• Home
  • E-Submission
  • Sitemap
  • Contact Us
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. Search


Go to Top Go to Bottom
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci > Volume 32(8); 2019 > Article
Ayala-Monter, Hernández-Sánchez, González-Muñoz, Pinto-Ruiz, Martínez-Aispuro, Torres-Salado, Herrera-Pérez, and Gloria-Trujillo: Growth performance and health of nursing lambs supplemented with inulin and Lactobacillus casei



This experiment was designed to evaluate the effects of Agave tequilana inulin and Lactobacillus casei (L. casei) on growth performace, hematological variables, serum metabolites, and total coliforms in nursing lambs.


The experimental design was completely randomized; treatments were T1, control (pre-starter concentrate, PC), T2: T1+2% inulin, and T3: T1+2% inulin+L. casei; treatments were compared with Tukey test (p≤0.05); and 45 new born Kathadin×Dorset lambs (4.8±0.8 kg birth weight) were the experimental units (15 per treatment). The variables were daily weight gain (DWG), dry matter intake and diarrheas incidence (%) during 56 d. Twenty-four hours after birth and at the end of the experiment, blood samples were collected to evaluate hematological variables and serum metabolites. Besides, the populations of total coliforms and lactobacilli were estimated in fecal samples.


Addition of agave inulin and L. casei increased (p≤0.05) DWG 356, 384, and 415 g/d, weaning weight 24.92, 26.18, and 28.07 kg, as well as lactobacilli population 5.79, 6.32, and 6.48 Log10 cfu/g, for T1, T2, and T3, respectively. Lambs fed L. casei had decreased (p≤0.05) populations of total coliforms (T1 = 6.18, T2 = 5.77, and T3 = 5.07 Log10 cfu/g), diarrheas incidence (T1 = 11.67%, T2 = 8.33%, and T3 = 5.0%), and serum cholesterol concentration (11% in T2 and 13% in T3, compared to control).


The combination of Agave tequilana inulin and L. casei increases weight gain and improves intestinal health by reducing coliforms and diarrheas incidence in Katahdin× Dorset lambs during the pre-weaning period.


In intensive ovine production systems, the main objective is to obtain high percentages of weaned lambs to achieve larger quantities of meat and replacements. However, average mortality of neonate sheep is 15% [1] caused by inanition, exposure to low temperatures and deficient immunological protection. Regarding this last cause, transmission of antibodies in ruminants is blocked because of the histological nature of the placenta, and lambs are born without immunological protection [2]. Therefore, it is important that they ingest colostrum during the first hours of their lives [3] because later the passage of immunoglobulins through the intestinal villi is reduced and this limits the development of passive immunity [4]. Deficient immunological protection during lactation favors respiratory infections and diarrhea-related digestive infections [5] and lambs fed colostrum without specific antibodies might become sick [2].
Diarrhea in lambs is caused by etiological agents such as bacteria (Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Clostridium spp., Campylobacter spp.), parasites (Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp.) and viruses (of the families Adenoviridae, Coronaviridade, Rotaviriadae). Therefore, diarrhea is a complex, multifactorial syndrome [5], which is economically important in the sheep industry because it causes low growth rates or death of lambs [6].
Prophylactic management of diarrheas is done through application of antimicrobials such as amino glucosides, sulfonamides, macrolides, tetracycline, and quinolones, but their continuous indiscriminate use causes bacteria to become resistant [7]. Probiotics and prebiotics are alternative supplements to antibiotics for controlling diarrheas [8,9].
Prebiotics, such as inulin, stimulate growth of probiotic bacteria [10], which act against pathogens by bacteriocin production and competitive exclusion [11]. This benefits intestinal microflora and lamb growth, while favoring the immune system [9]. In small ruminants, the use of inulin from chicory (Cichorium intybus) [12,13] is documented, but there are few investigations on nursing lambs [14]. In Mexico, inulin is obtained from species of the Agavaceae family [15], but no information was found of inulin used with lambs during nursing. We hypothesized that prebiotics and probiotics can improve lamb health and yield by modifying the microflora in the digestive tube. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of Agave tequilana inulin and Lactobacillus casei (L. casei) on growth performace, hematological variables, serum metabolites and total coliforms in nursing lambs



These study was conducted at the experimental farm of the Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Estado de Mexico (19° 27′ 38″ N, 98° 54′ 11′ W, 2250 masl), from May to August of 2016. The climate is temperate subhumid (Cwb), with summer rains and drought in winter (wo)(w), and moderate humidity (i′) g, with 663.7 mm average annual precipitation, and 15.8°C mean annual temperature. The lambs care and management procedures were conducted according to the guidelines established by the Animal Welfare Committee of the Colegio de Postgraduados.

