Molecular Characterization of Selected Local and Exotic Cattle Using RAPD Marker

Article information

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci.. 2012;25(6):751-757
1Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh
2School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China.
*Corresponding Author: M. Mahfuza Khatun. Tel: 86-411-8470 6308, Fax: 86-411-84706329, E-mail: oni.ku.bd@gmail.com
Received 2011 September 11; Revised 2012 January 22; Accepted 2011 November 06.

Abstract

In order to develop specific genetic markers and determine the genetic diversity of Bangladeshi native cattle (Pabna, Red Chittagong) and exotic breeds (Sahiwal), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was performed using 12 primers. Genomic DNA was extracted from 20 cattle (local and exotic) blood samples and extracted DNA was observed by gel electrophoresis. Among the random primers three were matched and found to be polymorphic. Genetic relations between cattle’s were determined by RAPD polymorphisms from a total of 66.67%. Statistical analysis of the data, estimating the genetic distances between cattle and sketching the cluster trees were estimated by using MEGA 5.05 software. Comparatively highest genetic distance (0.834) was found between RCC-82 and SL-623. The lowest genetic distance (0.031) was observed between M-1222 and M-5730. The genetic diversity of Red Chittagong and Sahiwal cattle was relatively higher for a prescribed breed. Adequate diversity in performance and adaptability can be exploited from the study results for actual improvement accruing to conservation and development of indigenous cattle resources.

INTRODUCTION

Cattle are the most common type of large domesticated ungulates of the subfamily Bovinae and belong to the genus Bos. Generally, cattle are raised as livestock for meat, milk leather, dung and draft purposes. It has been estimated that there were 1.3 billion cattle in the world (Bruford et al., 2003) whereas Bangladesh had 24 million cattle, out of which 6 million were dairy cattle of local and crossbreds (Bhuiyan, 1993). The available breeds in Bangladesh are Red Chittagong, local Pabna, Sahiwal cross breed, Holstein Frisian cross breeds etc. It is speculated that the Red Chittagong evolved through interbreeding among the local cattle on the basis of natural selection. Sahiwal are a breed of zebu cattle, primarily used in dairy production, from the Sahiwal district of Pakistan, a dry region of Punjab which lies along the Indian-Pakistani border (Mason, 1996). The Bangladeshi indigenous cattle breed (Pabna) and Red Chittagong breed, are of particular importance because of their favorable meat, milk, leather and draft quality although their productivity is relatively low in general. Dairying is considered a strong tool to develop village micro economy in Bangladesh (Shamsuddin et al., 2006) to improve rural livelihoods and to alleviate rural poverty. But, like other developing countries, breed substitution and crossbreeding programs have been practiced indiscriminately in Bangladesh for many years with exotic breeds and as a result valuable genetic resources are being lost or diluted.

Genetic diversity or similarity can be measured through genetic markers. These have been used to determine evolutionary relationships within and between species, genera or higher taxonomic categories (Cornuet et al., 1999). RAPD markers, generated by the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) have been widely used since the 1990’s to assess intra-specific genetic variation at the nuclear level (Garrigan et al., 2002). This procedure detects nucleotide sequence polymorphisms in a DNA amplification-based assay using only a single primer of an arbitrary nucleotide sequence. The polymorphism between individuals results from sequence differences in one or both of the primer binding sites and is visible as the presence or absence of a particular RAPD band. Therefore, in order to determine the genetic variability of selective native, exotic and cross cattle populations of Bangladesh, the research was undertaken using RAPD-PCR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal selection, blood sample collection and extraction of genomic DNA

