., Lan XY., Wang JQ., & Chen H. 2013. SNP identification in FBXO32 gene and their associations with growth traits in cattle. Gene. 515:181–186.
crossref pmid
Wang G., Zhang S., Wei S., Zhang Y., Li Y., Fu C., Zhao C., & Zan L. 2014. Novel polymorphisms of SIX4 gene and their association with body measurement traits in Qinchuan cattle. Gene. 539:107–110.
crossref pmid
Yasuda H., Mizuno A., Tamaoki T., & Morinaga T. 1994. ATBF1, a multiple-homeodomain zinc finger protein, selectively down-regulates AT-rich elements of the human α-fetoprotein gene. Mol Cell Biol. 14:1395–1401.
crossref pmid pmc
Yeh FC., Yang R., Boyle TJ., Ye Z., & Xiyan JM. 2000. PopGene32, Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis, version 1.32. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta;Edmonton, AB, Canada:

Zhao HY., Wu XF., Cai HF., Pan CY., Lei CZ., Chen H., & Lan XY. 2013. Genetic variants and effects on milk traits of the caprine paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) gene in dairy goats. Gene. 532:203–210.
crossref pmid
Zhong Z., Wen ZL., & Darnell JE. 1994. Stat3: A STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Science. 264:515595–98.
crossref pmid


ABOUT
SPECIALTIES
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS
Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul
08776, Korea   TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : jongkha@hotmail.com               

Copyright © 2017 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next