Animals, management and treatments

Forty-five new-born male Katadin×Dorset lambs (4.8±0.8 kg weight at birth) were used in the experiment. The lambs were obtained from a lot of second-partum ewes. After birth, the lambs were fed colostrum (Table 1). The umbilical cord of each lamb was disinfected (Negasunt, Bayer, Mexico City, Mexico) and lambs were housed with their mothers in individual pens equipped with feeder and waterer. When the ewes were fed, the lambs were kept in the creep feeding in the same pen. The treatments were randomly assigned to one of three treatments (T): T1, control (pre-starter concentrate, PC); T2, T1+2% inulin; and T3, T1+2% inulin+L. casei (n = 15, Table 2). The lambs remained with the ewes until weaning (60±2 d) under the same conditions. During lactation, the lambs were offered, besides nursing, pre-starter feed (Nulamb, Group Nutec, El Marques, Queretaro, Mexico; Table 3) and water, both ad-libitum.
The probiotic and inulin were administered orally with a syringe and oral cannula at 09:00 h during the 56 d (inulin was resuspended in distilled water). The probiotic and probiotic doses were adjusted in each evaluation periods according to the lambs live weight (Table 2). The prebiotic evaluated was Inulin Powder, Bestground (Jalisco, Mexico) and the probiotic was commercial Yakult (Yakult, Ixtapaluca, State of Mexico, Mexico), which contained 108 cfu/mL of L. casei.
The diet provided to each ewe was 800 g/d of commercial concentrate (Ovina Reproductores, Agribrands Purina, Cuautitlan, State of Mexico, Mexico, 14% of crude protein [CP]), 1,200 g/d of oat hay (9.2% of CP), and 800 g/d of alfalfa hay (16.9% of CP, only during the first month of nursing) offered once a day at 08:00 h, and water ad-libitum.

Analysis of colostrum, milk and pre-starter concentrate

Samples of colostrum and milk (50 mL) were collected by manual milking into plastic receptacles 6 h postpartum, on days 5 and 28 of nursing to determine the chemical characteristics (Table 1) with an ultrasonic analyzer (Lactoscan LA, Milkotronic, Nova Zagora, Bulgaria). In the colostrum samples, specific gravity was also measured to estimate the concentration of immunoglobulins [16] with a digital refractometer (Hanna 96801, Eibar, Spain). The chemical composition of the feed (Table 3) was determined according to AOAC methodology [17]: dry matter (DM; method 930.15), CP (method 984.13), ash (method 942.05) and ether extract (method 954.02). Neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber was determined with the analyzer ANKOM (Ankom Technology Corp. A200 Fairport, NY, USA).

Animal performance

Lamb weight was recorded at birth (BW, 6 h after birth). Daily weight gain (DWG, g/d) was estimated by weighing each lamb at birth and every 14 d (08:00 h). Weight at weaning (WW) was obtained on day 60±2. Total weight gain (kg) was calculated as the difference between WW and BW. Feed intake (g/d) was recorded every day, and estimated by group, calculating the difference between offered and rejected feed and dividing by the number of lambs in the group (n = 15).

Hematological variables

Two blood samples, 24 h postpartum and at the end of the experiment (pre-prandial, 08:00 h), were collected (5 mL/lamb) by venopunction of the jugular vein. The first sample was collected in tubes with anticoagulant (BD Vacutainer, Cuautitlan, State of Mexico, Mexico; K2 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) for hematological evaluations, and the second was deposited in tubes without anticoagulant (BD Vacutainer, Mexico; Serum) for separating the serum. Both samples were placed immediately in refrigeration (4°C) until analysis. Determination or erythrocytes, hematocrit, hemoglobin and leucocyte differential was carried out in an automatized hematological analyzer (Sysmex XS-1000i, Kobe, Japan).