The experiment was carried out at the Animal Cell Culture and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh during the period of November 2010 to May 2011. A total of 20 cattle were selected for this study, in which five were native Pabna (M-1222, M-5730, M-1893, LF-1414, M-1980), ten native Red Chittagong (RCC-5730, RCC-178, RCC-175, RCC-609, RCC-80, RCC-173, RCC-81, RCC-691, RCC-82, RCC-77) and five exotic Sahiwal (SL-571, SL-614, SL-623, SL-637, SL-638) cattle from Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Dhaka. Three ml of blood was collected from each animal in a 5 ml EDTA vaccutainer. The blood was gently mixed with EDTA (present in the vacationer) and kept at −20°C until the study start. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples following the method described by Roe et al. (1996) with some modifications. About 800 μl of blood was taken in a microcentrifuge tube and the cell membrane disrupted with 1X Standard Saline Citrate (SSC) buffer. Then the protein was precipitated by sodium acetate and digested with proteinase K at 55°C for 1 h. After that, the aqueous layer was removed by Phenol:Chloroform:Isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and precipitated with 100% ethanol. DNA was reprecipitated and washed with Na acetate and 70% ice cold ethanol. Finally DNA samples were dried and dissolved in TE buffer and stored at −20°C for further use.

Gel documentation, DNA quantification and PCR amplification

Presence of extracted DNA was confirmed by gel electrophoresis separation on 1% agarose gel and staining with ethidium bromide. Ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer set at 260 nm was used to quantify the DNA concentration prior to PCR. The PCR amplification conditions were set according to Williams et al. (1990). Primers were selected mainly based on GC content, intensity of bands, presence of smearing, consistency within individuals and potential for population discrimination. Primers that have GC content more than 60% are suitable for RAPD analysis. We selected twelve subsets of primers supplied by Bioneer, South Korea. PCR was carried out in MyGenie 96 thermal block, Bioneer, South Korea. PCR amplification followed the method of Simon et al. (2007). The PCR reaction was carried out in a final volume of 20 μl reaction mixture containing 2 μl of template (4ng DNA), 2 μl of 10× reaction buffer, 2 μl of dNTPs (250 mM each), 2 units of Taq DNA polymerase, 1 μl (100 picomol) of primer and 11 μl of sterile distilled water, respectively. The mixture was over layered with a drop of mineral oil. The PCR amplification conditions were: PCR lead at 105°C, hot start at 94°C for 4 min’s, denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 35°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 2 min’s, 35 cycles, final extension at 72°C for 10 min, holding at 4°C for 10 min and end.

Agarose gel electrophoresis and data analysis

Amplified PCR products were electrophoresised (Agaro-power system, Bioneer Corporation, South Korea) on an agarose gel (2%) in TAE buffer and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide solution. Polymorphic bands were observed by high performance UV transilluminator (UVP-UK) and pictures were taken by GEL DOC/Bio-Imaging System affiliated digital canon camera. In the study of genetic diversity, each germplasm was scored manually for presence or absence of a particular amplification product. Data was analyzed by the software GelQuest and MEGA5.05 for phylogenic analysis. RAPD matrix of the 20 cattle samples using OPA07, OPA03 and OPA09 primers were assembled for statistical analysis and the sizes of the DNA fragments were estimated using 100 bp ladders by co-electrophoresis with the PCR product DNA. The un-weighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) based dendrogram was constructed using the MEGA5.05. Numerical values were considered to construct the dendogram and presence of band (1) and absence of band (0) value considered for RAPD analysis. All possible pair-wise genetic distances were calculated according to Nei and Li (1979) using the following formula: dxy = 1−(2nxy/(nx+ny)), Where, nx and ny are the numbers of bands amplified in individuals x and y respectively and 2nxy is the number of bands shared by those individuals. In this analysis, smaller numbers are associated with more genetically similar individuals, whereas larger numbers suggest genetically dissimilarity.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The experimental cattle showed variability in genetical characteristics and the results indicated the effectiveness of RAPD analysis in detecting the level of polymorphism. Randomly 12 primers were tested among them three primers (Table 1) were matched and found polymorphic (Figures 1, 2 and 3).

List of primers those showed polymorphism

Figure 1

RAPD profiles using primer OPA-03. The number corresponds to the serial of the genotypes; M is a 100 bp DNA ladder. ‘a’ and ‘b’ bands were monomorphic for all the experimental animals.

Figure 2

RAPD profiles using primer OPA-07. On the gel ‘a’, ‘b’, ‘c’ and ‘d’ bands were monomorphic for all experimental animals.

Figure 3

RAPD profiles using primer OPA-09. ‘a’ is monomorphic for all experimental animals.

