Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19:716–723.
AOAC. 1998. Official methods of analysis. 16th Ed4th RevisionAOAC International; Gaithersburg:
Araújo Filho JA, Gadelha JA, Silva NL, Pereira RMA. 1994. Efeito da altura e intervalo de corte na produção de forragem da cunhã (Clitoria ternatea, L.). Pesq Agropec Bras 29:979–982.
Araújo Filho JA, Gadelha JA, Silva NL, Leite ER, Araújo MRA. 1996. Consorciação do capim-elefante (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum.) e da cunhã (Clitoria ternatea, L.) sob quatro intervalos de corte. Past Trop 18:47–50.
Avalos JFV, Cárdenas JAB, Ceja JVR, Guerrero JJB. 2004. Agrotechnics and use of Clitoria ternatea in beef and milk production systems. Téc Pec Méx 42:79–96.
Barro C, Ribeiro A. 1983. The study of Clitoria ternatea L. hay as a forage alternative in tropical countries. Evolution of the chemical composition at four different growth stages. J Sci Food Agric 34:780–782.
Barros NN, Rossetti AG, Carvalho RB. 2004. Feno de cunhã (
Clitoria ternateae L.) para acabamento de cordeiros. Ciênc. Rural 34:499–504.
Barros NN, Freire LCL, Lopes EA, Johnson WL. 1991. Estudo comparativo da digestibilidade de leguminosa forrageira com ovinos e caprinos. 1. Digestibilidade in vivo do feno de cunhã. Pesq Agropec Bras 26:1209–1213.
Beuvink JMW, Spoelstra SF. 1992. Interactions between substrate, fermentation end-products, buffering systems and gas-production upon fermentation of different carbohydrates by mixed rumen microorganisms
in vitro. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 37:505–509.
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2004. Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection. Soc Meth Res 33:261–304.
Cook B, Pengelly B, Brown S, Donnelly J, Eagles D, Franco A, Hanson J, Mullen B, Partridge I, Peters M, Schultze-Kraft R. 2005. Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool. CSIRO, DPI&F; Queensland, CIAT, Cali: 2005. Available at: <
http://www.tropicalforages.info/key/Forages/Media/Html/Clitoria_ternatea.htm>access on: Jan. 20, 2012
Fox DG, Tedeschi LO, Tylutki TP, Russell JB, Van Amburgh ME, Chase LE, Pell AN, Overton TR. 2004. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Anim Feed Sci Technol 112:29–78.
Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. 1970. Agricultural handbook No. 379. Forage fiber analysis. Washington: U.S.D.A; p. 20
Gomez SM, Kalamani A. 2003. Butterfly pea (
Clitoria ternatea): A nutritive multipurpose forage legume for the tropics - an overview. Pak J Nutr 2:374–379.
Gupta GK, Chalal J, Bhatia M. 2010. Clitoria ternatea(L.): Old and new aspects. J Pharm Res 3:2610–2614.
Hall MB, Mertens DR. 2008.
In vitro fermentation vessel type and method alter fiber digestibility estimates. J Dairy Sci 91:301–307.
Hall MB, Pell AN, Chase LE. 1998. Characteristics of neutral detergent-soluble fiber fermentation by mixed ruminal microbes. Anim Feed Sci Technol 70:23–39.
Hall TJ. 1985. Adaptation and agronomy of Clitoria ternatea L. in northern Australia. Trop Grassl 19:156–163.
Huhtanen P, Nousiainen J, Rinne M. 2006. Recent developments in forage evaluation with special reference to practical applications. Agric Food Sci 15:293–323.
Juma HK, Abdulrazak SA, Muing RW, Ambula MK. 2006. Evaluation of Clitoria, Gliricidia and Mucuna as nitrogen supplements to Napier grass basal diet in relation to the performance of lactating Jersey cows. Livest Sci 103:23–29.
Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O. 2006. SAS for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc; Cary, USA:
Longland AC, Theodorou MK, Sanderson R, Lister SJ, Powell CJ, Morris P. 1995. Non-starch polysaccharide composition and
in vitro fermentability of tropical forage legumes varying in phenolic content. Anim Feed Sci Technol 55:161–177.