Serum metabolites

The blood samples without anticoagulant were centrifuged (Sigma, 2-16KL, Osterode am Harz, Germany) at 3,500×g for 20 min. The obtained serum was conserved in Eppendorf tubes at −20°C until analysis. In each sample the serum concentrations of total cholesterol (TC, oxidase-peroxidase enzyme method), glucose (GLU, enzyme method), total protein (TP, Biuret method), albumin (ALB, Bromo cresol green method) were determined with specific kits acquired from Spinreact (Barcelona, Spain). Readings were done in a visible UV light spectrophotometer (Cary 1-E Varian, Mountain View, CA, USA) at 505, 540, and 630 nm wavelengths for TC and GLU, TP and ALB, respectively. The serum concentration of globulins was estimated by difference between total protein and albumin contents [18].

Total coliforms and lactobacilli in feces (cfu/g)

On the last day of the experiment (09:00 h) fecal samples were collected (10 g/lamb) in sterile collection tubes by rectal stimulation and using latex gloves. The tubes were maintained at 4°C during transport to the laboratory. One gram of each sample was diluted in a Labcon tube with 9 mL peptonized solution (8.5%). It was then homogenized in vortex for serial dilutions of 10−1 to 10−12. Each dilution was seeded in triplicate 100 μL by the striate method in Petri dishes containing selective medium for coliforms (Mac Conkey, Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) or for lactic acid bacteria (de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and incubated 24 and 48 h at 37°C, respectively. After incubation, colony-forming units were counted to estimate the microbial population, and the data were expressed with the base 10 logarithm function (log10). The material and the culture media used in this phase were sterilized 15 min in autoclave (Lab-Med, LMV40, Mexico City, Mexico) at 121°C and 15 psi, and the dilutions and bacterial seeding were performed in a laminar flow hood (Labconco, Logic A2 800, Kansas City, MO, USA).

Diarrhea incidence

Diarrhea incidence was recorded for each lamb during the experiment (08:00 h), based on the presence of stains on the hind legs and accumulation of feces around the perianal area [12]. Lamb health was also monitored.

Statistical analysis

The experimental design was completely randomized with 15 replications per treatment. The results were analyzed with PROC general linear model of SAS [19] and treatments were compared with the Tukey test (p≤0.05). The incidence of diarrheas was analyzed with the X2 test and microorganism count was expressed with the function log10.


Lambs performance

Lambs birth weight was similar (p>0.05) between treatments, and average weight (4.8 kg) at birth (Table 4) was within the optimal range of 3.5 to 5.5 kg [1]. The DWG and weaning weight of lambs that received agave inulin or the combination of inulin with L. casei were 16% higher (p≤0.05) than those of the control group (Table 4). However, weight increase did not change (p>0.05) between lambs supplemented with inulin or with both inulin and L. casei. In addition, dry matter intake (DMI) did not differ (p>0.05) among treatments (Table 4).
Weight gain of lambs at weaning is due in part to nursing and the availability of feed ad-libitum, but the weight gain is related to digestion efficiency which is affected by the presence of prebiotics and probiotics [8]. During nursing, all lambs received colostrum and milk with similar chemical composition (Table 1), since the sheep were kept in analogous conditions of feeding, number and type of birth. The available pre-starter feed covered the nutrient requirements of lambs when the ewes’ milk production diminished. Nevertheless, it is important to underline that natural nursing improves lamb weight gains and immunological variables, as observed in our study [20]. Moreover, the use of lactic acid bacteria during nursing stimulates microbial growth and use of nutrients in the rumen [9]. Thus, the intake of solid diets and physiological development of the rumen is accelerated [21], shortening time to weaning and favoring productive response.
Better daily weight gain was also observed when mixtures of probiotic strains or inulin with Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) were included in the diet of lambs during lactation [14,22], and the positive effects in DWG was also documented with probiotics in diets for growing lambs [2325] or goat kids [26]. However, other studies do not report improved on DWG in lactating lambs [27], goat kids [12], or growing lambs [13] supplemented with probiotics and inulin. An increment in DWG is related to increased DMI [28], but in our study, feed intake did not change (p>0.05; Table 4) because of inulin and L. casei supplementation. Kazemi-Bonchenari et al [13] reported similar results when they fed a mixture of inulin and E. faecium for growing lambs. Moarrab et al [14], however, found that DMI tended to decrease in lambs receiving high doses of prebiotics and probiotics.
The DWG increasing (p≤0.05) without change (p>0.05) in DMI when inulin and L. casei were supplemented together could be related to an improvement in diet digestibility and feed efficiency as reported in other studies [13,14,23]. In addition, it has been shown that a favorable environmental condition for gastrointestinal microbes caused improvement in nutrients digestibility, and probiotic and prebiotic are shown to prepare these conditions in animal [10,11]. Probiotics and prebiotics have the potential to increase short chain fatty acids production and high ruminal levels of these metabolites improve nutrient digestibility due to their effect on bacteria growth and activity [29]. These symbiotic effects of inulin and L. casei also might explain the best DWG being observed when inulin and L. casei were combined in diet, leading to better feed efficiency, therefore DMI did not change between treatments.