From the figures, it was observed that primer OPA-03 and OPA-07 were more reproducible and produced a more distinct RAPD profile than primer OPA-09. Three different primers generated various banding patterns and out of the 21 bands scored, 14 bands (66.67%) were found to be polymorphic and 7 bands (33.33%) were found to be monomorphic in nature. Different RAPD patterns generated using the primers in the present experiment are shown in Figure 1 to 3.

Table 2 shows that the frequencies of polymorphic bands varied from primer to primer in which primer OPA-03, OPA-07 and OPA-09 produced 80%, 42.85% and 75% polymorphic loci respectively. Primer OPA-03 produced 10 bands where one at 400 bp and the other 700 bp were monomorphic in all samples. The polymorphic fragments for primer OPA-03 ranged from 900 bp to 2,000 bp. Furthermore, primer OPA-07 and OPA-09 produced 7 and 4 bands, respectively. The range of monomorphic bands for primer OPA-07 and OPA-09 were 700 bp to 1,000 bp, 1,600 bp, respectively. Where as, the range of polymorphic bands were 400 bp to 600 bp and 800 bp to 1,200 bp, respectively. As the number of bands common in all animals produced by primer OPA-07 was (4) greater than the other two primers (2 for OPA-03 and 1 for OPA-09), it can be concluded that OPA-07 may be specific for species or for greater zoological classes (gender, family etc.). This point needs to be clarified in the future by a comparison with other species. Sharma et al. (2009) reported, the size of polymorphic bands ranged between 200 bp and 2,500 bp using 17 operon series random primers to characterize the Malvi and Sahiwal breeds of cattle in Madhya Pradesh, India. In another study involving indigenous African cattle, Gwakisa et al. (1994) used RAPD markers to characterize the local Zebu (Bos indicus) cattle breeds of Tanzania (using ILO 1127 primer) and showed 61% polymorphism which are almost similar to the present study. The degree of polymorphism 66.67% is higher compared to 28% in taurine cattle (Talle et al., 2005) and 18% in zebu cattle (Marle-Koster et al., 2003). Estimation of higher level of genetic variation in the breeds might be consistent with the fact that they are highly polymorphic animals. Polymorphisms at the level of individual, breed, species or gender can be produced by RAPD-PCR but it is difficult to identify the bands. No breed- or sex-specific RAPD bands were detected in this study. Nevertheless, by mean of their monomorphic band profiles, some of the investigated primers can give the information that animals not having these monomorphic bands may not be related to these cattle. More studies should be performed on this matter in comparative genome studies.

List of primers and their monomorphic and polymorphic bands

Pair wise genetic distance

From the Table 3 it can be found that the highest value of Nei and Li’s (1979) genetic distance (0.834) was between SL-623 and RCC-82. Lower estimates of genetic similarities indicated a high degree of genetic diversity between these two cattle. This may be due to their diverse origin and different purpose of raising these cattle. On the other hand, the lowest distance (0.031) existed between M-5730 and M-1222. It indicates, the genetic relationship between local cattle population was closer than others. Sharma et al. (2009) calculated between breed band sharing (BS), the value for these 2 breeds obtained was lower (0.43 to 0.66) than within breed BS value, which was 0.70 to 0.93 in Malvi breed and 0.68 to 0.88 in Sahiwal breed, found similar genetic distances of average animals like the present experiment.

Estimation of pair wise genetic distance between experimental cattle populations using Nei and Li’s (1979) equation

The present results revealed that there was a high level of genetic variaton among the studied cattle as indicated by the proportion of polymorphic loci. The values of pair-wise genetic distance among 20 cattle genotypes were computed from combined data sets for the 3 primers ranging from 0.834 to 0.031 (Table 3). Kemp and Teale (1994) identified population-specific DNA polymorphisms to detect Bos indicus and Bos taurus in West Africa. They estimated the allele frequency characteristics of cattle breeds using DNA markers (Buitcamp et al., 1991; Mannen and Tsuji, 1993; Glowatzki-Mullis et al., 1995; Choy et al., 2001). Heterozygosity estimates obtained for the Burlina breed were moderate to high and consistent to the value reported by Del Bo et al. (2001) that found an estimate of 0.68. However, such variability represents an important reservoir of genetic diversity that should be conserved. Genetic diversity is in fact important to allow genetic improvement in selected breeds as well as to facilitate rapid adaptation.

