1. Migliore G, Schifani G, Cembalo L. Opening the black box of food quality in the short supply chain: Effects of conventions of quality on consumer choice. Food Qual Prefer 2015; 39:141–6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.006
4. Thorslunda CAH, Sandøea P, Aaslyng MD, Lassen J. A good taste in the meat, a good taste in the mouth – Animal welfare as an aspect of pork quality in three European countries. Livest Sci 2016; 193:58–65.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.09.007
5. Zamaratskaia G, Lou Y, Peacock J, et al. Effect of polymorphism in the porcine cytochrome b5 (
CYB5A) gene on androstenone and skatole concentrations and sexual development in Swedish pig populations. Animal 2008; 2:190–6.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107001103
6. Moss BW, Hawe SM, Walker N. Sensory thresholds for skatole and indole. Bonneau M, editorMeasurement and prevention of boar taint in entire male pigs. Paris, France: INRA; 1993. p. 63–8.
8. Frieden L, Looft C, Tholen E. Breeding for reduced boar taint. Lohmann Inf 2011; 46:21–7.
11. Prunier A, Brillouët A, Merlot E, Meunier-Salaün MC, Tallet C. Influence of housing and season on pubertal development, boar taint compounds and skin lesions of male pigs. Animal 2013; 7:2035–2043.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001596
13. National Pork Producers Council (NPPC). Berg EP, editorPork composition and quality assessment procedures. Des Moines, IA, USA: 2000.
15. Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, Koohmaraie M. Tenderness classification of beef: II. Design and analysis of a system to measure beef longissimus shear force under commercial processing conditions. J Anim Sci 1999; 77:1474–81.
https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7761474x
20. Merks JWM, Hanenberg EHAT, Bloemhof S, Knol EF. Genetic opportunities for pork production without castration. Anim Welf 2009; 18:539–44.
21. Mancini MA, Menozzi D, Arfini F. Immunocastration: Economic implications for the pork supply chain and consumer perception. An assessment of existing research. Livest Sci 2017; 203:10–20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.06.012
23. Heid A, Hamm U. Consumer attitudes towards alternatives to piglet castration without pain relief in organic farming: qualitative results from Germany. J Agric Environ Ethics 2012; 25:687–706.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9350-2
24. Squires EJ, Schenkel FS. Managing boar taint: focus on genetic markers. In : London Swine Conference 2010; 2010 Mar 31–Apr 1; London, UK.
27. Babol J, Zamaratskaia G, Juneja RK, Lundström K. The effect of age on distribution of skatole and indole levels in entire male pigs in four breeds: Yorkshire, Landrace, Hampshire and Duroc. Meat Sci 2004; 67:351–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.11.008
28. van Wagenberg CPA, Snoek HM, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Vermeer HM, Heres L. Farm and management characteristics associated with boar taint. Animal 2013; 7:1841–8.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001328
29. Giersing M, Lundstrom K, Andersson A. Social effects and boar taint: Significance for production of slaughter boars (
Sus scrofa). J Anim Sci 2000; 78:296–305.
https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.782296x
30. Cornale P, Macchi E, Miretti S. Effects of stocking density and environmental enrichment on behavior and fecal corticosteroid levels of pigs under commercial farm conditions. J Vet Behavior 2015; 10:569–76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2015.05.002