Hematological variables

Hematological variables in lambs supplemented with inulin and L. casei were not different (p>0.05) among treatments (Table 5), and the mean values are within the physiological interval reported in the literature for sheep [18]. The hematological variables reported in the literature regarding supplements of inulin and probiotic strains are not conclusive. Thus, no changes were found for growing goat kids [12] and lambs [13], whereas Hossein-Ali et al [24] and Hussein [30] reported increases in hemoglobin, hematocrit and erythrocytes in lambs fed probiotics. Moreover, El-Mehanna et al [25] and Bularon and Plata [26] observed increased leucocyte counts when probiotics were used with lambs and kids during lactation. The hematological variables are affected by age, environmental factors during sample processing, and characteristics and handling of lambs [31], although lamb health was good during our study.

Serum metabolites

Mean values of TC, glucose, total protein, albumin and globulins in lamb serum were not different (p>0.05) among treatments, but at weaning the serum concentration of cholesterol decreased (p≤0.05) 11.6% in lambs that received inulin and 13.3% in lambs fed both inulin and L. casei (Table 6). The values of serum metabolites found in our study are within the normal range described for nursing lambs [18]. The absence of effects on serum concentration of glucose, total protein, albumin and globulins is consistent with reports for nursing lambs [14,25,28] and finishing lambs [13,26] supplemented with prebiotics and probiotics. In contrast, Abdel-Salam et al [23] and Hussein [30] report an increase in concentrations of total protein, albumin and globulins in lambs fed symbiotics and probiotics, respectively. However, according to Hossein-Ali et al [24], there is a decrease in concentrations of these metabolites in lambs fed probiotics. The differences in serum concentrations of the metabolites reported in the literature and those obtained in our study may be due to nutritional factors, type of prebiotic or probiotic (dose, time of administration), and breed, sex, age and state of health of the lambs.
At weaning, the concentration of serum cholesterol decreased (p≤0.05), congruent with Moarrab et al [14] and Saleem et al [27], who included inulin and probiotic strains in lamb diets during weaning. Reduction in the concentration of this metabolite is attributed to the hypocholesterolemic effect of inulin and deconjugation of bile fatty acids due to bile salt hydrolase activity produced by lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Consequently, the fatty acids are less soluble, their absorption in the intestine decreases, and blood concentration is reduced [32]. Because of the histological nature of the placenta in ruminants, lambs are born hypogammaglobulinemic [2,3], and they need to ingest colostrum, 180 to 210 mL/kg liveweight or 10% of their liveweight, for the first 4 h postpartum to receive passive immunity, since absorption decreases as of 6 h postpartum [1,4]. Transfer of passive immunity can be evaluated by measuring the serum concentration of total protein; levels below 5 d/dL are associated with hypogammaglobulinemia [17]. The serum concentration of total protein found in our study (Table 6) indicates that the colostrum ingested by the lambs during the first hours of life gave them passive immunity, as well as contributing growth factors and nutrients such as fats, lactose, vitamins and minerals [3].

Total coliforms and lactobacilli in feces

Addition of inulin and L. casei (T3) decreased (p≤0.05) the population of total coliforms and increased (p≤0.05) that of lactobacilli in lamb feces, relative to the control group (Table 7). Our results are similar to those of Moarrab et al [14], who combined prebiotics and probiotics. Besides, Reddy et al [22] reported a decrease in fecal coliform count in lambs supplemented with probiotic strains of Pediococcus acidiactici and Saccharomyces boulardii during nursing. Before birth, the lamb digestive tube is sterile, after that it is colonized by microorganisms from the birthing channel and the environment. At that moment, establishment of ruminal and intestinal flora begins [21], and the contribution of prebiotics and probiotics is important. The results of our study show that lambs supplemented with inulin and L. casei together had lower total coliform populations, which could be related to the effect of lactic acid bacteria when they produce bacteriocins, hydrogen peroxide and lower pH, causing competitive exclusion of enteropathogens [11]. Prebiotics, such as inulin stimulate growth and activity of lactic acid bacteria, particularly of the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium [10], which have a positive effect on the microflora that maintains the intestinal epithelium healthy and promotes greater availability and absorption of nutrients through intestinal villi [14]. Congruent with this, the combination of inulin and L. casei in our study produced a synergic effect by reducing coliforms population and increasing total lactobacilli.

