| Home | Subscription | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci > Accepted
doi: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0404    [Accepted]
Effects of different methionine sources on production and reproduction performance, egg quality and serum biochemical indices of broiler breeders
Xue Xiao, Yongxia Wang1, Weilong Liu2, Tingting Ju, Xiuan Zhan*
Feed Science Institute, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
1College of Animal Science and Technology, Zhejiang Agricultural and Forestry University, Hangzhou, China
2Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Bureau,Tongxiang, Zhejiang Province, China., Tongxiang, China
* Corresponding Author: Xiuan Zhan ,Tel: +86-571-88982127, Fax: +86-571-88982650, Email: xazan@zju.edu.cn
Received: May 21, 2016;  Revised: September 2, 2016.  Accepted: December 7, 2016.  Published online December 17, 2016.

The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different methionine (Met) sources on production performance, reproduction performance, egg quality and serum biochemical indices in broiler breeders. After receiving a basal diet (containing 0.25% Met) for a 2-wk pretreatment period, a total of 360 39-wk-old Lingnan yellow broiler breeders were randomly allocated to four treatments with six replicates each (15 birds per replicate). Breeders were fed with basal diets (control) or diets supplemented with DL-methionine (DLM), DL-2-hydroxy-4-methylthio butytric calcium (MHA-Ca) and coated DL-Met (CME) respectively (containing 0.1% Met). The results showed that CME supplementation promoted laying rate and decreased feed-to-egg ration (F/E) (P<0.05), DLM and MHA-Ca supplementation decreased F/E (P<0.05) when compared with control group. The rate of fertility, hatchability and birthrate were higher (P<0.05) in DLM, MHA-Ca and CME groups than control group. Compared with control group, CME increased the eggshell thickness (P<0.05); MHA-Ca improved the eggshell thickness, relative eggshell weight and eggshell strength (P<0.05). Results also showed that CME elevated the concentration of total protein in serum (P<0.05); MHA-Ca improved the concentration of Calcium in serum (P<0.05). The concentration of serum uric acid in DLM, MHA-Ca and CME groups was higher than that in control group (P<0.05). Besides, CME had higher concentrations of serum taurine, cysteine and cystanthionine (P<0.05) while MHA-Ca and DLM promoted the serum taurine concentration (P<0.05) compared with control group. Based on the results, it was concluded that Met supplementation could enhance the production and reproduction performance as well as the antioxidant status and egg quality of broiler breeders. In terms of improving the production performance, reproduction performance and antioxidant performance, CME was superior to DLM and MHA-Ca; but in regard to the enhancement of eggshell quality and serum Ca concentration, MHA-Ca was superior to DLM and CME.
Keywords: Methionine; Broiler breeder; Production performance; Reproduction performance; Egg quality; Serum biochemical indices
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
CrossRef TDM  CrossRef TDM
Effects of alfalfa flavonoids on the production performance, immune system, and ruminal fermentation of dairy cows   ;0(0)
Effects of various weaning times on growth performance, rumen fermentation and microbial population of yellow cattle calves   ;0(0)
Effect of fermented biogas residue on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, and meat quality in pigs   ;0(0)
Effect of dietary protein sources on production performance, egg quality, and plasma parameters of laying hens  2017 March;30(3)
Effects of Dietary Calcium Levels on Productive Performance, Eggshell Quality and Overall Calcium Status in Aged Laying Hens  2016 October;29(10)
Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul
08776, Korea   TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : jongkha@hotmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2014 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. All rights reserved.                 powerd by m2community