Dendrogram analysis

Estimation of genetic similarity within and between cattle and genetic distance among different cattle is an important application of the DNA based genetic markers. Dendrogram stability is an important aspect to be considered in genetic variability studies. An unweighted pair-group method of analysis (UPGMA) phylogenic tree based on genetic distance using the MEGA software (version 5.05) is shown in Figure 4. Dendogram depicted the relationship among twenty population of RCC, Sahiwal and local cattle. The dendogram segregated the twenty cattle into two major clusters: (I) and (II). Cluster I sub divided into IA and IB. Furthermore, cluster IA sub-clustered into IA (1) and IA (2). On the other hand, cluster IB subdivided into IB (1) and IB (2).

Figure 4

The unweighted pair group method of analysis (UPGMA) dendrogram based on summarized data regarding differentiation among experimental cattle.

Subcluster IA comprised of RCC-609, RCC-80, SL-637, SL-623, RCC-175, RCC-178, M-1222, M-5730 and RCC-78 cattle population and subcluster IB consisted of RCC-173, M-1980, RCC-691, RCC-81, M-1893, LF-1414 and SL-638 cattle population. On the other hand, cluster II belong cattle RCC-82, SL-571, SL-614 and RCC-77. From the dendogram, closely related indigenous population e.g., RCC and SL co-existed in cluster II might be due to their same origin as well as lower genetic variability. Whereas, local Pabna and RCC randomly segregated between subcluster IB and Cluster IA. The possible reasons for their random segregation could be the indiscriminate breeding/crossing, migration of animals, mutation in ancestors or due to different origin.

Moreover, the long genetic distance between SL-623 and local RCC-82 indicates that they can be crossed for parent development. The highest genetic diversity is alarming as it indicates that the population may deteriorate due to crossing with other populations of either native or exotic blood. In another similar study, Yu et al. (2004) used RAPD analysis to estimate genetic diversity and relationship of two native cattle breeds from the Yunnan province of China (De Hong cattle and Di Qing cattle) and four introduced beef cattle breeds (Brahman, Simmental, Murry Grey, and Short Horn). Using 10 primers, it was observed that the Yunnnan DeHong cattle breed was closely related to the Brahman (Bos indicus), and the Yunnan DiQing cattle breed was closely related to the Simmental, short horn, and Murry grey (Bos taurus) breeds. It is reported that uncontrolled hybridizations are increasing and the phylogenic relationship of the RCC and Local Pabna cattle is close because regional animal cooperative systems have been using RCC bulls for breeding programs since 1995 (Ahmed, 2000).

The high level of polymorphism obtained by the present study indicates that RAPD markers could be considered as effective tools for estimating genetic diversity in experimental cattle populations. For a more efficient determination of genetic diversity in cattle varieties, a higher number of decamer primers showing a maximum number of polymorphic band or other available marker systems could be utilized. Nevertheless, if the markers developed in the present experimental animals can be linked with quantitative trait loci for economically important traits, they could be used successfully in future breeding and germplasm conservation programs for cattle production systems of Bangladesh.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the short random oligonucleotides of arbitrary sequences can be used to successfully differentiate cattle by variation of RAPD fingerprints in breed-specific DNA pools and subsequently can be used to produce prominent fingerprints in individual animals. The polymorphism of the experimental cattle was 66.67% and suggests that the gene segregation rate has recently increased in these animals. The genetic variation in the experimental cattle populations was high and therefore, there is scope of selective breeding (like ONBS) for future improvement of Red Chittagong, Sahiwal and local cattle. Gradual genetic erosion and extinction is threatening an increasing number of animal species; the major consequence being a loss of global genetic diversity. Sets of genetic markers are required to identify distinct populations so that they can be preserved. The local Bangladeshi Pabna cattle and Red Chittagong cattle are of particular importance because of their favourable meat, milk, leather and draft quality although their productivity is relatively low in general. Like other developing countries, breed substitution and crossbreeding programs with exotic breeds have been practiced indiscriminately in Bangladesh for many years and as a result valuable genetic resources are being lost or diluted. In addition, genetic assessment is also of interest for the design of genetic improvement programs including appropriate choice of breeds for crossbreeding. Thus, it is important to identify molecular characteristics of these breed/populations for undertaking proper breeding programmes and conservation strategy.