Diarrhea incidence

In the control group, 11.67% of the lambs had diarrhea, whereas 5.0% of the lambs supplemented with inulin and L. casei had diarrhea during the second and third period of evaluation (Table 8). This is associated with the transition from pre-ruminant to ruminant [21], during which the basic feed of the lambs is their mothers’ milk. However, when ewe milk production diminishes as lactation progresses, the lambs increase intake of solid feed to satisfy their nutritional requirements. This can alter the intestinal flora and lead to mechanical diarrheas. Therefore, it is important that the lambs receive solid feed at an early age so that the ruminal flora can establish and adapt [21,33], whereby decreasing the stress caused by abrupt change in feeding. Otherwise, the glucocorticoid hormones released due to stress will decrease DMI, lambs will have low growth rate [34] and susceptibility to diarrhea-causing pathogens will increase.
The positive response to prebiotics and probiotics could be related to stimulation of the immune system, decrease in stress, and prevention of diarrheas, which optimizes growth of healthy lambs, although the results can vary due to feeding practices, handling, and age at weaning [20,28]. However, the low incidence of diarrhea in our study was due to the combined effect of probiotic and prebiotic, which can produce favorable environmental condition and growth factors for gastrointestinal benefits bacteria [10,11,29] and led to the increase of tottal lactobacilli (Table 7). In this way, L. casei and acido lactic bacteria reduced total coliforms through competitive exclusion. In addition, results can be associated with the prebiotic effect of inulin on caliciform cells that produce mucus, which forms a viscous layer on the intestinal epithelial lining and limits adhesion of enteropathogens. They also modulate the composition of intestinal flora by increasing the population of lactobacilli and stimulate the immune system [9,10], and reduce diarrheas.


Supplementation with the combination of Agave tequilana inulin and L. casei increases weight gain and improves intestinal health by reducing coliforms and diarrheas incidence in Katahdin×Dorset lambs during the pre-weaning period.


The first author thanks the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACyT), for the financial support provided toward his PhD studies.



We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Table 1
Chemical composition of colostrum and milk (average±standard deviation)
Composition (%) Colostrum (6 h) Milk

Early lactation (5 d pospartum) Mid lactation (28 d pospartum)
Fat 8.9±3.3 5.8±2.4 5.2±1.4
Protein 7.5±0.4 4.1±1.4 3.7±0.7
Lactose 3.5±0.3 6.2±2.1 5.5±1.0
Solid not fat 16.0±4.3 11.3±3.9 10.0±1.8
Density 1,056±21.7 1,031±9.7 1,032±2.6
Table 2
Experimental treatments
Periods (d) Control (C)1) C+2% inulin2) g4) C+2% inulin+Lactobacillus casei3) g and mL5)
1–14 - 5 5 and 15
15–28 - 8 8 and 30
19–42 - 12 12 and 45
43–56 - 15 15 and 45

1) Pre-starter concentrate Nulamb (Group Nutec, El Marques, Queretaro, Mexico).

2) Inulin Powder (Bestground, Jalisco, Mexico) contributed 2% based on the consumption of dry matter and was based on the lanbs LW.

3) Yakult (Yakult, Ixtapaluca, State of Mexico, Mexico; 108 cfu/mL).

4) Grams of inulin per lamb per day.

5) Grams of inulin and milliliters of Yakult per lamb per day.

Table 3
Chemical composition of pre-starter concentrate1)
Item Dry matter basis (%)
Dry matter 92.51
Crude protein 18.47
Ether extract 3.50
Ash 6.71
Neutral detergent fiber 24.74
Acid detergent fiber 6.21

1) Pre-starter concentrate Nulamb (Group Nutec, El Marques, Queretaro, Mexico).

