Abdelkrim J, Robertson BC, Stanton JAL, Gemmell NJ. 2009. Fast, cost-effective development of species-specific microsatellite markers by genomic sequencing. Biotechniques 46:185–192.
Ahmad A, Zahoor I, Akram M, Babar ME, Basheer A. 2014. Evaluation of genetic diversity within and between the quail breeds in Pakistan. Sci Int 26:1175–1179.
Alkan S, Karslı T, Karabağ K, Galiç A, Balcıoğlu MS. 2013. The effects of thermal manipulation during early and late embryogenesis on hatchability, hatching weight and body weight in Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Arc Tierz 56:789–796.
Amirinia C, Emrani H, Arbabe MAR, Torshizi RV, Javaremi AN. 2007. Evaluation of eight microsatellite loci polymorphism in four Japanese quail (
Coturnix japonica) strain in Iran. Pak J Biol Sci 10:1195–1199.
Babar ME, Nadeem A, Hussain T, Wajid A, Shah SA, Iqbal A, Sarfraz Z, Akram M. 2012. Microsatellite marker based genetic diversity among four varieties of Pakistan Aseel chicken. Pak Vet J 32:237–241.
Bai YJ, Pang YZ, Wu SJ, Yu MQ, Zhang XH, Zhao SJ, Xu HW. 2013. Polymorphism Analysis of Chinese yellow quail using microsatellite markers. J Anim Plant Sci 23:1072–1076.
Botstein D, White RL, Skolnik M, Davis RW. 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331.
Chang GB, Chang H, Liu XP, Zhao WM, Ji DJ, Mao YJ, Song GH, Shi XK. 2007. Genetic diversity of wild quail in China ascertained with microsatellite DNA markers. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 20:1783–1790.
Charati H, Koshkoiyeh AE, Ori RJ, Moradian H, Menrgardi AA. 2014. Detection of quantitative trait loci affecting carcass traits and internal organs on chromosome 3 in an F2 intercross of Japanese quail. Anim Sci Pap Rep 32:369–383.
Chen GH, Wu XS, Wang DQ, Qin J, Wu SL, Zhou QL, Xie F, Cheng R, Xu Q, Liu B, Zhang XY, Olowofeso O. 2004. Cluster analysis of 12 Chinese native chicken populations using microsatellite markers. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 17:1047–1052.
Davila SG, Gil MG, Resino-Talavan P, Campo JL. 2009. Evaluation of diversity between different Spanish chicken breeds, a tester line and a White Leghorn population based on microsatellite markers. Poult Sci 88:2518–2525.
Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361.
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of cluster of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620.
Farrag SA, Tanatarov AB, Soltan ME, Ismail M, Zayed OM. 2011. Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in three populations of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) from Kazakhstan. J Anim Vet Adv 10:2376–2383.
Gomes ML, Haranaka T, deCampos WN, Wasko AP. 2013. Assessing paternity in Japanese quails (
Coturnix Japonica) using microsatellite markers - inferences for its mating system and reproductive success. Rev Bras Cienc Avic 15:329–338.
Gruszczynska J, Michalska E. 2013. Application of chicken microsatellite markers to molecular monitoring of the experimental population of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Anim Sci Pap Rep 31:73–84.
Hartl DL, Clark AG. 1997. Principles of Population Genetics. 3rd ednSinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers; Sunderland, MA, USA:
Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. 2007. Revising how to computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106.
Kim SH, Cheng KMT, Ritland C, Ritland K, Silversides FG. 2007. Inbreeding in Japanese quail estimated by pedigree and microsatellite analyses. J Hered 98:378–381.
Nei M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics: Columbia University Press; NY, USA:
Rosenberg NA. 2004. Distruct: A program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4:137–138.
Tadano R, Nunome M, Mizutani M, Kawahara-Miki R, Fujiwara A, Takahashi S, Kawashima T, Nirasawa K, Ono T, Kono TY, Matsuda Y. 2014. Cost-effective development of highly polymorphic microsatellite in Japanese quail facilitated by next-generation sequencing. Anim Genet 45:881–884.