References

Bhuiyan AKFH. 1993. Livestock research database for Bangladesh. Funded by USAID Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC). Dhaka, Bangladesh:
Bruford MW, Bradley DG, Luikart G. 2003;DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nat Rev Genet 4(11):900–910.
Buitcamp J, Zischler H, Epplen JT, Geldermann H. 1991;DNA fingerprinting in cattle using oligonucleotide probe. Anim Genet 22:137.
Choy YH, Oh SJ, Kang JO. 2001;Application of RAPD methods in meat for beef breed identification. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 14:1655–1658.
Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Sloignac M. 1999;New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989–2000.
Bo LD, Polli M, Longeri M, Cerotti G, Looft C, Barre-Dirie A, Dolf G, Zanotti M. 2001;Genetic diversity among some cattle breeds in the Alpine area. J Anim Breed Genet 118:317–325.
Garrigan D, Marsh PC, Dowling TE. 2002;Long-term effective population size of three endangered Colorado River fishes. Anim Conserv 5:95–102.
Glowatzki-Mullis C, Gaillard G, Wigger G, Fries R. 1995;Microsatellite based on parentage control in cattle. Anim Genet 26:7–12.
Gwakisa PS, Kemp SJ, Teale AJ. 1994;Characterization of Zebu cattle breeds in Tanzania using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA markers. Anim Genet 25:89–94.
Hassen F, Bekele E, Ayalew W, Dessie T. 2007;Genetic variability of five Indigenous Ethiopian cattle breeds using RAPD markers. Afr J Biotechnol 6:2274–2279.
Kantanen J, Vilkki J, Elo K, Maki-Tanila A. 1995;Random amplified polymorphic DNA in cattle and sheep: application for detecting genetic variation. Anim Genet 26:315–320.
Kemp SJ, Teale AJ. 1994;Characterization of Zebu cattle breeds in Tanzania using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA markers. Anim Genet 25:89–94.
Mannen H, Tsuji S. 1993;DNA fingerprinting for individual identification and parentage test in Japanese Black cattle using five different mini-and one microsatellite probes. J Anim Genet 21:62–68.
Marle-Koster E, Van-Nel LH. 2003;Genetic markers and their application in livestock breeding in South Africa. S Afr J Anim Sci 33:1–10.
Mason IL. 1996. A world dictionary of livestock breeds, types and varieties Fourth Editionth ed. CAB International. p. 273.
Mbulu DN, Hannotte O. 2005. Comparative genetic analysis of molecular diversity of African cattle. The Role of Biotechnology Tulin, Italy:
Mufti MMR, Mostari MP, Deb GK, Nahar K, Huque KS. 2009;Genetic diversity of red Chittagong cattle using Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA markers. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 4:1–5.
Nei M, Li WH. 1979;Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 76:5269–5273.
Roe BA, Crabtree J, Khan A. 1996. DNA isolation and sequencing: Essential techniques series In : Rickwood D, ed. J Wiley and Sons. New York:
Shamsuddin M, Goodger WJ, Hossein MS, Azizunnesa T, Bennett , Nordlund T. 2006;A survey to identify economic opportunities for smallholder dairy farms in Bangladesh. Trop Anim Health Prod 38:131–140.
Sharma M, Singh S, Kushwah A, Sarkhel BC. 2009;Molecular characterization of Malvi and Sahiwal breed of cattle by RAPD-PCR. Indian J Anim Sci 79:44–46.
Simon L, Shyamalamma S, Narayanaswamy P. 2007;Morphological and molecular analysis of Genetic diversity in Jackfruit. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 82:764–768.
Talle SB, Chenyabuga WS, Fimland E, Syrstad O, Meuwissen T, Klungland H. 2005;Use of DNA technologies for the conservation of animal genetic resources. Acta Agric. Scand. Section A-Animal 55:1–8.
Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV. 1990;DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

RAPD profiles using primer OPA-03. The number corresponds to the serial of the genotypes; M is a 100 bp DNA ladder. ‘a’ and ‘b’ bands were monomorphic for all the experimental animals.