Table 4
Growth performance of nursing lambs with an inulin supplement of Agave and Lactobacillus casei
Item Control (C)1) C+2% inulin2) C+2% inulin+L. casei3) SEM p-value
Number of lambs 15 15 15 - -
Birth weight (kg) 4.97 4.65 4.83 0.21 0.58
Weaning weight (kg) 24.92b 26.18ab 28.07a 0.73 0.01
Total weight gain (kg) 19.96b 21.52ab 23.24a 0.61 0.002
Average daily gain (g/d) 356b 384ab 415a 0.01 0.002
Dry matter intake (g/d) 250 252 247 - -

SEM, standar error of the mean.

1) Pre-starter concentrate Nulamb (Group Nutec, El Marques, Queretaro, Mexico).

2) Inulin Powder (Bestground, Jalisco, Mexico).

3) Yakult (Yakult, Ixtapaluca, State of Mexico, Mexico; 108 cfu/mL).

a,b Values with different literal in a row indicate differences (p<0.05).

Table 5
Hematological variables of nursing lambs with an inulin supplement of Agave and Lactobacillus casei
Item Control (C)1) C+2% inulin2) C+2% inulin+L. casei3) SEM p-value
Erythrocytes (106/mL) 5.06 4.91 4.92 0.16 0.76
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.95 11.93 13.64 0.62 0.16
Hematocrit (%) 25.65 24.51 24.53 0.71 0.43
MCV (fL) 50.71 50.00 49.94 0.31 0.17
MCH (pg) 49.93 48.33 50.53 1.83 0.68
MCHC (g/dL) 25.33 26.92 25.23 1.00 0.42
Platelets (mil/μL) 260.33 349.75 285.08 27.14 0.06
Leukocytes (103/mL) 46.39 51.97 51.99 9.63 0.89
Lymphocytes (%) 70.77 71.26 62.01 3.99 0.19
Monocytes (%) 5.30 4.86 3.16 0.74 0.11
Segmented (%) 18.02 14.32 19.83 3.53 0.53
Basophils (%) 1.34 1.40 1.32 0.05 0.53
Eosinophils (%) 0.80 1.13 1.62 0.26 0.10

SEM, standar error of the mean; MCV, medium corpuscular volume; MCH, medium corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, medium corpuscular hemoglobin concentration.

1) Pre-starter concentrate Nulamb (Group Nutec, El Marques, Queretaro, Mexico).

2) Inulin Powder (Bestground, Jalisco, Mexico).

3) Yakult (Yakult, Ixtapaluca, State of Mexico, Mexico; 108 cfu/mL).

Table 6
Blood metabolites of nursing lambs with an inulin supplement of Agave and Lactobacillus casei
Item Control (C)1) C+2% inulin2) C+2% inulin+L. casei3) SEM p-value
Cholesterol (mg/dL)
 Post-birth (24 h) 105.32 98.75 96.58 6.54 0.62
 Weaning (60±2 d) 79.33a 70.07ab 68.76b 2.70 0.01
Glucose (mg/dL)
 Post-birth (24 h) 86.35 83.82 91.80 3.45 0.25
 Weaning (60±2 d) 71.75 73.90 75.26 1.05 0.07
Total protein (g/dL)
 Post-birth (24 h) 6.96 7.10 6.71 0.25 0.54
 Weaning (60±2 d) 6.65 7.06 6.84 0.15 0.19
Albumin (g/dL)
 Post-birth (24 h) 2.53 2.51 2.68 0.91 0.34
 Weaning (60±2 d) 3.24 3.16 3.08 0.06 0.25
Globulin (g/dL)
 Post-birth (24 h) 4.42 4.58 4.02 0.24 0.26
 Weaning (60±2 d) 3.40 3.90 3.75 0.15 0.07

SEM, standar error of the mean.

1) Pre-starter concentrate Nulamb (Group Nutec, El Marques, Queretaro, Mexico).

2) Inulin Powder (Bestground, Jalisco, Mexico).

3) Yakult (Yakult, Ixtapaluca, State of Mexico, Mexico; 108 cfu/mL).

a,b Values with different literal in a row indicate differences (p≤0.05).