Lucas HL. 1964. Stochastic elements in biological models; their sources and significances. Stochastic models in medicine and biology. Gurland J, editorUniversity of Wisconsin Press; Madison: p. 355–383.
Malafaia PAM, Filho SCV, Vieira RAM. 1999. Kinetic parameters of ruminal degradation estimated with a non-automated system to measure gas production. Livest Prod Sci 58:65–73.
Mertens DR. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 85:1217–1240.
Mertens DR. 2005. Rate and extent of digestion. Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism. Dijkstra J, Forbes JM, France J, editorsCAB International; Wallingford: p. 13–48.
Neter J, Wasserman W. 1974. Applied linear statistical models. Richard D. Irwin Inc; Homewood:
Pfister JA, Malechek JC. 1986. The voluntary forage intake and nutrition of goats and sheep in the semiarid tropics of northeastern Brazil. J Anim Sci 63:1078–1086.
Russell JB. 2002. Rumen microbiology and its role in ruminant nutrition. James B. Russell; Ithaca: p. 120
Rymer C, Huntington JA, Williams BA, Givens DI. 2005.
In vitro cumulative gas production techniques: History, methodological considerations and challenges. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 123–124:Part 19–30.
Schofield P, Pell AN. 1995. Measurement and kinetic-analysis of the neutral detergent-soluble carbohydrate fraction of legumes and grasses. J Anim Sci 73:3455–3463.
Schofield P, Pitt RE, Pell AN. 1994. Kinetics of fiber digestion from
in vitro gas production. J Anim Sci 72:2980–2991.
Smith LW, Goering HK, Gordon CH. 1972. Relationships of forage compositions with rates of cell wall digestion and indigestibility odf cell walls. J Dairy Sci 55:1140–1147.
Staples IB. 1992.
Clitoria ternatea L. PROSEA (Plant Resources of South-East Asia) Foundation; Mannetje L’t, Jones RM, editorsBogor, Indonesia: 1992. Available at: <
http://www.proseanet.org>Accessed on: Sep. 24, 2012
Tedeschi LO, Cannas A, Fox DG. 2010. A nutrition mathematical model to account for dietary supply and requirements of energy and other nutrients for domesticated small ruminants: The development and evaluation of the Small Ruminant Nutrition System. Small Rumin Res 89:174–184.
Tedeschi LO, Chalupa W, Janczewski E, Fox DG, Sniffen C, Munson R, Kononoff PJ, Boston R. 2008. Evaluation and application of the CPM dairy nutrition model. J Agric Sci 146:171–182.
Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J. 1994. A simple gas-production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 48:185–197.
Thiex NJ, Manson H, Anderson S, Persson JÁ. 2002. Determination of crude protein in animal feed, forage, grain, and oilseeds by using block digestion with a copper catalyst and steam distillation into boric acid: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 85:309–317.
Thiex NJ, Anderson S, Gildemeister B. 2003. Crude fat, hexanes extraction, in feed, cereal grain, and forage (Randall/soxtec/submersion method): collaborative study. J AOAC Int 86:899–908.
Tylutki TP, Fox DG, Durbal VM, Tedeschi LO, Russell JB, Van Amburgh ME, Overton TR, Chase LE, Pell AN. 2008. Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system: A model for precision feeding of dairy cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 143:174–202.
Upadhyaya RS, Pachauri VC. 1983. Nutritive value of Clitoria ternatea L. hay for Barbari goats. Indian J Anim Sci 53:1032–1033.
Van Soest PJ. 1967. Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages. J Anim Sci 26:119–128.
Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press; Ithaca: p. 476
Van Soest PJ. 1996. Allometry and ecology of feeding behavior and digestive capacity in herbivores: a review. Z Biol 15:455–479.
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597.
Vieira RAM, Campos PRSS, Silva JFC, Tedeschi LO, Tamy WP. 2012. Heterogeneity of the digestible insoluble fiber of selected forages
in situ. Anim Feed Sci Technol 171:154–166.
Wilson JR, Mertens DR. 1995. Cell-wall accessibility and cell structure limitations to microbial digestion of forage. Crop Sci 35:251–259.