Figure 2

RAPD profiles using primer OPA-07. On the gel ‘a’, ‘b’, ‘c’ and ‘d’ bands were monomorphic for all experimental animals.

Figure 3

RAPD profiles using primer OPA-09. ‘a’ is monomorphic for all experimental animals.

Figure 4

The unweighted pair group method of analysis (UPGMA) dendrogram based on summarized data regarding differentiation among experimental cattle.

Table 1

List of primers those showed polymorphism

Primer no. Sequence (5′-3′) (G+C) Contents %
OPA-03 TGCCTCGCACCA 66.7
OPA-07 GGTGACGCAG 70
OPA-09 GTTGCCACCC 70

Table 2

List of primers and their monomorphic and polymorphic bands

Primer code No. of bands No. of monomorphic bands Size of monomorphic bands (bp) No. of polymorphic bands Size of polymorphic bands (bp) Polymorphism (%)
OPA-03 10 2 700-400 8 2,000-900 80
OPA-07 7 4 1,000-700 3 600-400 42.85
OPA-09 4 1 1,600 3 1,200-800 75
Total = 3 21 7 33.33% 14 66.67

Table 3

Estimation of pair wise genetic distance between experimental cattle populations using Nei and Li’s (1979) equation

Tag No. RCC-173 RCC-178 RCC-691 RCC-175 RCC-609 RCC-77 RCC-78 RCC-80 RCC-81 RCC-82 SL-571 SL-614 SL-623 SL-637 SL-638 M-1222 LF-1414 M-1893 M-1980 M-5730
1 ***
2 0.164 ***
3 0.111 0.241 ***
4 0.259 0.172 0.181 ***
5 0.185 0.185 0.393 0.217 ***
6 0.185 0.185 0.304 0.111 0.200 ***
7 0.142 0.142 0.217 0.111 0.133 0.696 ***
8 0.259 0.214 0.304 0.214 0.032 0.125 0.259 ***
9 0.185 0.214 0.533 0.214 0.133 0.307 0.333 0.666 ***
10 0.214 0.142 0.304 0.214 0.161 0.096 0.230 0.161 0.241 ***
11 0.071 0.103 0.333 0.285 0.803 0.096 0.153 0.360 0.172 0.032 ***
12 0.111 0.142 0.185 0.172 0.133 0.033 0.142 0.133 0.066 0.200 0.333 ***
13 0.111 0.142 0.185 0.714 0.133 0.200 0.172 0.133 0.344 0.834 0.230 0.200 ***
14 0.142 0.214 0.142 0.142 0.133 0.602 0.172 0.062 0.133 0.230 0.153 0.307 0.238 ***
15 0.071 0.172 0.143 0.640 0.200 0.230 0.241 0.043 0.333 0.386 0.214 0.346 0.230 0.814 ***
16 0.142 0.103 0.142 0.142 0.096 0.386 0.066 0.142 0.103 0.161 0.172 0.161 0.230 0.083 0.200 ***
17 0.142 0.103 0.142 0.103 0.161 0.384 0.200 0.142 0.103 0.307 0.060 0.307 0.214 0.172 0.200 0.360 ***
18 0.185 0.200 0.172 0.241 0.161 0.307 0.200 0.214 0.096 0.185 0.142 0.259 0.172 0.241 0.032 0.133 0.033 ***
19 0.103 0.572 0.148 0.066 0.217 0.185 0.200 0.103 0.062 0.538 0.111 0.230 0.083 0.066 0.066 0.133 0.142 0.035 ***
20 0.172 0.040 0.103 0.133 0.062 0.153 0.032 0.160 0.111 0.259 0.200 0.259 0.214 0.200 0.161 0.031 0.062 0.142 0.214 ***

1,2,3,4,5…………….correspond to the number of the genotypes.