Table 7
Total coliforms and lactobacilli in feces (Log10 cfu/g) of nursing lambs with an inulin supplement of Agave and Lactobacillus casei
Item Control (C)1) C+2% inulin2) C+2% inulin+L. casei3) SEM p-value
Total coliforms 6.18a 5.77a 5.07b 0.12 0.0001
Lactic acid bacteria 5.79b 6.32ab 6.48a 0.16 0.02

SEM, standar error of the mean.

1) Pre-starter concentrate Nulamb (Group Nutec, El Marques, Queretaro, Mexico).

2) Inulin Powder (Bestground, Jalisco, Mexico).

3) Yakult (Yakult, Ixtapaluca, State of Mexico, Mexico; 108 cfu/mL).

a,b Values with different literal in a row indicate differences (p≤0.05).

Table 8
Diarrhea incidence (%) of nursing lambs with an inulin supplement of Agave and Lactobacillus casei
Item Control (C)1) C+2% inulin2) C+2% inulin+L. casei3) X2 4) p-value
Normal feces 88.33 91.67 95.00 1.7455 0.4178
Diarrheas 11.67 8.33 5.00

1) Pre-starter concentrate Nulamb (Group Nutec, El Marques, Queretaro, Mexico).

2) Inulin Powder (Bestground, Jalisco, Mexico).

3) Yakult (Yakult, Ixtapaluca, State of Mexico, Mexico; 108 cfu/mL).

4) Value of the Chi square test.


1. Dwyer CM, Conington J, Corbiere F, et al. Invited review: Improving neonatal survival in small ruminants: science into practice. Animal 2016; 10:449–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115001974
crossref pmid
2. Zhang S, Regnault TRH, Barker PL, et al. Placental adaptations in growth restriction. Nutrients 2015; 7:360–89. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7010360
crossref pmid pmc
3. Banchero GE, Milton JTB, Lindsay DR, Martin GB, Quintans G. Colostrum production in ewes: a review of regulation mechanisms and of energy supply. Animal 2015; 9:831–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114003243
crossref pmid
4. Hernández-Castellano LE, Suárez-Trujillo A, Martell-Jaizme D, Cugno G, Argüello A, Castro N. The effect of colostrum period management on BW and immune system in lambs: from birth to weaning. Animal 2015; 9:1672–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111500110X
crossref pmid
5. Martella V, Decaro N, Buonavoglia C. Enteric viral infections in lambs or kids. Vet Microbiol 2015; 181:154–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.08.006
crossref pmid
6. Hassan N, Sheikh GN, Hussian SA, Nazir G. Variation in clinical findings associated with neonatal colibacillosis in lambs before and after treatment. Vet World 2014; 7:262–5.
7. Economou V, Gousia P. Agriculture and food animals as a source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Infect Drug Resist 2015; 8:49–61. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S55778
crossref pmid pmc
8. Angelakis E. Weight gain by gut microbiota manipulation in productive animals. Microb Pathog 2017; 106:162–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2016.11.002
crossref pmid
9. Bahari M. A review on the consumption of probiotics in feeding young ruminants. Appro Poult Dairy Vet Sci 2017; 1:APDV.000508http://dx.doi.org/10.31031/apdv.2017.01.000508
10. Singh AK, Kerketta S, Yogi RK, Kumar A, Ojha L. Prebiotics: the new feed supplement for dairy calf. Int J Livest Res 2017; 7:1–17. https://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170610051314
11. Messaoudi S, Manai M, Kergourlay G, et al. Review Lactobacillus salivarius: bacteriocin and probiotic activity. Food Microbiol 2013; 36:296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.05.010
crossref pmid
12. Kara C, Orman A, Gencoglu H, et al. Effects of inulin supplementation on selected faecal characteristics and health of neonatal Saanen kids sucking milk from their dams. Animal 2012; 6:1947–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112000900
crossref pmid
13. Kazemi-Bonchenari M, Ghasemi1 HA, Khodaei-Motlagh M, Khaltabadi-Farahani AH, Ilani M. Influence of feeding synbiotic containing Enterococcus faecium and inulin on blood metabolites, nutrient digestibility and growth performance in sheep fed alfalfa-based diet. Sci Res Essays 2013; 8:853–7. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE2013.5402

14. Moarrab A, Ghoorchi T, Ramezanpour S, Ganji F, Koochakzadeh AR. Effect of synbiotic on peformance, intestinal morphology, fecal microbial population and blood metabolites of suckling lambs. Iran J Appl Anim Sci 2016; 6:621–8.
15. Carranza OC, Ávila FA, Bustillo AGR, López-Munguía A. Processing of fructans and oligosaccarides from agave plants. Preedy RV, editorProcessing and impact on active components in food. 1st ed.Washington, DC, USA: Academic Press; 2015. p. 121–9.

16. Nagyová V, Tóthová C, Nagy O. The impact of colostrum intake on the serum protein electrophoretic pattern in newborn ruminants. J Appl Anim Res 2017; 45:498–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1218886
17. AOAC. Official methods of analysis Association of Official Analytical Chemist. 18th EdWashington, DC, USA: AOAC International; 2005. p. 70

18. Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML. Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. 6th EdWashington, DC, USA: Academic Press; 2008. p. 273

19. SAS. Institute Inc.. SAS/STAT. Softwere, Ver 9.3. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Inc.; 2012.

20. Hernández-Castellano LE, Moreno-Indias I, Morales-de la Nuez A, et al. The effect of milk source on body weight and immune status of lambs. Livest Sci 2015; 175:70–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.02.011
21. Gupta M, Khan N, Rastogi A, Haq Z, Varun TK. Nutritional drivers of rumen development: a review. Agric Rev 2016; 37:148–53. https://doi.org/10.18805/ar.v37i2.10740
22. Reddy PVM, Reddy KK, Kumar MS, Harikrishna C, Raghunandan T. Effect of feeding Pediococcus acidiactici and Saccharomyces boulardii as probiotics in lambs. Indian J Small Rumin 2011; 17:53–8.
23. Abdel-Salam AM, Zeitoun MM, Abdelsalam MM. Effect of synbiotic supplementation on growth performance, blood metabolites, insulin and testosterone and wool traits of growing lambs. J Biol Sci 2014; 14:292–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2014.292.298
24. Hossein-Ali A, Mashhadi EA, Rezaeian M, Mohtasebi M. Effects of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis-based probiotic on performance, hematological parameters and blood metabolites in lambs. Int J Food Nutr Sci 2014; 3:8–15.

25. El-Mehanna SF, Abdelsalam MM, Hashem NM, El-Azrak KEM, Mansour MM, Zeitoun MM. Relevance of probiotic, prebiotic and symbiotic supplementations on hemato-biochemical parameters, metabolic hormones, biometric measurements and carcass characteristics of sub-tropical Noemi lambs. Int J Adv Res 2017; 1:1–10.
26. Bularon SC, Plata SE. Effect of probiotic supplementation on weight gain, blood biochemical and hematological indices of crossbred dairy goat kids. Glob Adv Res J Agric Sci 2017; 6:128–33.

27. Saleem AM, Zanouny AI, Singer AM. Growth performance, nutrients digestibility, and blood metabolites of lambs fed diets supplemented with probiotics during pre- and post-weaning period. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017; 30:523–30. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0691
crossref pmid
28. De Brito FG, Ponnampalam NE, Hopkins LD. The effect of extensive feeding systems on growth rate, carcass traits, and meat quality of finishing lambs. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2017; 16:23–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12230
29. Yang CMJ. Response of forage fiber degradation by ruminal microorganisms to branched-chain volatile fatty acids, amino acids, and dipeptides. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85:1183–90.
crossref pmid
30. Hussein AF. Effect of biological additives on growth indices and physiological responses of weaned Nadji ram lambs. J Exp Biol Agric Sci 2014; 2:597–607.

31. Ashour G, Ashmawy NA, Dessouki SM, Shihab OH. Blood hematology, metabolites and hormones in newborn sheep and goat from birth to weaning. Int J Adv Res 2015; 3:1377–86.
32. Yoo JY, Kim SS. Probiotics and prebiotics: present status and future perspectives on metabolic disorders. Nutrients 2016; 8:173https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8030173
crossref pmid pmc
33. Liu J, Bian G, Sun D, Zhu W, Mao S. Starter feeding supplementation alters colonic mucosal bacterial communities and modulates mucosal immune homeostasis in newborn lambs. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:429https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00429
crossref pmid pmc
34. Ali MH, Norouzian MA, Khadem AA. Performance and measures of stress in lambs weaned at 45 and 90 days. Iran J Appl Anim Sci 2015; 4:981–5.

Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul
08776, Korea   TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : jongkha@hotmail.com               

Copyright © 2019 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next